首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
文章检索
  按 检索   检索词:      
出版年份:   被引次数:   他引次数: 提示:输入*表示无穷大
  收费全文   12篇
  免费   0篇
化学   8篇
力学   3篇
物理学   1篇
  2022年   1篇
  2016年   1篇
  2015年   1篇
  2009年   1篇
  1933年   2篇
  1925年   1篇
  1913年   1篇
  1911年   1篇
  1909年   1篇
  1897年   2篇
排序方式: 共有12条查询结果,搜索用时 24 毫秒
1.
2.
3.
4.
The mechanical response of engineering materials evaluated through continuum fracture mechanics typically assumes that a crack or void initially exists, but it does not provide information about the nucleation of such flaws in an otherwise flawless microstructure. How such flaws originate, particularly at grain (or phase) boundaries is less clear. Experimentally, “good” vs. “bad” grain boundaries are often invoked as the reasons for critical damage nucleation, but without any quantification. The state of knowledge about deformation at or near grain boundaries, including slip transfer and heterogeneous deformation, is reviewed to show that little work has been done to examine how slip interactions can lead to damage nucleation. A fracture initiation parameter developed recently for a low ductility model material with limited slip systems provides a new definition of grain boundary character based upon operating slip and twin systems (rather than an interfacial energy based definition). This provides a way to predict damage nucleation density on a physical and local (rather than a statistical) basis. The parameter assesses the way that highly activated twin systems are aligned with principal stresses and slip system Burgers vectors. A crystal plasticity-finite element method (CP-FEM) based model of an extensively characterized microstructural region has been used to determine if the stress–strain history provides any additional insights about the relationship between shear and damage nucleation. This analysis shows that a combination of a CP-FEM model augmented with the fracture initiation parameter shows promise for becoming a predictive tool for identifying damage-prone boundaries.  相似文献   
5.
Literatur     
Harries  C.  Hofmann  Fritz  Ditmar  R.  Backer  H. J.  Stark  J.  Ruggli  P.  Nierenstein  M.  Donath  E.  Indra  A.  Eisenlohr  F.  Pitaval  M. R.  Hoffmann  F.  Danneel  H.  Meyer  J.  Fischer  Franz  Rinne  F.  Block  W.  Riemann  C.  Buchner  G.  Hinneberg  P.  v. Meyer  E.  Engler  C.  Wöhler  L.  Wallach  O.  Luther  R.  Nernst  W.  Blanc  M. Le  Kossel  A.  Kellner  O.  Immendorff  H.  Witt  O. N. 《Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry》1913,52(10-11):664-668
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry -  相似文献   
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号