MULTIFRACTAL ANALYSIS OF PARTICLE-FLUID SYSTEM IN A CIRCULATING FLUIDIZED BED

In this paper, multifractal analysis together with wavelet transform modulus maxima (WTMM) method is used to analyze the fluctuating signals of circulating fluidized bed (CFB). Singularity spectrum shows that the gas-particle flow in CFB has multifractal character. Motion behavior of the particle-fluid system of CFB can be described by singularity spectrum. Intermittency index can be used to determine the transition of flow regime from fast fluidization to pneumatic conveying.     

循环流化床粉煤灰可控制备高纯F型八面沸石研究

利用粉煤灰制备沸石分子筛是其高值化利用的重要方向之一.以循环流化床粉煤灰为原料,采用酸浸预处理-氢氧化钠碱熔活化-水热晶化法制备F型八面沸石,并用于吸附亚甲基蓝.考察酸浸温度、碱熔温度及碱灰质量比对粉煤灰结构的影响及碱熔温度、碱灰质量比、液固比及晶化时间对沸石的结构和形貌的影响.通过XRD和SEM对粉煤灰沸石的晶体结构和形貌进行表征.结果表明,利用循环流化床粉煤灰制备高纯F型八面沸石适宜条件为碱熔温度550℃,碱灰质量比1.5:1,液固比12 mL/g,晶体导向剂用量10;,晶化温度100℃,晶化时间20 h.其比表面积高达357 m2/g,且对亚甲基蓝的饱和吸附量高达178 mg/g.     

液固流化床内床层动态特性的CFD模拟

在对液固流化床内流动特性进行理论分析的基础上,采用多相流CFD方法模拟了二维矩形流化床内水和玻璃球体系的流体动力学特性。实验结果表明,流体速度突变后,液固流化床从一个平衡状态向另一个平衡状态过渡。当液体速度减小时,床层表面及分隔界面的变化与理论模型预测一致;由于重力不稳定性的影响,当液体速度增大时,床层表面稳定上升但与时间不呈线性关系,且分隔界面难以分辨。进而膨胀后停留时间的长短对收缩过程的影响也可以忽略。尽管床层收缩时间明显小于实际膨胀时间,但是与预报的理想膨胀时间比较接近。模拟结果与前人的实验研究和理论分析相吻合,表明多相流CFD模拟可以很好地预测液固流化床的床层动态行为。     

润滑油对水平管外R134a池沸腾换热的影响

本文对不同含油量下三根水平蒸发管外R134a的池沸腾换热性能进行了试验研究.实验表明润滑油对蒸发表面的换热性能的影响因管型和含油量而异.     

加热铂丝上运动汽泡产生的射流

目前很多水的核态沸腾都观察到了汽泡顶部射流的现象。本文分析了沿细丝运动的汽泡顶部产生射流的物理机理,并通过对汽泡和加热细丝周围温度场和速度场的数值求解来进行分析。结果显示:由汽泡前后表面的温度梯度引起的热射流很可能是流动的最主要原因。热射流能够推动汽泡前进。对比和试验的观测指出,不凝气体或者其他可能的机理将限制汽泡界面处的凝结换热,从而增大表面温度梯度,增强热射流。     

多孔物质气固反应动力学研究

利用自主研制的微型流化床反应分析仪（MFBRA）在等温条件下测试了高比表面活性炭氧化反应,并根据基于固体转化的热分析动力学方法及考虑气体在微孔内扩散与反应的应用化工动力学方法求算了动力学参数．在内外扩散抑制最小化的实验条件下,粒径小于5μm的活性炭在700-1000℃的燃烧反应动力学研究表明,根据微型流化床中实验数据,采用等温热分析动力学方法求算得内扩散控制区活化能约为95kJ／mol;弓l入化工动力学方法中的随机孔模型对低温区等温燃烧数据拟合,可得孔结构参数在0．17m^-3左右,反应活化能为178kJ／mol,约为内扩散反应活化能的两倍,最为接近本征的碳燃烧反应活化能．     

Complementarity of CFD, experimentation and reactor models for solving challenging fluidization problems

Experimentalists, numerical modellers and reactor modellers need to work together, not only just for validation of numerical codes, but also to shed fundamental light on each other＇s problems and underlying assumptions. Several examples are given, Experimental gas axial dispersion data provide a means of choosing the most appropriate boundary condition （no slip, partial slip or full slip） for particles at the wall of fluidized beds. CFD simulations help to identify how close ＂two-dimensional＂ experimental columns are to being truly two-dimensional and to representing three-dimensional columns. CFD also can be used to provide a more rational means of establishing assumptions needed in the modelling of two-phase fluidized bed reactors, for example how to deal with cases where there is a change in molar flow （and hence volumetric flow） as a result of chemical reactions.     

Circulating turbulent fluidization—A new fluidization regime or just a transitional phenomenon

While circulating fluidized bed （CFB） reactor has many advantages over the more conventional turbulent fluidized bed （TFB） reactor, it does at least have one significant shortcoming-the rather dilute solids volume concentration in CFB reactor gives rise to less ideal reaction intensity. On the other hand, while having higher reaction intensity, TFB reactor has one fatal drawback of particle back-mixing, making it not suitable for certain reactions such as catalytic reaction where the catalyst requires frequent regeneration. This paper describes some key issues in the development of a circulating turbulent fluidized bed （CTFB） reactor that combines the advantages of both TFB and CFB, that is, to have the high reaction intensity as in TFB but and also to have a suppressed solids back-mixing as in CFB due to a continuous net upflow of solids flux through the bed. Experimental results show enough evidence to suggest that a new fluidization regime is formed, the characteristics of which appears to be distinct from those observed in a regular TFB and from those in either the bottom or the upper sections of regular CFB and/or high-density CFB （HDCFB）. Fundamentally, the difference is that particle-particle interaction （collision） dominates the motion of particles in CTFB and TFB, while gas-particle interaction （drag force） is the key element that determines the two phase flow in CFB including HDCFB.     

关于固定容器中水沸腾的分析——固定容器中的水在温度高于沸点时发生沸腾的原因与不发生沸腾的物理条件

从对应态方程出发定性分析在固定体积和升高温度时水沸腾的原因,也探讨了固定体积和温度达到沸点时水不发生沸腾的物理条件.     

微型电阻加热推进器内的传热问题

分析了微型电阻加热推进器中沸腾的特征以及过热极限温度,分别采用经典的抛物型热传导方程和非傅立叶导热的双曲型模型(C-V模型)、双元相滞后模型(DPL模型)来描述导热过程,采用有限差分法对微型电阻加热推进器中导热过程的初始阶段进行了数值求解.发现非傅立叶模型较傅立叶模型有-定的时间延迟,DPL模型与C-V模型的延迟差别不太大;在加热过程中,加热电阻及其临近的水很快会升至300℃,而大部分水的温度升得较慢.