Inverse portfolio problem with mean-deviation model

A Markowitz-type portfolio selection problem is to minimize a deviation measure of portfolio rate of return subject to constraints on portfolio budget and on desired expected return. In this context, the inverse portfolio problem is finding a deviation measure by observing the optimal mean-deviation portfolio that an investor holds. Necessary and sufficient conditions for the existence of such a deviation measure are established. It is shown that if the deviation measure exists, it can be chosen in the form of a mixed CVaR-deviation, and in the case of n risky assets available for investment (to form a portfolio), it is determined by a combination of (n + 1) CVaR-deviations. In the later case, an algorithm for constructing the deviation measure is presented, and if the number of CVaR-deviations is constrained, an approximate mixed CVaR-deviation is offered as well. The solution of the inverse portfolio problem may not be unique, and the investor can opt for the most conservative one, which has a simple closed-form representation.     

基于条件风险值准则的供应链回购契约协调策略

研究了由具有风险偏好的零售商和风险中性的供应商组成的两级供应链回购契约协调问题.针对具有风险偏好的零售商,考虑了风险中性、风险厌恶和风险喜好三种态度,建立了由风险厌恶程度和悲观系数两个参数描述的基于条件风险值(CVaR)的集成目标决策函数.推导了不同风险偏好态度下的零售商最优订货决策,分析了不同风险偏好参数下的零售商订货决策变化情况.给出了能够完全协调风险偏好零售商和风险中性供应商的供应链回购契约协调机制.最后,进行了数值计算,验证了设计的供应链回购契约协调策略的有效性.结果表明,在给出的回购契约协调机制下,考虑风险偏好情况下的零售商最优订货决策能够保证整个供应链系统实现最优绩效,而供应链成员期望利润却随不同的风险偏好参数而不同.     

震后初期应急物资短缺情景下的定位-路径问题研究

基于公平视角研究震后初期灾区应急物资短缺情景下的定位-路径问题(location-routing problem,LRP),综合考虑灾害级别、灾区应急路网不同程度损毁、需求点易损性与车辆随机行驶时间等因素,以单个需求点的最大损失最小作为应急物资分配的公平性衡量指标、以总配送时间最短作为应急物资配送的效率性衡量指标,在此基础上构建双目标LRP模型,并基于分层序列法思想设计一种二阶段混合启发式求解算法。最后,采用汶川地震之后的帐篷配送数据验证本文方法公平性与效率性兼顾。     

Scoring indices,top-truncated preferences,and splitting invariance

We present a new characterization of the class of weight-based scoring indices for ranking problems with top-truncated preferences. The main novel axiom is Splitting Invariance: if an alternative is split up into a number of distinct yet unranked alternatives, then the total score of these alternatives should increase by the score of the original alternative, and the scores of the other alternatives should not change.