Pentopyranosyl Oligonucleotide Systems. 9th Communication

Pyranosyl‐RNA (‘p‐RNA’ ) is an oligonucleotide system isomeric to natural RNA and composed of the very same building blocks as RNA. Its generational, chemical, and informational properties are deemed to be those of an alternative nucleic acid system that could have been a candidate in Nature's evolutionary choice of the molecular basis of genetic function. We consider the study of the chemistry of p‐RNA as etiologically relevant in the sense that knowledge of its structural, chemical, and informational properties on the chemical level offers both a perspective and reference points for the recognition of specific structural assets of the RNA structure that made it the (supposedly) superior system among possible alternatives and, therefore, the system that became part of biology as we know it today. The paper describes the chemical synthesis of β‐d‐ (and L )‐ribopyranosyl‐(4′→2′)‐oligonucleotide sequences, presents a resume of their structural and chemical properties, and cautiously discusses what we may and may not have learned from the pyranosyl isomer of RNA with respect to the conundrum of RNA's origin.     

Investigation of the enzymatic and nonenzymatic cope rearrangement of carbaprephenate to carbachorismate

The dimethyl esters of carbaprephenate and 4-epi-carbaprephenate were prepared by modification of published procedures. In methanol these compounds are converted quantitatively to isomeric 6-hydroxytricyclo[3.3.1.0(2,7)]non-3-en-1,3-dimethyl esters via a two-step sequence involving an initial Cope rearrangement, followed by intramolecular Diels-Alder reaction of the dimethyl carbachorismate or 4-epi-carbachorismate intermediates. Carbaprephenate and its epimer were obtained by alkaline hydrolysis of the corresponding dimethyl esters. These compounds, in contrast to their ester precursors, undergo spontaneous acid-catalyzed decarboxylation in aqueous solution. Only at high pH does the Cope rearrangement compete with decarboxylation. At pH 12 and 90 degrees C, carbaprephenate slowly rearranges to carbachorismate, which rapidly loses water to give 3-(2-carboxyallyl)benzoic acid as the major product. A small amount of the intramolecular Diels-Alder adduct derived from carbachorismate is also observed by NMR as a minor product. Carbaprephenate is not a substrate for the enzyme chorismate mutase from Bacillus subtilis (BsCM), nor does carbaprephenate inhibit the normal chorismate mutase activity of this enzyme, even when present in 200-fold excess over chorismate. Its low affinity for the enzyme-active site is presumably a consequence of placing a methylene group rather than an oxygen atom proximal to the essential cationic residue Arg90. Nevertheless, BsCM variants that lack this cation (R90G and R90A) do not accelerate the Cope rearrangement of carbaprephenate either, and a catalytic antibody 1F7, which exhibits modest chorismate mutase activity, is similarly inactive. Poor substrate binding and the relatively high barrier for the Cope compared to the Claisen rearrangement presumably account for the lack of detectable catalysis. Acceleration of this sigmatropic rearrangement apparently requires more than an active site that is complementary in shape to the reactive substrate conformer.     

Probing the Helical Secondary Structure of Short-Chain β-Peptides

Structural prerequisites for the stability of the 3₁ helix of β-peptides can be defined from inspection of models (Figs. 1 and 2): lateral non-H-substituents in 2- and 3-position on the 3-amino-acid residues of the helix are allowed, axial ones are forbidden. To be able to test this prediction, we synthesized a series of heptapeptide derivatives Boc-(β-HVal-β-HAla-β-HLeu-Xaa-β-HVal-β-HAla-β-HLeu)-OMe 13–22 (Xaa = α- or β-amino-acid residue) and a β-depsipeptide 25 with a central (S)-3-hydroxybutanoic-acid residue (Xaa = –OCH(Me)CH₂C(O)–) (Schemes 1 3). Detailed NMR analysis (DQF-COSY, HSQC, HMBC, ROESY, and TOCSY experiments) in methanol solution of the β-hexapeptide H(-β-HVal-β-HAla-β-HLeu)₂-OH ( 1 ) and of the β-heptapeptide H-β-HVal-β-HAla-β-HLeu-(S,S)-β-HAla(αMe)-β-HVal-β-HAla- β-HLeu-OH ( 22 ), with a central (2S,3S)-3-amino-2-methylbutanoic-acid residue, confirm the helical structure of such β-peptides (previously discovered in pyridine solution) (Fig.3 and Tables 1–5). The CD spectra of helical β-peptides, the residues of which were prepared by (retentive) Arndt-Eistert homologation of the (S)- or L -α-amino acids, show a trough at 215 nm. Thus, this characteristic pattern of the CD spectra was taken as an indicator for the presence of a helix in methanol solutions of compounds 13–22 and 25 (including partially and fully deprotected forms) (Figs.4–6). The results fully confirm predicted structural effects: incorporation of a single ‘wrong’ residue ((R)-β-HAla, β-HAib, (R,S)-β-HAla(α Me), or N-Me-β-HAla) in the central position of the β-heptapeptide derivatives A (see 17, 18, 20 , or 21 , resp.) causes the CD minimum to disappear. Also, the β-heptadepsipetide 25 (missing H-bond) and the β-heptapeptide analogs with a single α-amino-acid moiety in the middle ( 13 and 14 ) are not helical, according to this analysis. An interesting case is the heptapeptide 15 with the central achiral, unsubstituted 3-aminopropanoic-acid moiety: helical conformation appears to depend upon the presence or absence of terminal protection and upon the solvent (MeOH vs. MeOH/H₂O).     

β‐Peptidic Secondary Structures Fortified and Enforced by Zn2+ Complexation – On the Way to β‐Peptidic Zinc Fingers?

The correlation between β²‐, β³‐, and β^2,3‐amino acid‐residue configuration and stability of helix and hairpin‐turn secondary structures of peptides consisting of homologated proteinogenic amino acids is analyzed (Figs. 1–3). To test the power of Zn²⁺ ions in fortifying and/or enforcing secondary structures of β‐peptides, a β‐decapeptide, 1 , four β‐octapeptides, 2 – 5 , and a β‐hexadecapeptide, 10 , have been devised and synthesized. The design was such that the peptides would a) fold to a 14‐helix ( 1 and 3 ) or a hairpin turn ( 2 and 4 ), or form neither of these two secondary structures (i.e., 5 ), and b) carry the side chains of cysteine and histidine in positions, which will allow Zn²⁺ ions to use their extraordinary affinity for RS^? and the imidazole N‐atoms for stabilizing or destabilizing the intrinsic secondary structures of the peptides. The β‐hexadecapeptide 10 was designed to a) fold to a turn, to which a 14‐helical structure is attached through a β‐dipeptide spacer, and b) contain two cysteine and two histidine side chains for Zn complexation, in order to possibly mimic a Zn‐finger motif. While CD spectra (Figs. 6–8 and 17) and ESI mass spectra (Figs. 9 and 18) are compatible with the expected effects of Zn²⁺ ions in all cases, it was shown by detailed NMR analyses of three of the peptides, i.e., 2, 3, 5 , in the absence and presence of ZnCl₂, that i) β‐peptide 2 forms a hairpin turn in H₂O, even without Zn complexation to the terminal β³hHis and β³hCys side chains (Fig. 11), ii) β‐peptide 3 , which is present as a 14‐helix in MeOH, is forced to a hairpin‐turn structure by Zn complexation in H₂O (Fig. 12), and iii) β‐peptide 5 is poorly ordered in CD₃OH (Fig. 13) and in H₂O (Fig. 14), with far‐remote β³hCys and β³hHis residues, and has a distorted turn structure in the presence of Zn²⁺ ions in H₂O, with proximate terminal Cys and His side chains (Fig. 15).     

Coenzyme F430 from Methanogenic Bacteria: Mechanistic studies on the reductive cleavage of sulfonium ions catalyzed by F430 pentamethyl ester

Mechanistic questions regarding the reductive cleavage of sulfonium ions by the Ni^I form of coenzyme F430 pentamethyl ester (F430M) were addressed in a series of kinetic studies and isotope labeling experiments. In neat DMF, methane formation from dialkyl(methyl)sulfonium ions consistently showed a delay time of ca. 1 h. In the presence of excess propanethiol, no delay was observed and methane formation followed pseudo-first-order kinetics with a logarithmic dependence of the initial rate on the concentration of propanethiol. From the temperature dependence of the reaction rate, an estimate for the activation parameters of ΔH^# = 49 kJ mol^?1 and (apparent) ΔS# = –114 J K^?1 mol^?1 was derived. The observation of deuterium incorporation into methane from (CH₃)₂CHOD, but not from (CH₃)₂CDOH, indicates that the fourth H-entity is introduced into CH₄ as a proton, and that free CH₃ radicals are not involved. In contrast to the reaction with the homogeneous one-electron reductant sodium naphthalide, the F430M-catalyzed reduction of mixed dialkyl(methyl)sulfonium ions showed a pronounced selectivity for the cleavage of Me? S over that of alkyl-S (alkyl ≠ Me) bonds. Mechanisms that are consistent with these results, as well as possible explanations for the time delay and the apparent highly negative entropy of activation, are discussed.     

The Effect of Fluoro Substitution upon the β‐Hairpin Fold of a β‐Tetrapeptide in Methanol

The importance of β‐peptides lies in their ability to mimic the conformational behavior of α‐peptides, even with a much shorter chain length, and in their resistance to proteases. To investigate the effect of substitution of β‐peptides on their dominant fold, we have carried out a molecular‐dynamics (MD) simulation study of two tetrapeptides, Ac‐(2R,3S)‐β^2,3hVal(αMe)‐(2S)‐β²hPhe‐(R)‐β³hLys‐(2R,3S)‐β^2,3‐Ala(αMe)‐NH₂, differing in the substitution at the C_α of Phe2 (pepF with F, and pepH with H). Three simulations, unrestrained (UNRES), using ³J‐coupling biasing with local elevation in combination with either instantaneous (INS) or time‐averaging (AVE) NOE distance restraining, were carried out for each peptide. In the unrestrained simulations, we find three (pepF) and two (pepH) NOE distance bound violations of maximally 0.22 nm that involve the terminal residues. The restrained simulations match both the NOE distance bounds and ³J‐values derived from experiment. The fluorinated peptide shows a slightly larger conformational variability than the non‐fluorinated one.