全文获取类型
收费全文 | 162篇 |
免费 | 3篇 |
专业分类
化学 | 50篇 |
力学 | 3篇 |
数学 | 19篇 |
物理学 | 93篇 |
出版年
2021年 | 1篇 |
2018年 | 1篇 |
2015年 | 2篇 |
2014年 | 3篇 |
2013年 | 5篇 |
2012年 | 1篇 |
2011年 | 7篇 |
2010年 | 2篇 |
2009年 | 2篇 |
2008年 | 3篇 |
2007年 | 9篇 |
2006年 | 1篇 |
2005年 | 5篇 |
2004年 | 4篇 |
2002年 | 8篇 |
2001年 | 7篇 |
2000年 | 9篇 |
1999年 | 6篇 |
1998年 | 5篇 |
1997年 | 2篇 |
1996年 | 9篇 |
1995年 | 7篇 |
1994年 | 19篇 |
1993年 | 15篇 |
1992年 | 8篇 |
1990年 | 1篇 |
1989年 | 1篇 |
1988年 | 6篇 |
1987年 | 5篇 |
1986年 | 1篇 |
1985年 | 1篇 |
1983年 | 1篇 |
1980年 | 1篇 |
1977年 | 3篇 |
1976年 | 3篇 |
1969年 | 1篇 |
排序方式: 共有165条查询结果,搜索用时 0 毫秒
1.
This paper reports our results for the direct experimental determination of the equilibrium constant for the hydrogen-isotope-exchange
reaction, 1/2D2(g)+HCl(hexOH)=1/2H2(g)+DCl(hexOD), where hexOH isn-hexanol and hexOD isn-hexanol with deuterium substitution in the alcohol function. The reaction was studied in electrochemical double cells without
liquid junction for which the net cell reaction is the above isotope-exchange reaction. The experimentally determined value
of ε° (296.0°K) for this cell is 4.03±0.95 mV (strong electrolyte standard states, mole-fraction composition scale); the value
of the equilibrium constant for the reaction is 1.17±0.05. The contributions of isotope-exchange and transfer effects to the
magnitude of the standard Gibbs energy change for the above reaction and for the analogous reaction 1/2D2(g)+HCl(aq)=DCl(daq)+1/2H2(g) are considered. Our results support the conclusion of Heinzinger and Weston that the formulation of the solvated proton
in water as H3O+, as opposed to H9O4
+, is sufficient for the interpretation of the thermodynamics of hydrogen-isotope-exchange reactions in water. We also find
that the formulation of the solvated proton inn-hexanol as ROH
2
+
is sufficient for the interpretation of our results on the thermodynamics of hydrogen-isotope-exchange inn-hexanol. 相似文献
2.
Makins NC Ent R Chapman MS Hansen J Lee K Milner RG Nelson J Arnold RG Bosted PE Keppel CE Lung A Rock SE Spengos M Szalata ZM Tao LH White JL Coulter KP Geesaman DF Holt RJ Jackson HE Papavassiliou V Potterveld DH Zeidman B Arrington J Beise EJ Belz E Filippone BW Gao H Lorenzon W Mueller B McKeown RD O'Neill TG Epstein M Margaziotis DJ Napolitano J Kinney E Anthony PL van Bibber K Dietrich FS Gearhart RA Patratos GG Kuhn SE van den Brand JF Bulten H Jones CE 《Physical review letters》1994,72(13):1986-1989
3.
Alves GA Amato S Anjos JC Appel JA Astorga J Bracker SB Cremaldi LM Darling CL Dixon RL Errede D Fenker HC Gay C Green DR Halling AM Jedicke R Karchin PE Kwan S Leuking LH Mantsch PM de Mello Neto JR Metheny J Milburn RH de Miranda JM da Motta Filho H Napier A Passmore D Rafatian A dos Reis AC Ross WR Santoro AF Sheaff M Souza MH Spalding WJ Stoughton C Streetman ME Summers DJ Takach SF Wallace A Wu Z 《Physical review D: Particles and fields》1994,49(9):R4317-R4320
4.
Anthony JM Garrett 《Contemporary Physics》2013,54(2):163-165
The dynamic electronic structure of atoms and molecules can be directly observed by means of the (e, 2e) reaction, which measures the distribution of energies and momenta of two electrons in coincidence after a knockout reaction initiated by an electron beam of known momentum incident on a molecular gas target. The molecular state for each event is identified by the electron separation energy. The recoil momentum for each event is known from the difference of measured initial and final momenta. It has been verified that values of this momentum are equal under suitable conditions to the momentum of the electron in the target immediately before knockout. Thus the spherically-averaged electron momentum distribution for each molecular orbital is measured. This is directly related to molecular orbitals calculated by the methods of quantum chemistry. Properties obtained by this method for different types of molecules are discussed. 相似文献
5.
6.
7.
8.
Alves GA Amato S Anjos JC Appel JA Astorga J Bracker SB Cremaldi LM Dagenhart WD Darling CL Dixon RL Errede D Fenker HC Gay C Green DR Jedicke R Karchin PE Kennedy C Kwan S Lueking LH de Mello Neto JR Metheny J Milburn RH de Miranda JM da Motta Filho H Napier A Passmore D Rafatian A dos Reis AC Ross WR Santoro AF Sheaff M Souza MH Spalding WJ Stoughton C Streetman ME Summers DJ Takach SF Wallace A Wu Z 《Physical review letters》1996,77(12):2388-2391
9.
Anthony PL Arnold RG Band HR Borel H Bosted PE Breton V Cates GD Chupp TE Dietrich FS Dunne J Erbacher R Fellbaum J Fonvieille H Gearhart R Holmes R Hughes EW Johnson JR Kawall D Keppel C Kuhn SE Lombard-Nelsen RM Marroncle J Maruyama T Meyer W Meziani Z Middleton H Morgenstern J Newbury NR Petratos GG Pitthan R Prepost R Roblin Y Rock SE Rokni SH Shapiro G Smith T Souder PA Spengos M Staley F Stuart LM Szalata ZM Terrien Y Thompson AK White JL Woods M Xu J Young CC Zapalac G 《Physical review D: Particles and fields》1996,54(11):6620-6650
10.