Upper bounds for the first dirichlet eigenvalue of a tube around an algebraic complex curve of ℂ<Emphasis Type="Italic">P</Emphasis><Superscript><Emphasis Type="Italic">n</Emphasis></Superscript>(<Emphasis Type="Italic">λ</Emphasis>)

We give an upper bound for the first Dirichlet eigenvalue of a tube around a complex curve P of ℂP ⁿ (λ) which depends only on the radius of the tube and the degrees of the polynomials defining P. The bound is sharp on a totally geodesic ℂP ¹(λ) and gives a gap between the eigenvalue of a tube around ℂP ¹(λ) and around other complex curves.     

Pappus type theorems for hypersurfaces in a space form

In order to get further insight on the Weyl’s formula for the volume of a tubular hypersurface, we consider the following situation. Letc(t) be a curve in a space formM _λ ⁿ of sectional curvature λ. LetP ₀ be a totally geodesic hypersurface ofM _λ ⁿ throughc(0) and orthogonal toc(t). LetC ₀ be a hypersurface ofP ₀. LetC be the hypersurface ofM _λ ⁿ obtained by a motion ofC ₀ alongc(t). We shall denote it byC ^PorC ^Fif it is obtained by a parallel or Frenet motion, respectively. We get a formula for volume(C). Among other consequences of this formula we get that, ifc(0) is the centre of mass ofC ₀, then volume(C) ≥ volume(C),^P),and the equality holds whenC ₀ is contained in a geodesic sphere or the motion corresponds to a curve contained in a hyperplane of the Lie algebraO(n−1) (whenn=3, the only motion with these properties is the parallel motion). Work partially supported by a DGES Grant No. PB97-1425 and a AGIGV Grant No. GR0052.     

Bounding the First Dirichlet Eigenvalue of a Tube Around a Complex Submanifold of ℂP n (λ) in Terms of the Degrees of the Polynomials Defining It

We obtain upper bounds for the first Dirichlet eigenvalue of a tube around a complex submanifold P of ?P ⁿ (λ) which depends only on the radius of the tube, the degrees of the polynomials defining P, and the first eigenvalue of the tube around some model centers. The bounds are sharp on these models. Moreover, when the models used are ?P ^q (λ) or Q ^n?1(λ) these bounds also provide gap phenomena and comparison results.     

Pappus type theorems for motions along a submanifold

We study the volumes volume(D) of a domain D and volume(C) of a hypersurface C obtained by a motion along a submanifold P of a space form Mⁿ_λ. We show: (a) volume(D) depends only on the second fundamental form of P, whereas volume(C) depends on all the ith fundamental forms of P, (b) when the domain that we move D₀ has its q-centre of mass on P, volume(D) does not depend on the mean curvature of P, (c) when D₀ is q-symmetric, volume(D) depends only on the intrinsic curvature tensor of P; and (d) if the image of P by the ln of the motion (in a sense which is well-defined) is not contained in a hyperplane of the Lie algebra of SO(n−q−d), and C is closed, then volume(C) does not depend on the ith fundamental forms of P for i>2 if and only if the hypersurface that we move is a revolution hypersurface (of the geodesic (n−q)-plane orthogonal to P) around a d-dimensional geodesic plane.     

On the Volume of a Domain Obtained by a Holomorphic Motion Along a Complex Curve

Let D be a domain obtained by a holomorphic motion of a domain D _p M _p ^n–1 along a complex curve P in a complex space form M ⁿ . We prove that, if n= 2, the volume of D depends only on the geometry of D _p and the intrinsic geometry of P, but not on the extrinsic geometry of P. When M is closed (compact without boundary), then the dependence on P is only through its topology. When n > 2, and for arbitrary domains D _p, a similar result holds only for Frenet motions, but when D _p has certain integral symmetries (and only in this case) this result is still true for any motion .