Three-dimensional Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship Analyses of a Series of Butenolide ETA Antagonists

Two kinds of Three-dimensional Quantitative Structure-activity Relationship(3D-QSAR) methods,comparative molecular filed analysis(CoMFA) and comparative molecular similarity indices analysis (CoMSIA) ,were applied to analyze the structure-activity relationship of a series of 63 butenolide ETA selective antagonists with respect to their inhibition against human ETA receptor,The CoMFA and CoMSIA models were developed for the conceivable alignment of the molecules based on a template structure from the crystallized data.The statistical results from the initial orientation of the aligned molecules show that the 3D-QSAR model from CoMFA(q^2=0.543) is obviously superior to that from the conventional CoMSIA(q^2=0.407).In order to refine the model,all-space search (ASS) was applied to minimize the field sampling process.By rotating and translating the molecular aggregate within the grid systematically,all the possible samplings of the molecular fields were tested and subsequently the one with the highest q^2 was picked out .The comparison of the sensitivity of CoMFA and CoMSIA to different space orientation shows that the CoMFA q^2 values are more sensitive to the translations and rotations of the aligned molecules with respect to the lattice than those of CoMSIA.The best CoMFA model from ASS was further refined by the region focused technique.The high quality of the best model is indicated by the high corss-validated correlation and the prediction on the external test set.The CoMFA coefficient contour plots identify several key features that explain the wide range of activities,which may help us to design new effective ETA selective antagonists.     

Three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity and structure-selectivity relationships of dihydrofolate reductase inhibitors

Three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship (3D-QSAR) modelling using comparative molecular similarity indices analysis (CoMSIA) was applied to a series of 406 structurally diverse dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) inhibitors from Pneumocystis carinii (pc) and rat liver (rl). X-ray crystal structures of three inhibitors bound to pcDHFR were used for defining the alignment rule. For pcDHFR, a QSAR model containing 6 components was selected using leave-10%-out cross-validation (n= 240, q2 = 0.65), while a 4-component model was selected for rlDHFR (n= 237, q2 = 0.63); both include steric, electrostatic and hydrophobic contributions. The models were validated using a large test set, designed to maximise its diversity and to verify the predictive accuracy of models for extrapolation. The pcDHFR model has r2 = 0.60 and mean absolute error (MAE) = 0.57 for the test set after removing 4 outliers, and the rlDHFR model has r2 = 0.60 and MAE = 0.69 after removing 4 test set outliers. In addition, classification models predicting selectivity for pcDHFR over rlDHFR were developed using soft independent modelling by class analogy (SIMCA), with a selectivity ratio of 2 (IC50,rlDHFR/ IC50,pcDHFR) used for delimiting classes. A 5-component model including steric and electrostatic contributions has cross-validated and test set classification rates of 0.67 and 0.68 for selective inhibitors, and 0.85 and 0.72 for unselective inhibitors. The predictive accuracy of models, together with the identification of important contributions in QSAR and classification models, offer the possibility of designing potent selective inhibitors and estimating their activity prior to synthesis.     

Synthesis,biological activities and 3D-QSAR studies of (R)-2-phenyl-4,5-dihydrothiazole-4-carboxamide derivatives containing a sulfur ether moiety

A series of (R)-2-phenyl-4,5-dihydrothiazole-4-carboxamide derivatives containing a sulfur ether moiety were designed, synthesized, and tested for their antifungal activities against several phytopathogenic fungi. The established CoMSIA model could predict the antifungal activity.     

楝酰胺(Rocaglamide)类化合物的三维定量构效关系

采用比较分子力场分析(CoMFA)和比较分子相似因子分析(CoMSIA)方法,对训练集中的26个楝酰胺(Rocaglamide)类化合物进行了三维定量构效关系(3D-QSAR)研究,最终建立的CoMFA模型和CoMSlA模型的q<'2>分别为0.593和0.656.并对测试集中的5个化合物的生物活性进行了预测,结果表明...     

Comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA) and comparative molecular similarity indices analysis (CoMSIA) of thiazolone derivatives as hepatitis C virus NS5B polymerase allosteric inhibitors

Three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship (3D-QSAR) models for a series of thiazolone derivatives as novel inhibitors bound to the allosteric site of hepatitis C virus (HCV) NS5B polymerase were developed based on CoMFA and CoMSIA analyses. Two different conformations of the template molecule and the combinations of different CoMSIA field/fields were considered to build predictive CoMFA and CoMSIA models. The CoMFA and CoMSIA models with best predictive ability were obtained by the use of the template conformation from X-ray crystal structures. The best CoMFA and CoMSIA models gave q (2) values of 0.621 and 0.685, and r (2) values of 0.950 and 0.940, respectively for the 51 compounds in the training set. The predictive ability of the two models was also validated by using a test set of 16 compounds which gave r (pred) (2) values of 0.685 and 0.822, respectively. The information obtained from the CoMFA and CoMSIA 3D contour maps enables the interpretation of their structure-activity relationship and was also used to the design of several new inhibitors with improved activity.     

Ligand and structure‐based models for the prediction of ligand‐receptor affinities and virtual screenings: Development and application to the β2‐adrenergic receptor

In this study, we evaluated the applicability of ligand‐based and structure‐based models to quantitative affinity predictions and virtual screenings for ligands of the β₂‐adrenergic receptor, a G protein‐coupled receptor (GPCR). We also devised and evaluated a number of consensus models obtained through partial least square regressions, to combine the strengths of the individual components. In all cases, the bioactive conformation of each ligand was derived from molecular docking at the crystal structure of the receptor. We identified the most effective models applicable to the different scenarios, in the presence or in the absence of a training set. For ranking the affinity of closely related analogs when a training set is available, a ligand‐based consensus model (LI‐CM) seems to be the best choice, while the structure‐based MM‐GBSA score seems the best alternative in the absence of a training set. For virtual screening purposes, the structure‐based MM‐GBSA score was found to be the method of choice. Consensus models consistently had performances superior or close to those of the best individual components, and were endowed with a significantly increased robustness. Given multiple models with no a priori knowledge of their predictive capabilities, constructing a consensus model ensures results very close to those that the best model alone would have yielded. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Comput Chem 2010