排序方式： 共有14条查询结果，搜索用时 15 毫秒
1.
Abe K Akagi T Anthony PL Antonov R Arnold RG Averett T Band HR Bauer JM Borel H Bosted PE Breton V Button-Shafer J Chen JP Chupp TE Clendenin J Comptour C Coulter KP Court G Crabb D Daoudi M Day D Dietrich FS Dunne J Dutz H Erbacher R Fellbaum J Feltham A Fonvieille H Frlez E Garvey D Gearhart R Gomez J Grenier P Griffioen KA Hoibraten S Hughes EW Hyde-Wright C Johnson JR Kawall D Klein A Kuhn SE Kuriki M Lindgren R Liu TJ Lombard-Nelsen RM Marroncle J Maruyama T Maruyama XK McCarthy J Meyer W 《Physical review letters》1995,74(3):346-350
2.
Lung A Stuart LM Bosted PE Andivahis L Alster J Arnold RG Chang CC Dietrich FS Dodge WR Gearhart R Gomez J Griffioen KA Hicks RS Hyde-Wright CE Keppel C Kuhn SE Lichtenstadt J Miskimen RA Peterson GA Petratos GG Rock SE Rokni SH Sakumoto WK Spengos M Swartz K Szalata Z Tao LH 《Physical review letters》1993,70(6):718-721
3.
4.
Bosted PE Andivahis L Lung A Stuart LM Alster J Arnold RG Chang CC Dietrich FS Dodge W Gearhart R Gomez J Griffioen KA Hicks RS Hyde-Wright CE Keppel C Kuhn SE Lichtenstadt J Miskimen RA Peterson GA Petratos GG Rock SE Rokni S Sakumoto WK Spengos M Swartz K Szalata Z Tao LH 《Physical review letters》1992,68(26):3841-3844
5.
Weinstein LB Baghaei H Bertozzi W Finn JM Glickman J Hyde-Wright CE Kalantar-Nayestanaki N Lourie RW Nelson JA Sapp WW Sargent CP Ulmer PE Cottman BH Ghedira L Winhold EJ Calarco JR Wise J Boberg P Chang CC Zhang D Aniol K Epstein MB Margaziotis DJ Perdrisat C Punjabi V 《Physical review letters》1990,64(14):1646-1649
6.
7.
Andivahis L Bosted PE Lung A Stuart LM Alster J Arnold RG Chang CC Dietrich FS Dodge W Gearhart R Gomez J Griffioen KA Hicks RS Hyde-Wright CE Keppel C Kuhn SE Lichtenstadt J Miskimen RA Peterson GA Petratos GG Rock SE Rokni S Sakumoto WK Spengos M Swartz K Szalata Z Tao LH 《Physical review D: Particles and fields》1994,50(9):5491-5517
8.
Abe K Akagi T Anthony PL Antonov R Arnold RG Averett T Band HR Bauer JM Borel H Bosted PE Breton V Button-Shafer J Chen JP Chupp TE Clendenin J Comptour C Coulter KP Court G Crabb D Daoudi M Day D Dietrich FS Dunne J Dutz H Erbacher R Fellbaum J Feltham A Fonvieille H Frlez E Garvey D Gearhart R Gomez J Grenier P Griffioen KA Hoibraten S Hughes EW Hyde-Wright C Johnson JR Kawall D Klein A Kuhn SE Kuriki M Lindgren R Liu TJ Lombard-Nelsen RM Marroncle J Maruyama T Maruyama XK McCarthy J Meyer W 《Physical review letters》1996,76(4):587-591
9.
Roche J Friedrich JM Lhuillier D Bartsch P Baumann D Berthot J Bertin PY Breton V Boeglin WU Bohm R D'Hose N Derber S Degrande N Ding M Distler MO Ducret JE Ewald I Fonvieille H Friedrich J Guichon PA Holvoet H Hyde-Wright CE Jennewein P Kahrau M Kerhoas S Krygier KW 《Physical review letters》2000,85(4):708-711
Absolute differential cross sections for the reaction ep-->epgamma have been measured at a four-momentum transfer with virtuality Q2 = 0.33 GeV2 and polarization epsilon = 0.62 in the range 33.6 to 111.5 MeV/c for the momentum of the outgoing photon in the photon-proton center of mass frame. The experiment has been performed with the high-resolution spectrometers at the Mainz Microtron MAMI. From the photon angular distributions, two structure functions which are a linear combination of the generalized polarizabilities have been determined for the first time. 相似文献
10.
Malace SP Paolone M Strauch S Albayrak I Arrington J Berman BL Brash EJ Briscoe B Camsonne A Chen JP Christy ME Chudakov E Cisbani E Craver B Cusanno F Ent R Garibaldi F Gilman R Glamazdin O Glister J Higinbotham DW Hyde-Wright CE Ilieva Y de Jager CW Jiang X Jones MK Keppel CE Khrosinkova E Kuchina E Kumbartzki G Lee B Lindgren R Margaziotis DJ Meekins D Michaels R Park K Pentchev L Perdrisat CF Piasetzky E Punjabi VA Puckett AJ Qian X Qiang Y Ransome RD Saha A Sarty AJ Schulte E Solvignon P 《Physical review letters》2011,106(5):052501
We measured with unprecedented precision the induced polarization P(y) in (4)He(e,e'p)(3)H at Q(2)=0.8 and 1.3 (GeV/c)(2). The induced polarization is indicative of reaction-mechanism effects beyond the impulse approximation. Our results are in agreement with a relativistic distorted-wave impulse approximation calculation but are overestimated by a calculation with strong charge-exchange effects. Our data are used to constrain the strength of the spin-independent charge-exchange term in the latter calculation. 相似文献