A converse of Loewner–Heinz inequality and applications to operator means

Let f(t)$f(t)$ be an operator monotone function. Then A?B$A?B$ implies f(A)?f(B)$f(A)?f(B)$, but the converse implication is not true. Let A?B$A?B$ be the geometric mean of A,B?0$A,B?0$. If A?B$A?B$, then B⁻¹?A?I$B^{-1}?A?I$; the converse implication is not true either. We will show that if f(λB+I)⁻¹?f(λA+I)?I$f{(\lambda B+I)}^{-1}?f(\lambda A+I)?I$ for all sufficiently small λ>0$\lambda >0$, then f(λA+I)?f(λB+I)$f(\lambda A+I)?f(\lambda B+I)$ and A?B$A?B$. Moreover, we extend it to multi-variable matrices means.     

A new Brézis‐Gallouët‐Wainger inequality from the viewpoint of the real interpolation functors

The Brézis‐Gallouët‐Wainger inequality describes a subtle embedding property into . The relation between the Brézis‐Gallouët‐Wainger inequality and the real interpolation functor together with the sharpness of the results is discussed in the present paper. As our first main results shows, it turns out that there are two intermediate terms between and the logarithmic boundedness, which is supposed to be the right‐hand side of the Brézis‐Gallouët‐Wainger inequality. As the second result, the first result is extended to inequalities which reflect the meaning of the second index of Besov spaces and the interpolation theorem.     

Small Embeddings of Partial Steiner Triple Systems

It was proved in 2009 that any partial Steiner triple system of order u has an embedding of order v for each admissible . This result is best possible in the sense that, for each , there exists a partial Steiner triple system of order u that does not have an embedding of order v for any . Many partial Steiner triple systems do have embeddings of orders smaller than , but much less is known about when these embeddings exist. In this paper, we detail a method for constructing such embeddings. We use this method to show that each member of a wide class of partial Steiner triple systems has an embedding of order v for at least half (or nearly half) of the orders for which an embedding could exist. For some members of this class we are able to completely determine the set of all orders for which the member has an embedding.     

Middle-school students’ concept images of geometric translations

This study explored sixth grade students’ concept images of geometric translations and the possible sources of their conceptions in a non-technological environment. The data were gathered through a written instrument, student and teacher interviews and document analyses. Analyses of student responses revealed two major concept images of geometric translations: (a) translation as translational motion, and (b) translation as both translational and rotational motion. Students who held these conceptions showed various levels of understanding, such as conceiving translations as undefined motion, partially-defined motion, and defined-motion of a single geometric figure on the plane. The findings of the study suggested, in general, consistencies between students’ concept images and their concept definitions. However, most of the students’ concept definitions were inconsistent with the formal concept definition of geometric translations.Data analyses also revealed five interpretations of a translation vector: (a) vector as a reference line, (b) vector as a symmetry line, (c) vector as a direction indicator, (d) vector as a parameter, and (e) vector as an abstract tool. Furthermore, classroom instruction, mathematics and science textbooks, real-life examples and everyday language were the major sources of students’ concept images of geometric translations.