温公颐中国逻辑史研究方法论初探

温公颐先生中国逻辑史研究的方法论涉及一般原则和具体方法两个层面。其中,一般原则主要包括"贵有创见"、实事求是和发展的观点3个方面。具体方法主要有比较的方法、语言学的方法以及逻辑与历史统一的方法等。温公颐中国逻辑史研究的方法论,在一定意义上是对近代以来中国逻辑史研究中简单比附这一思路与方法的有力矫正。     

低进汽压力下超音速两相流升压特性实验研究

本文采用实验方法研究了进汽压力为0.2 MPa以下时,由蒸汽喷嘴、混合腔及相应的阀门和管道组成超音速汽液两相流升压加热装置的运行特性。实验表明在进汽压力为0.1 MPa-0.2 MPa时,超音速汽液两相流升压加热装置都可稳定可靠地运行,且升压效果明显,可满足电力、供暖、轻工等许多行业蒸汽加热的要求。     

在虚实之间:以《搜神记》为例谈六朝志怪小说的文体特征

~~在虚实之间:以《搜神记》为例谈六朝志怪小说的文体特征@周昌梅$孝感学院文学院!湖北孝感432000~~~~[1]鲁迅.中国小说史略[M].杭州:浙江文艺出版社，2000. [2]张庆民.论蜕变中的魏晋南北朝小说[J].首都师范大学学报，1999，(4). [3]徐公持.魏晋文学史[M].北京:人民文学     

《西北学术》的科技内容及其主旨

运用科学史研究方法，对《西北大学学报》的前身之一《西北学术》的科技史价值和办刊宗旨进行讨论。认为该刊为20世纪40年代西北大学的最高学术论坛，其有关西北国防化、西北学术思想、西北地理、西北物理学会的研究和活动等内容，突出了西北大学的区域特色。     

上天入地：思想史的边界与方法

思想史的研究方法与研究对象有十分密切的关系。通常情况下,研究对象多少已经决定了合宜的方法。甚至可以说,合宜的方法内在于对象,至少是内在于主体和对象的关系。思想史的研究有两条边界,一条是向上的通向哲学、形而上精神的世界;另一条是向下深挖的通向社会的、形而下生活的世界。思想史的这两条边界决定了思想史研究的主要方法取向。     

流动注射-ICP光谱分析中的基体效应和酸效应研究

本文讨论了流动注射-ICP光谱分析中的基体效应和酸效应。当基体(Na、Ca、Fe、Zn)的浓度大于5mg/ml时,待测元素的谱线强度表现出不同程度的降低;上述基体的引入对激发温度和电子密度的影响不明显;基体产生的抑制效应可能与改变了待测元素粒子的激发几率的因素有关;于载流体中加入一定量的基体元素,是消除或降低基体效应的有效方法。酸(HCl、HNO_3、H_2SO_4)对待测元素表现出不同程度的抑制效应,其主要原因是物理干扰所致。     

The many facets of linear programming

We examine the history of linear programming from computational, geometric, and complexity points of view, looking at simplex, ellipsoid, interior-point, and other methods. Received: June 22, 2000 / Accepted: April 4, 2001?Published online October 2, 2001     

Modeling of RF plasma torch with a metallic tube inserted for reactant injection

Flow, temperature, and electromagnetic (EM) fields in a radio-frequency thermal plasma torch designed for the preparation of superconducting powders or films have been analysed by using a new two-dimensional modeling approach with the electric field intensity as the fundamental EM field variable. The insertion of a stainless steel injection tube into the torch leads to large induction currents in this tube. Although such large induction currents cause pronounced changes of the EM fields near the injection tube, flow and temperature fields are little affected. There exists only one large toroidal vortex in the upper part of the present torch, while the maximum temperature appears at an off-axis location within the coil region.     

引射式射流风机结构参数的研究

根据地下通风工程以较小的能耗获得较大风量的需要，运用流体力学的基本理论和模型试验研究方法，系统研究了引射式射流风的通风原理和结构参数，为引射式射流风机的设计提供依据。     

Constructing Space for Science at the Royal Institution of Great Britain

Those who have worked in the Royal Institution of Great Britain have, since its foundation in 1799, made significant contributions to scientific knowledge, to its practical application, and to its communication to a wide variety of audiences. Such work cannot be carried out in an architectural vacuum, and in this paper we examine how the buildings of the Royal Institution, 20 and 21 Albemarle Street in central London, have shaped the work undertaken within its walls and how, on a number of occasions, the buildings have been reconfigured to take account of the evolving needs of scientific research and communication. This paper is based on the Conservation Plan of the Royal Institution that we wrote during 2003. The Conservation Plan did not examine the land owned by the Royal Institution to the north (i.e., 22 and 23 Albemarle Street; for this area see Richard Garnier, “Grafton Street, Mayfair,” Georgian Group Journal 13 (2003), 210–272), but it did discuss 18 and 19 Albemarle Street. In this paper we concentrate on the core Royal Institution buildings at 20 and 21 Albemarle Street. Other studies of the relationship of architecture,space, and science include Crosbie Smith and Jon Agar, ed., Making Space for Science: Territorial Themes in the Shaping of Knowledge (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1997); Peter Galison and Emily Thompson, ed., The Architecture of Science (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1999); and Sophie Forgan,“The architecture of science and the idea of a university,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 20 (1989), 405–434. Frank A.J.L. James is Professor of the History of Science at the Royal Institution; he has written widely on the history of nineteenth-century science in its social and cultural contexts and is editor of the Correspondence of Michael Faraday. He is President of the British Society for the History of Science. Anthony Peers is an Associate of Rodney Melville and Partners where he works in the field of building conservation as an architectural historian. He is a Council member of the Ancient Monument Society.