Principal component analysis of polymer–solvent and filler–solvent interactions by inverse gas chromatography

Polymers (polyethylene, polyurethane), silica and modified silicas (modified with: N-2-aminoethyl-3-aminopropyltrimethoxysilane, 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane, 3-merkaptopropyltrimethoxysilane, triethoxyoctylsilane) were examined by inverse gas chromatography at four different temperatures: 363, 383, 393 and 403 K. The modifiers of silica were applied at five different concentrations. Small amounts of the following test solutes were injected to achieve the infinite dilution conditions: pentane, hexane, heptane, octane, nonane, dichloromethane, chloroform, carbon tetrachloride, and 1,2-dichloroethane.

The retention times for these test solutes were determined and Flory–Huggins parameters were calculated. Values of these physico-chemical parameters characterizing the examined materials were arranged in a matrix form: in the rows the supports and modifiers were enumerated at different temperatures whereas the columns contained the test solutes. The input matrix was subject to principal component analysis after standardization. Three principal components explain more than 93% of the total variance in the data. Four test solutes (hexane, heptane, chloroform and carbon tetrachloride) carry very similar information. Therefore, it is justified to eliminate any three of them from the series of test solutes. Modifiers, supports and various temperatures were classified and different groups were observed according to the dominant interactions. Type of modifier, its content, and temperature can change and shift the properties from the dominant clusters to the neighboring clusters. Unambiguous separation was observed in cases of silica modified with 5 and 10 parts of triethoxyoctylsilane at all examined temperatures.     

Inverse gas chromatography as a source of physiochemical data

Inverse gas chromatography (IGC) is presented as a useful method for the examination of physicochemical properties of various materials. The advantages of IGC are presented. However, the uncertainties and sources of possible errors are also indicated and discussed.     

Characterization of the interactions in polymer-filler systems by inverse gas chromatography

Chromium is a primary drinking water contaminant in the USA with hexavalent chromium, Cr(VI), being the most toxic form of the metal. As a required step in developing a revised state drinking water standard for chromium, the California Department of Health Services recently issued a new Public Health Goal (PHG) of 2.5 microg/l for total chromium and 0.2 microg/l for Cr(VI). Hexavalent chromium can be determined (as chromate) by ion chromatography, as described in US Evironmental Protection Agency Method 218.6; however, the method as originally published does not allow sufficient sensitivity for analysis at the California PHG level of 0.2 microg/l. Modification of the conditions described in Method 218.6, including the use of a lower eluent flow-rate, larger reaction coil, and larger injection volume, significantly increases the method sensitivity. The modified method, which uses IonPac NG1 and AS7 guard and analytical columns, an eluent of 250 mM ammonium sulfate-100 mM ammonium hydroxide operated at 1.0 ml/min, a 1000 microl injection volume, and postcolumn reaction with 2 mM diphenylcarbazide-10% methanol-0.5 M sulfuric acid (using a 750 microl reaction coil) followed by UV-Vis detection at 530 nm, permits a method detection limit for chromate of 0.02 microg/l. This results in a quantitation limit of 0.06 microg/l, which is more than sufficient for analysis at the California PHG level. Calibration is linear over the range of 0.1-10 microg/l and quantitative recoveries (>80%) are obtained for chromate spiked at 0.2 microg/l in drinking water. The modified method provides acceptable performance, in terms of chromate peak shape and recovery, in the presence of up to 1000 mg/l chloride or 2000 mg/l sulfate.     

Characterization of the interactions in polymer/silica systems by inverse gas chromatography

Authors propose to express the magnitude of modified filler/polymer interactions by Flory ‐ Huggins χ₂₃ parameter. We investigated polyether‐urethane/modified silica systems containing different amounts of filler (5, 10,20%wt). Moreover, information on the physicochemical properties of oligomer and modified silicas were presented with the use of the following parameters: • solubility parameter δ₂, describing properties of the polymer layer; • Flory‐Huggins parameter χ₁₂^∞ which describes polymer‐solute or mixture polymer/silica‐solute interactions. These parameters δ₂ and χ₁₂^∞ are obtained from Inverse Gas Chromatography experiments. The influence of the IGC experiment temperature, the content of modified silica, the nature of test solute on the evaluated parameters are presented and discussed.     

Principal component analysis of polarity and interaction parameters in inverse gas chromatography

Inverse gas chromatography is used in the characterization of aliphatic-aromatic and aromatic ketones, their oximes, and ketone-oxime or oxime-oxime mixtures. All these organic materials are used as liquid stationary phases in gas chromatographic columns. A series of polarity and Flory-Huggins interaction parameters are determined and used to describe the physicochemical properties of examined materials, metal extractants, and products of their degradation. Principal component analysis (PCA) is performed on a data matrix consisting of polarity and interaction parameters for ketones, their oximes, and mixtures. The calculations are carried out on the correlation matrix. It is found that seven principal components account for more than 95% of the total variance in the data, indicating that the polarity (interaction) parameters are not correlating well. Physical meanings are attributed to the principal components, the most influential ones being that the first and the second principal components account for several Flory-Huggins interaction parameters, whereas the fifth is correlated with criterion "A". The plots of component loadings show characteristic groupings of polarity indicators, whereas that of component scores show several groupings of stationary phases. Cluster analysis provides mainly the same groupings. PCA allows for the grouping of polarity and solubility parameters based on the information carried within those parameters. There is no need to use more than one parameter from each cluster. McReynolds polarity and the partial molar excess Gibbs free energy of solution per methylene group carry the same information. The groups of ketones, oximes, and their mixtures can be distinguished with the use of PCA on the basis of the measured polarity, solubility parameters, or both.     

The use of Flory–Huggins parameters as a measure of interactions in polymer‐filler systems

Any quantitative information on the strength of interactions between inorganic filler and polymer is substantial for the future application of the composite. The magnitude of adhesion of two phases may be deduced from results collected by various experimental techniques. Polyether‐urethane/modified carbonate‐silicate fillers systems containing different amount of filler (5, 10, and 20 wt %) were the materials investigated. We propose to express the magnitude of modified filler/polymer interactions by Flory–Huggins χ parameter. It may be deduced from the results collected by inverse gas chromatographic (IGC) experiment. We have also tried to explain the influence of the solvent on values of the evaluated parameters and to check the usefulness of some of presented methods to minimize Δχ effect. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 44: 1853–1862, 2006