排序方式： 共有55条查询结果，搜索用时 62 毫秒
1.
Soderstrom E McKenna JA Abrams GS Adolphsen CE Averill D Ballam J Barish BC Barklow T Barnett BA Bartelt J Bethke S Blockus D Bonvicini G Boyarski A Brabson B Breakstone A Bulos F Burchat PR Burke DL Cence RJ Chapman J Chmeissani M Cords D Coupal DP Dauncey P DeStaebler HC Dorfan DE Dorfan JM Drewer DC Elia R Feldman GJ Fernandes D Field RC Ford WT Fordham C Frey R Fujino D Gan KK Gero E Gidal G Glanzman T Goldhaber G Gomez Cadenas JJ Gratta G Grindhammer G Grosse-Wiesmann P Hanson G Harr R 《Physical review letters》1990,64(25):2980-2983
2.
Komamiya S Abrams GS Adolphsen CE Averill D Ballam J Barish BC Barklow T Barnett BA Bartelt J Bethke S Blockus D Bonvicini G Boyarski A Brabson B Breakstone A Bulos F Burchat PR Burke DL Cence RJ Chapman J Chmeissani M Cords D Coupal DP Dauncey P DeStaebler HC Dorfan DE Dorfan JM Drewer DC Elia R Feldman GJ Fernandes D Field RC Ford WT Fordham C Frey R Fujino D Gan KK Gatto C Gero E Gidal G Glanzman T Goldhaber G Gomez Cadenas JJ Gratta G Grindhammer G Grosse-Wiesmann P Hanson G Harr R 《Physical review letters》1990,64(24):2881-2884
3.
4.
5.
Genetic algorithms have properties which make them attractive in de novo drug design. Like other de novo design programs, genetic algorithms require a method to reduce the enormous search space of possible compounds. Most often this is done using information from known ligands. We have developed the ADAPT program, a genetic algorithm which uses molecular interactions evaluated with docking calculations as a fitness function to reduce the search space. ADAPT does not require information about known ligands. The program takes an initial set of compounds and iteratively builds new compounds based on the fitness scores of the previous set of compounds. We describe the particulars of the ADAPT algorithm and its application to three well-studied target systems. We also show that the strategies of enhanced local sampling and re-introducing diversity to the compound population during the design cycle provide better results than conventional genetic algorithm protocols. 相似文献
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Schumm BA Koetke DS Adolphsen CE Alexander JP Averill D Barish BC Barklow T Barnett BA Blockus D Boyarski A Brabson B Breakstone A Bulos F Burchat PR Burke DL Cence RJ Chapman J Chmeissani M Cords D Coupal DP Dauncey P DeStaebler HC Dorfan JM Drell PS Drewer DC Durrett D Elia R Feldman GJ Field RC Ford WT Fordham C Frey R Fujino D Gan KK Gero E Gidal G Glanzman T Goldhaber G Gomez Cadenas JJ Gratta G Hanson G Harr R Harral B Harris FA Hayes K Hearty C Heusch CA Hildreth MD Himel T Hinshaw DA 《Physical review D: Particles and fields》1992,46(1):453-456