Determination of micelle structure and charge by neutron small-angle scattering

We present a general method of determining the structure and charge of globular ionic micelles, using neutron small-angle scattering. The micellar solutions may have any concentration within the micellar phase. The method is based in part on an analytic calculation of the interparticle correlations between monodisperse spherical micelles, and we discuss the theory in some detail to justify its application to polydisperse globular particles. Experimental results are presented for several cationic and anionic micellar systems.     

Polyelectrolyte modified solid surfaces: the consequences for ionic and mixed ionic/nonionic surfactant adsorption

This paper describes how the cationic polyelectrolyte, polyDMDAAC (poly(dimethyl diallylammonium chloride)), is used to manipulate the adsorption of the anionic surfactant SDS and the mixed ionic/nonionic surfactant mixture of SDS (sodium dodecyl sulfate)/C(12)E(6) (monododecyl hexaethylene glycol) onto the surface of hydrophilic silica. The deposition of a thin robust polymer layer from a dilute polymer/surfactant solution promotes SDS adsorption and substantially modifies the adsorption of SDS/C(12)E(6) mixtures in favor of a surface relatively rich in SDS compared to the solution composition. Different deposition conditions for the polyDMDAAC layer are discussed. In particular, at higher solution polymer concentrations and in the presence of 1 M NaCl, a thicker polymer layer is deposited and the reversibility of the surfactant adsorption is significantly altered.     

Adsorption of polyelectrolyte/surfactant mixtures at the air-solution interface: poly(ethyleneimine)/sodium dodecyl sulfate

Neutron reflectivity and surface tension have been used to characterize the adsorption of the polyelectrolyte/ionic surfactant mixture of poly(ethyleneimine) (PEI) and sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) at the air-water interface. The surface tension behavior and adsorption patterns show a strong dependence upon the solution pH. However, the SDS adsorption at the interface is unexpectedly most pronounced when the pH is high (when the polymer is essentially a neutral polymer) and when the polymer architecture is branched rather than linear. For both the branched and the linear PEI polymer/surfactant complex formation results in a significant enhancement of the amount of SDS at the interface, down to surfactant concentrations approximately 10(-6) M. For the branched PEI a transition from a monolayer to a multilayer adsorption is observed, which depends on surfactant concentration and pH. In contrast, for the linear polymer, only monolayer adsorption is observed. This substantial increase in the surface activity of SDS by complexation with PEI results in spontaneous emulsification of hexadecane in water and the efficient wetting of hydrophobic substrates such as Teflon. In regions close to charge neutralization the multilayer adsorption is accentuated, and more extensively ordered structures, giving rise to Bragg peaks in the reflectivity data, are evident.     

Binding of sodium dodecyl sulfate and hexaethylene glycol mono-n-dodecyl ether to the block copolymer L64: electromotive force, microcalorimetry, surface tension, and small angle neutron scattering investigations of mixed micelles and polymer/micellar surfactant complexes

The interactions of sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) with the triblock copolymer L64 (EO13-PO30-EO13) and hexaethylene glycol mono-n-dodecyl ether (C12EO6) were studied using electromotive force, isothermal titration microcalorimetry, differential scanning microcalorimetry, and surface tension measurements. In certain regions of binding, mixed micelles are formed, and here we could evaluate an interaction parameter using regular solution theory. The mixed micelles of L64 with both SDS and C12EO6 exhibit synergy. When L64 is present in its nonassociated state, it forms polymer/micellar SDS complexes at SDS concentrations above the critical aggregation concentration (cac). The cac is well below the critical micellar concentration (cmc) of pure SDS, and a model suggesting how bound micelles are formed at the cac in the presence of a polymer is described. The interaction of nonassociated L64 with C12EO6 is a very rare example of strong binding between a nonionic surfactant and a nonionic polymer, and C12EO6/L64 mixed micelles are formed. We also carried out small angle neutron scattering measurement to determine the structure of the monomeric polymer/micellar SDS complex, as well as the mixed L64/C12EO6 aggregates. In these experiments, contrast matching was achieved by using the h and d forms of SDS, as well as C12EO6. During the early stages of the formation of polymer-bound SDS micelles, SDS aggregates with aggregation numbers of approximately 20 were found and such complexes contain 4-6 bound L64 monomers. The L64/C12EO6 data confirmed the existence of mixed micelles, and structural information involving the composition of the mixed micelle and the aggregation numbers were evaluated.     

Mapping of the Photoinduced Electron Traps in TiO2 by Picosecond X‐ray Absorption Spectroscopy

Titanium dioxide (TiO₂) is the most popular material for applications in solar‐energy conversion and photocatalysis, both of which rely on the creation, transport, and trapping of charges (holes and electrons). The nature and lifetime of electron traps at room temperature have so far not been elucidated. Herein, we use picosecond X‐ray absorption spectroscopy at the Ti K‐edge and the Ru L₃‐edge to address this issue for photoexcited bare and N719‐dye‐sensitized anatase and amorphous TiO₂ nanoparticles. Our results show that 100 ps after photoexcitation, the electrons are trapped deep in the defect‐rich surface shell in the case of anatase TiO₂, whereas they are inside the bulk in the case of amorphous TiO₂. In the case of dye‐sensitized anatase or amorphous TiO₂, the electrons are trapped at the outer surface. Only two traps were identified in all cases, with lifetimes in the range of nanoseconds to tens of nanoseconds.     

Solution self-assembly and adsorption at the air-water interface of the monorhamnose and dirhamnose rhamnolipids and their mixtures

The self-assembly in solution and adsorption at the air-water interface, measured by small-angle neutron scattering, SANS, and neutron reflectivity, NR, of the monorhamnose and dirhamnose rhamnolipids (R1, R2) and their mixtures, are discussed. The production of the deuterium-labeled rhamnolipids (required for the NR studies) from a Pseudomonas aeruginosa culture and their separation into the pure R1 and R2 components is described. At the air-water interface, R1 and R2 exhibit Langmuir-like adsorption isotherms, with saturated area/molecule values of about 60 and 75 ?(2), respectively. In R1/R2 mixtures, there is a strong partitioning of R1 to the surface and R2 competes less favorably because of the steric or packing constraints of the larger R2 dirhamnose headgroup. In dilute solution (<20 mM), R1 and R2 form small globular micelles, L(1), with aggregation numbers of about 50 and 30, respectively. At higher solution concentrations, R1 has a predominantly planar structure, L(α) (unilamellar, ULV, or bilamellar, BLV, vesicles) whereas R2 remains globular, with an aggregation number that increases with increasing surfactant concentration. For R1/R2 mixtures, solutions rich in R2 are predominantly micellar whereas solutions rich in R1 have a more planar structure. At an intermediate composition (60 to 80 mol % R1), there are mixed L(α)/L(1) and L(1)/L(α) regions. However, the higher preferred curvature associated with R2 tends to dominate the mixed R1/R2 microstructure and its associated phase behavior.     

Identification of archaeal proteins that affect the exosome function in vitro

Background  

The archaeal exosome is formed by a hexameric RNase PH ring and three RNA binding subunits and has been shown to bind and degrade RNA in vitro. Despite extensive studies on the eukaryotic exosome and on the proteins interacting with this complex, little information is yet available on the identification and function of archaeal exosome regulatory factors.