排序方式: 共有9条查询结果,搜索用时 31 毫秒
1
1.
Abe K Akagi T Anthony PL Antonov R Arnold RG Averett T Band HR Bauer JM Borel H Bosted PE Breton V Button-Shafer J Chen JP Chupp TE Clendenin J Comptour C Coulter KP Court G Crabb D Daoudi M Day D Dietrich FS Dunne J Dutz H Erbacher R Fellbaum J Feltham A Fonvieille H Frlez E Garvey D Gearhart R Gomez J Grenier P Griffioen KA Hoibraten S Hughes EW Hyde-Wright C Johnson JR Kawall D Klein A Kuhn SE Kuriki M Lindgren R Liu TJ Lombard-Nelsen RM Marroncle J Maruyama T Maruyama XK McCarthy J Meyer W 《Physical review letters》1995,74(3):346-350
2.
Meziane M Brash EJ Gilman R Jones MK Luo W Pentchev L Perdrisat CF Puckett AJ Punjabi V Wesselmann FR Ahmidouch A Albayrak I Aniol KA Arrington J Asaturyan A Ates O Baghdasaryan H Benmokhtar F Bertozzi W Bimbot L Bosted P Boeglin W Butuceanu C Carter P Chernenko S Christy E Commisso M Cornejo JC Covrig S Danagoulian S Daniel A Davidenko A Day D Dhamija S Dutta D Ent R Frullani S Fenker H Frlez E Garibaldi F Gaskell D Gilad S Goncharenko Y Hafidi K Hamilton D Higinbotham DW Hinton W Horn T Hu B 《Physical review letters》2011,106(13):132501
Intensive theoretical and experimental efforts over the past decade have aimed at explaining the discrepancy between data for the proton electric to magnetic form factor ratio, G(E)/G(M), obtained separately from cross section and polarization transfer measurements. One possible explanation for this difference is a two-photon-exchange contribution. In an effort to search for effects beyond the one-photon-exchange or Born approximation, we report measurements of polarization transfer observables in the elastic H(e[over →],e(')p[over →]) reaction for three different beam energies at a Q(2)=2.5 GeV(2), spanning a wide range of the kinematic parameter ε. The ratio R, which equals μ(p)G(E)/G(M) in the Born approximation, is found to be independent of ε at the 1.5% level. The ε dependence of the longitudinal polarization transfer component P(?) shows an enhancement of (2.3±0.6)% relative to the Born approximation at large ε. 相似文献
3.
4.
Abe K Akagi T Anthony PL Antonov R Arnold RG Averett T Band HR Bauer JM Borel H Bosted PE Breton V Button-Shafer J Chen JP Chupp TE Clendenin J Comptour C Coulter KP Court G Crabb D Daoudi M Day D Dietrich FS Dunne J Dutz H Erbacher R Fellbaum J Feltham A Fonvieille H Frlez E Garvey D Gearhart R Gomez J Grenier P Griffioen KA Hoibraten S Hughes EW Hyde-Wright C Johnson JR Kawall D Klein A Kuhn SE Kuriki M Lindgren R Liu TJ Lombard-Nelsen RM Marroncle J Maruyama T Maruyama XK McCarthy J Meyer W 《Physical review letters》1996,76(4):587-591
5.
Pocanić D Frlez E Baranov VA Bertl W Brönnimann Ch Bychkov M Crawford JF Daum M Khomutov NV Korenchenko AS Korenchenko SM Kozlowski T Kravchuk NP Kuchinsky NA Li W Minehart RC Mzhavia D Ritchie BG Ritt S Rozhdestvensky AM Sidorkin VV Smith LC Supek I Tsamalaidze Z VanDevender BA Wang Y Wirtz HP Ziock KO 《Physical review letters》2004,93(18):181803
Using a large acceptance calorimeter and a stopped pion beam we have made a precise measurement of the rare pi(+)-->pi(0)e(+)nu (pi(beta)) decay branching ratio. We have evaluated the branching ratio by normalizing the number of observed pi(beta) decays to the number of observed pi(+)-->e(+)nu (pi(e2)) decays. We find the value of Gamma(pi(+)-->pi(0)e(+)nu)/Gamma(total)=[1.036+/-0.004(stat)+/-0.004(syst)+/-0.003(pi(e2))]x10(-8), where the first uncertainty is statistical, the second systematic, and the third is the pi(e2) branching ratio uncertainty. Our result agrees well with the standard model prediction. 相似文献
6.
Wesselmann FR Slifer K Tajima S Aghalaryan A Ahmidouch A Asaturyan R Bloch F Boeglin W Bosted P Carasco C Carlini R Cha J Chen JP Christy ME Cole L Coman L Crabb D Danagoulian S Day D Dunne J Elaasar M Ent R Fenker H Frlez E Gan L Gaskell D Gomez J Hu B Jones MK Jourdan J Keith C Keppel CE Khandaker M Klein A Kramer L Liang Y Lichtenstadt J Lindgren R Mack D McKee P McNulty D Meekins D Mkrtchyan H Nasseripour R Niculescu I Normand K Norum B Pocanic D Prok Y Raue B Reinhold J Roche J Rohe D 《Physical review letters》2007,98(13):132003
We have examined the spin structure of the proton in the region of the nucleon resonances (1.085 GeV相似文献
7.
8.
Abe K Akagi T Anthony PL Antonov R Arnold RG Averett T Band HR Bauer JM Borel H Bosted PE Breton V Button-Shafer J Chen JP Chupp TE Clendenin J Comptour C Coulter KP Court G Crabb D Daoudi M Day D Dietrich FS Dunne J Dutz H Erbacher R Fellbaum J Feltham A Fonvieille H Frlez E Garvey D Gearhart R Gomez J Grenier P Griffioen KA Hoibraten S Hughes EW Hyde-Wright C Johnson JR Kawall D Klein A Kuhn SE Kuriki M Lindgren R Liu T Lombard-Nelsen RM Marroncle J Maruyama T Maruyama XK McCarthy J Meyer W 《Physical review letters》1995,75(1):25-28
9.
Frlez E Pocanić D Baranov VA Bertl W Bychkov M Khomutov NV Korenchenko AS Korenchenko SM Kozlowski T Kravchuk NP Kuchinsky NA Li W Minehart RC Mzhavia D Ritchie BG Ritt S Rozhdestvensky AM Sidorkin VV Smith LC Supek I Tsamalaidze Z VanDevender BA Velicheva EP Wang Y Wirtz HP Ziock KO 《Physical review letters》2004,93(18):181804
We have studied radiative pion decays pi(+)-->e(+)nugamma in three broad kinematic regions using the PIBETA detector and a stopped pion beam. Based on Dalitz distributions of 41 601 events we have evaluated absolute pi-->enugamma branching ratios in the three regions. Minimum chi(2) fits to the integral and differential (E(e(+)),E(gamma)) distributions result in the axial-to-vector weak form factor ratio of gamma identical with F(A)/F(V)=0.443(15), or F(A)=0.0115(4) with F(V)=0.0259. However, deviations from standard model predictions in the high-E(gamma)-low-E(e(+)) kinematic region indicate the need for further theoretical and experimental work. 相似文献
1