Ring‐opening metathesis polymerization of amino acid‐functionalized norbornene derivatives

Amino acid‐derived novel norbornene derivatives, N,N′‐(endo‐bicyclo[2.2.1] hept‐5‐en‐2,3‐diyldicarbonyl) bis‐L ‐alanine methyl ester (NBA), N,N′‐(endo‐bicyclo[2.2.1]hept‐5‐en‐2,3‐diyldicarbonyl) bis‐L ‐leucine methyl ester (NBL), N,N′‐(endo‐bicyclo[2.2.1]hept‐5‐en‐2,3‐diyldicarbonyl) bis‐L ‐phenylalanine methyl ester (NBF) were synthesized and polymerized using the Grubbs 2nd generation ruthenium (Ru) catalyst. Although NBA, NBL, and NBF did not undergo homopolymerization, they underwent copolymerization with norbornene (NB) to give the copolymers with M_n ranging from 5200 to 38,100. The maximum incorporation ratio of the amino acid‐based unit was 9%, and the cis contents of the main chain were 54–66%. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 44: 5337–5343, 2006     

Synthesis and copolymerization of oligo(lactic acid) derived norbornene macromonomers with amino acid derived norbornene monomer: Formation of the 3D macroporous scaffold

Norbornene macromonomers 2 and 3 bearing 10‐ and 20‐mers of lactide were synthesized by ring‐opening polymerization of lactide using 5‐norbornene‐2, 3‐exo‐exo‐dimethanol as an initiator and DBU as a catalyst. Macromonomers 2 and 3 were copolymerized with amino acid derived norbornene monomer 1 , using the Grubbs 2nd generation ruthenium catalyst. The random and block copolymers with M_n's ranging from 28,000 to 180,000 were obtained almost quantitatively where the M_n's of the block copolymers were higher than those of the random ones. Three‐dimensional macroporous structure polymers with average pore size of 10 µm could be found in poly( 1 ) and the block co‐polymer of 1 and 2 or 1 and 3 at the high ratio of 1 . Meanwhile, poly( 2 ) and poly( 3 ) along with block and random copolymers with low ratio of 1 exhibit much larger pores in the range of 50–300 µm. The porosity increased with increase in the unit ratio of 1 . The compressive strength of the porous structure of poly( 2 ) and poly( 3 ) was improved by the copolymerization with 1 . © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 2015 , 53, 1660–1670