排序方式: 共有29条查询结果,搜索用时 312 毫秒
1.
Alexopoulos T Allen C Anderson EW Areti H Banerjee S Beery PD Biswas NN Bujak A Carmony DD Carter T Cole P Choi Y De Bonte RJ Erwin AR Findeisen C Goshaw AT Gutay LJ Hirsch AS Hojvat C Kenney VP Lindsey CS LoSecco JM McMahon T McManus AP Morgan N Nelson KS Oh SH Piekarz J Porile NT Reeves D Scharenberg RP Stampke SR Stringfellow BC Thompson MA Turkot F Walker WD Wang CH Wesson DK 《Physical review letters》1990,64(9):991-994
2.
Lazarus EA Navratil GA Greenfield CM Strait EJ Austin ME Burrell KH Casper TA Baker DR DeBoo JC Doyle EJ Durst R Ferron JR Forest CB Gohil P Groebner RJ Heidbrink WW Hong R Houlberg WA Howald AW Hsieh C Hyatt AW Jackson GL Kim J Lao LL Lasnier CJ Leonard AW Lohr J La Haye RJ Maingi R Miller RL Murakami M Osborne TH Perkins LJ Petty CC Rettig CL Rhodes TL Rice BW Sabbagh SA Schissel DP Scoville JT Snider RT Staebler GM Stallard BW Stambaugh RD St John HE Stockdale RE Taylor PL Thomas DM 《Physical review letters》1996,77(13):2714-2717
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Extensive new high-temperature, high-resolution FTIR emission spectroscopy measurements for the five common isotopomers of GeO are combined with previous diode laser and microwave measurements in combined isotopomer analyses. New Dunham expansion parameters and an accurate analytical potential energy function are determined for the ground X1Sigma+ state. Copyright 1999 Academic Press. 相似文献
9.
10.
Fleischer H Wann DA Hinchley SL Borisenko KB Lewis JR Mawhorter RJ Robertson HE Rankin DW 《Dalton transactions (Cambridge, England : 2003)》2005,(19):3221-3228
The molecular structures of Se(SCH(3))(2) and Te(SCH(3))(2) were investigated using gas-phase electron diffraction (GED) and ab initio and DFT geometry optimisations. While parameters involving H atoms were refined using flexible restraints according to the SARACEN method, parameters that depended only on heavy atoms could be refined without restraints. The GED-determined geometric parameters (r(h1)) are: rSe-S 219.1(1), rS-C 183.2(1), rC-H 109.6(4) pm; angleS-Se-S 102.9(3), angleSe-S-C 100.6(2), angleS-C-H (mean) 107.4(5), phiS-Se-S-C 87.9(20), phiSe-S-C-H 178.8(19) degrees for Se(SCH(3))(2), and rTe-S 238.1(2), rS-C 184.1(3), rC-H 110.0(6) pm; angleS-Te-S 98.9(6), angleTe-S-C 99.7(4), angleS-C-H (mean) 109.2(9), phiS-Te-S-C 73.0(48), phiTe-S-C-H 180.1(19) degrees for Te(SCH(3))(2). Ab initio and DFT calculations were performed at the HF, MP2 and B3LYP levels, employing either full-electron basis sets [3-21G(d) or 6-31G(d)] or an effective core potential with a valence basis set [LanL2DZ(d)]. The best fit to the GED structures was achieved at the MP2 level. Differences between GED and MP2 results for rS-C and angleS-Te-S were explained by the thermal population of excited vibrational states under the experimental conditions. All theoretical models agreed that each compound exists as two stable conformers, one in which the methyl groups are on the same side (g(+)g(-) conformer) and one in which they are on different sides (g(+)g(+) conformer) of the S-Y-S plane (Y = Se, Te). The conformational composition under the experimental conditions could not be resolved from the GED data. Despite GED R-factors and ab initio and DFT energies favouring the g(+)g(+) conformer, it is likely that both conformers are present, for Se(SCH(3))(2) as well as for Te(SCH(3))(2). 相似文献