线性代数教材改革指导思想探析

论述线性代数教材改革的必要性及其指导思想,主张线性代数教材建设应以矩阵为主线,以教育部颁发的硕士研究生人学考试线性代数部分的大纲为纲,结合教学现代化的现状,强调几何与代数相结合,重视代数学思想方法的渗透,化抽象为具体,同时在教学中还要引入数学建模的思想．     

Developing prospective teachers’ covariational reasoning through a model development sequence

Forming part of a wider research study, the current study investigated prospective middle school mathematics teachers’ ways of covariational reasoning on tasks involving simultaneously changing quantities. As the introductory theme of a larger unit on derivative, a model development sequence on covariational reasoning was designed and experimented with 20 participants in a mathematical modeling course offered to prospective teachers. The participants’ developing abilities of covariational reasoning were documented under three categories: (i) identifying the variables, (ii) ways of coordinating the variables, and (iii) ways of quantifying the rate of change. The results revealed significant improvement in the prospective teachers’ ways of identifying and coordinating the variables, and in quantifying the rate of change. Moreover, the results indicated that preference for a particular way of thinking in identifying and coordinating the variables determined the prospective teachers’ way of quantifying the rate of change and thereby their level of covariational reasoning.     

Three modes of STEM integration for middle school mathematics teachers

Of the four subjects in an integrated science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) approach, mathematics has not received enough focus. This could be in part because mathematics teachers may be apprehensive or unsure about how to implement integrated STEM education in their classrooms. There are benefits to integrated STEM in a mathematics classroom though, including increased motivation, interest, and achievement for students. This article discusses three methods that middle school mathematics teachers can utilize to integrate STEM subjects. By focusing on open‐ended problems through engineering design challenges, mathematical modeling, and mathematics integrated with technology middle school students are more likely to see mathematics as relevant and valuable. Important considerations are discussed as well as recent research with these approaches.     

Empirically supporting school STEM culture—The creation and validation of the STEM Culture Assessment Tool (STEM‐CAT)

School STEM Culture—an aspect of culture within a school community—is defined as the beliefs, values, practices, and resources in STEM fields as perceived by students, parents, teachers, and administrators and counselors within a school. This study validates the STEM Culture Assessment Tool (STEM‐CAT), an instrument intended to advance the use of the School STEM Culture construct within the research community. Internal consistency was determined through the use of Cronbach's alpha and factor analyses, and the instrument was found to be a reliable measure of School STEM Culture. The instrument can be used in future research to quantify School STEM Culture to determine if interventions change the culture of a school to further STEM education.     

Subitising activity relative to units construction: a case study

Subitising, a quick apprehension of the numerosity of a small set of items, has been found to change from an individual's reliance on perceptual to conceptual processes. In this study, we utilised a constructivist teaching experiment methodology to investigate how the subitising activity of one preschool student, Amy, related to her construction of prenumerical units. Subitising and counting tasks were designed to assess and perturb Amy's thinking relative to her construction of units, and to observe changes in Amy's activity associated with the different tasks. Findings indicate that as Amy's subitising activity changed from perceptual to conceptual, she constructed subitised motor units and subitised figurative units. Implications of this study suggest that the construction of subitised units may support young children's later development of arithmetic units.     

Probing interactions in exploratory teaching: a case study

This study investigates an exploratory teaching style used in an undergraduate geometry course to help students identify an ellipse. We attempt to probe beneath the surface of exploration to understand how the actions of teachers can contribute to developing students’ competence in justifying an ellipse. We analyse the complex interactions between student, content, and teacher, and discuss explicit pedagogical strategies that help students develop a higher level of geometric reasoning. The findings indicate that students engaged in guided explorations by the teacher and in group discussions with peers were able to identify an ellipse and justify their reasoning.     

Critical perspectives of the ‘new’ difference equation solution method of Rivera-Figueroa and Rivera-Rebolledo

Recently, claims of a ‘new and straightforward’ method of solution to second-order linear difference equations have appeared in the mathematics education literature from Rivera-Figueroa and Rivera-Rebolledo. The claim of novelty is based on an assumption that ‘since the equation is worked in its canonical form’, the method within this context must be new. In addition, the assertion of straightforwardness is based on the position that ‘the solution comes naturally’ through this method, rather than artificially. In this article, we subject these claims and assumptions to closer scrutiny, examination and analysis. We note that the method has been published before, and we present the method in a more succinct form. We also discuss how the method can be extended to solve difference equations with non-constant coefficients, illustrating this via a discussion of an example.     

A study of early career teachers’ practices related to language and language diversity during mathematics instruction

The role of language in mathematics teaching and learning is increasingly highlighted by standards and reform movements in the US. However, little is known about teachers’, and especially early career teachers’ (ECTs) practices and understandings related to language in mathematics instruction. This multiple case study explored the language-related understandings and practices of six ECTs in diverse elementary classrooms. Using iterative cycles of analysis, we found that all ECTs regularly attended to students’ mathematical vocabulary use and development. Yet, there was variability in ECTs’ focus on how to teach mathematical vocabulary, expectations for students’ precise use of mathematical terminology, and the use of multiple languages during instruction. These findings indicate that ECTs need more targeted support during teacher preparation and early career teaching in order to better support all students’ language development in the mathematics classroom.     

Novice facilitators’ changes in practices: From launching to managing discussions about mathematics teaching

Novice facilitators of professional development (PD) programs for mathematics teachers often face challenges in leading productive discussions and achieving the goals of these programs. Although research in this area is gradually accumulating, not much is known about how novice facilitators address these challenges and change their practices accordingly. This paper presents case studies of two novice facilitators of PD programs in two different countries. The analyses look at their work over one year, to illustrate the changes in their practices while managing discussions. The results show that although the facilitators operated in different contexts, their practices and their processes of change resembled, suggesting that these processes are not idiosyncratic. We argue that novice facilitators’ changes in practices correspond to changes in their resources, orientations, goals, and identities and that PD program teams can support these changes.     

Pre-university students square-root from squared things: A commognitive account of apparent conflicts within learners' mathematical discourses

This study explores the grasp of square roots among eleven students in a remedial mathematics course, with a special focus on where the same student generated apparently conflicting responses. Building on the commognitive framework, the analysis distinguished between routines that individual students consistently implemented in situations where roots “stood alone” and where they were incorporated in more compound exercises, where roots were extracted from square numbers and from squared radicands, where roots were applied to monomials and binomials, and where parameters named with different letters were involved. Differences were found in routines’ degree of objectification, procedures, and tasks. These differences are explained with a theoretical account, suggesting that what may seem as a conflict within a student’s discourse could be a sensible difference of actions taken in situations that this student construed as different. The contribution of this study to the body of knowledge on teaching and learning of roots and to commognitive research is discussed.