Polymerization of supramonomers: A new way for fabricating supramolecular polymers and materials

Supramolecular polymers and materials are attracting more and more attention nowadays due to their dynamic properties such as reversibility, stimuli-responsiveness and self-healing. Conventionally, bifunctional or multi-functional monomers are first covalently synthesized, followed by the supramolecular complexation to form supramolecular polymers and materials. Recently, we have proposed the supramonomer concept to construct supramolecular polymers and materials in a different way. Supramonomers are bifunctional or multi-functional monomers fabricated by noncovalent synthesis, but can undergo traditional covalent polymerization. In this highlight article, we will summarize and discuss the fabrication of supramonomer and covalent polymerization methods of supramonomers; fabrication of multi-responsive supramolecular polymers from supramonomers; and fabrication of supramolecular materials from supramonomers. It is highly anticipated that the supramonomer concept will enrich the methodology towards supramolecular polymers and materials. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 2017 , 55, 604–609     

Functionalized Organotellurium Halides: Synthesis,Characterization, and Observation of Intra- and Intermolecular Secondary Bonding

Abstract

Activated tellurium, but not selenium, reacts with para-substituted benzoylmethyl bromides as well as with iodoacetamide at their melting points in absence of a solvent to give bis(p-substituted benzoylmethyl)tellurium dibromides, (p-YC₆H₄COCH₂)₂TeBr₂, (Y = H, Me, and MeO) and bis(acetamido)tellurium diiodide, (H₂NCOCH₂)₂TeI₂, respectively. Quick reduction of (p-YC₆H₄COCH₂)₂TeBr₂, with sodium metabisulphite in a two-phase system yields crystalline (p-YC₆H₄COCH₂)₂Te. These tellurides undergo smooth oxidative addition of halogens, interhalogen ICl or a pseudohalogen (SCN)₂. Intramolecular coordination of the carbonyl group in these functionalized diorganotellurium dihalides is evident from IR spectra and shorter Te···O (carbonyl) distances in comparison to the sum of van der Waals radii and completes six coordination around Te atom. Not unexpectedly, therefore, intermolecular secondary bonding effects of the type Te…O, Te···X and X···X are missing in (PhCOCH₂)₂TeBr₂, (p-MeOC₆H₄COCH₂)TeBr₂ and (PhCOCH₂)₂TeI₂. Instead, these compounds provide rare examples, among organotellurium compounds, of supramolecular architecture, where C–H···Br and C–H···O hydrogen bonds and π-π (phenyl ring) interactions appear to be the noncovalent intermolecular associative forces that dominate the crystal packing.     

ORGANOSTANNOXANE MOTIFS IN CAGES AND SUPRAMOLECULAR ARCHITECTURES

The reactions of n-butyl stannonic acid with(PhO) ₂ P(O)H leads to the formation of a hexameric tin cage [{(n-BuSn) ₃ (PhO) ₃ O} ₂ {HPO ₃ } ₄ ].This reaction involves an in situ P─O bond cleavage and the generation of a [HPO ₃ ] ^2? ion. A direct reaction of six equivalents of n-BuSnO(OH) acid with six equivalents of C ₆ H ₅ OH and four equivalents of H ₃ PO ₃ also leads to the formation of same cage structure. A tetranuclear organooxotin cage[(PhCH ₂ ) ₂ Sn ₂ O(O ₂ P(OH)-t-Bu) ₄ ] ₂ has been assembled by debenzylation involving the reaction of (PhCH ₂ ) ₂ SnCl ₂ ,(PhCH ₂ ) ₂ SnO·H ₂ O or (PhCH ₂ ) ₃ SnCl with two equivalents of t-BuP(O)OH ₂ . A half-cage intermediate [(PhCH ₂ ) ₂ Sn ₂ O(O ₂ P(OH)-t-Bu) ₄ ] has been detected. New organotin cations of the type [n-Bu ₂ Sn(H ₂ O) ₄ ] ²⁺[2,5-Me ₂ -C ₆ H ₃ SO ₃ ]^? ₂ and {[n-Bu ₂ Sn(H ₂ O) ₃ LSn(H ₂ O) ₃ (n-Bu) ₂ ] ²⁺[1,5-(SO ₃ ) ₂ -C ₁₀ H ₆ ] ^2?} have been obtained in the reactions of n-Bu ₂ SnO or (n-Bu ₃ Sn) ₃ O with 2,5-dimethyl sulfonic acid and 1,5-naphthalene disulfonic acid respectively. These organotin cations form interesting supramolecular structures in the solid state as a result of O─H─···O hydrogen bonding.     

Injectable Graphene Oxide/Graphene Composite Supramolecular Hydrogel for Delivery of Anti-Cancer Drugs

Injectable hydrogels have attracted a lot of attention in drug delivery, however, their capacity to deliver water-insoluble or hydrophobic anti-cancer drugs is limited. Here, we developed injectable graphene oxide/graphene composite supramolecular hydrogels to deliver anti-cancer drugs. Pluronic F-127 was used to stabilize graphene oxide (GO) and reduced graphene oxide (RGO) in solution, which was mixed with α-cyclodextrin (α-CD) solution to form hydrogels. Native hydrogel was used as control. GO or RGO slightly shortened gelation time. The storage and loss moduli of the hydrogels were tracked by dynamic force measurement. The storage modulus of GO or RGO composite hydrogels was larger than that of the native hydrogel. Hydrogels were unstable in solution and eroded gradually. GO or RGO in Pluronic F-127 solution could potentially improve the solubility of the water-insoluble anti-cancer drug camptothecin (CPT), especially with large drug-loaded CPT amount. Drug release behaviors from solutions and hydrogels were characterized. The nanocomponents (GO or RGO) were able to bind more drug molecules either for CPT or for doxorubicin hydrochloride (DXR) in solution. Therefore, GO or RGO composite hydrogel could potentially enable better controlled and gentler drug release (for both CPT and DXR) than native hydrogel.     

Preparation of PEO-b-PPO-b-PEO/α-cyclodextrin supramolecular hydrogels hybridized with exfoliated graphite nanoplates

Abstract

In this work, an effective method was developed to prepare novel PEO-b-PPO-b-PEO (EPE)/α-cyclodextrin (α-CD) supramolecular hydrogels containing exfoliated graphite nanoplates (xGNPs) by mixing an aqueous solution of α-CD with an aqueous dispersion of xGNPs at the presence of amphiphilic EPE copolymer. The EPE copolymer played three important roles in the preparation process: (1) as an exfoliating agent to break expanded graphites into xGNPs under ultrasonication, (2) as a dispersant to stabilize xGNPs in the aqueous solution, and （3）as a component to form the inclusion complexes with α-CD. The resultant xGNPs/EPE/α-CD hybridized hydrogels were characterized by scanning electron microscopy, wide-angle X-ray diffraction, differential scanning calorimetry, and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, which confirmed not only the formation of supramolecular hydrogel structure but also the homogenous dispersion of xGNPs in the hydrogel matrix. It was found that the existence of xGNPs can accelerate the speed of gel formation in comparison with that of the native EPE/α-CD hydrogel. Additionally, the water-retention ability and the release behavior of vancomycin hydrochloride for the xGNPs/EPE/α-CD hybridized hydrogels were investigated.     

A Complex between C-Methylcalix[4]resorcinarene and Triethylammonium Nitrate

Abstract

The synthesis and crystal structure of the complex formed by the all-cis epimer of C-methylcalix[4]resorcinarene (1) and triethylammonium nitrate are reported. “1.(HNEt⁺ ₃)₄. (NO^? ₃)₄(2)”, crystallizes in the monoclinic space group P2₁/n, a=25.796(2), b=16.6048(11), c=29.5659(10) Å, β=94.636(4)°, V=12623(2) ų, Z=8. Refinement led to a final conventional R₁ value of 0.128 for 12428 reflections and 1473 parameters. The resorcinarene displays the usual bowl-type shape, with four hydroxyl protons involved in intramolecular hydrogen bonds, whereas the remaining four make hydrogen bonds with four bridging nitrate ions, which results in the formation of infinite chains. Those chains are arranged so as to form layers, between which the triethylammonium ions and the remaining nitrate ions are hydrogen-bonded one to another.     

Electrically insulated molecular wires

This paper is an up-to-date mini-review based on literature data and own results regarding synthesis and properties of conducting (pseudo)rotaxane supramolecular structures. Conjugated polymers, such as polyarylene, polyheteroarylene, polyaniline, polyarylenevinylene or polyaryleneimine, were used as axle, while the macrocyclic components were cyclodextrins, cucurbiturils, cyclophanes or crown ethers. Properties of the supramolecular structure such as solubility, thermal or chemical stability, conductivity, etc. can be drastically modified by the inclusion of hydrophobic conjugated polymers inside the macrocycle, without any chemical modification. For instance, the photophysical properties (i.e. quantum yield of fluorescence and electroluminescence) of the supramolecular structures were enhanced when compared with uninsulated conjugated polymers. The doping process is also affected, because the access of a dopant to the conjugated chain is limited only to the uncovered domains of the conjugated chain.     

Multi-responsive cyclodextrin vesicles assembled by ‘supramolecular bola-amphiphiles’

Multi-responsive cyclodextrin vesicles (CDVs) self-assembled by ‘supramolecular bola-amphiphiles’, consisting of a guest (N,N′-bis(ferrocenylmethylene)-diaminohexane, 1) and a host (γ-hydroxybutyric-β-cyclodextrin, γ-HB-β-CD), were prepared and investigated for the first time. The morphologies and sizes of these novel vesicles in water were observed by transmission electron microscopy (TEM), scanning electron microscopy and dynamic light scattering. The effects of the host–guest ratio, the concentration and the solvent composition are also discussed. The host–guest interactions, complex stoichiometry and structures of 1·γ-HB-β-CD in water were investigated by cyclic voltammetry, UV and NMR spectroscopy. According to the complex stoichiometry, TEM observations and Chem3D estimation, the ‘supramolecular bola-amphiphiles’, made from 1·γ-HB-β-CD and assumed for the first time, formed the membranes of the CDVs. The CDV system was responsive to an oxidising agent, which is the first report on redox-responsive systems in this field. The CDVs are also responsive to pH and the presence of metal ions, such that they disassemble upon addition of acetic acid or Cu²⁺ ions, providing possible routes to drug delivery systems.     

Ethylene spacer-linked bis-acetamidopyridine for dicarboxylic acid recognition and polymeric new wave-like anti-perpendicular arrangement of a host–guest in the solid state

In this paper, 1,2-bis(2-acetamido-6-pyridyl)ethane, receptor 1, having an ethylene spacer is reported to recognise dicarboxylic acids. The binding study in the solution phase is carried out using ¹H NMR (1:1) and UV–vis experiments and in the solid phase by single-crystal X-ray analysis. In ¹H NMR, the downfield shifts of specific amide protons of receptor 1 in 1:1 complexes of receptor and guest diacids, and in the UV–vis experiment, the appearance of an isosbestic point as well as significant binding constants are observed, which thus unambiguously support the complexation of receptor 1 with dicarboxylic acids in solution. Receptor 2, simple 2-acetamido-6-methylpyridine, has lower binding constants than receptor 1 due to cooperative binding of two pyridine amide groups with two acid groups of diacids. In the solid phase, the ditopic receptor 1 shows a grid-like polymeric hydrogen-bonded network that changes to a polymeric wave-like 1:1 anti-perpendicular network instead of the syn–syn polymeric 1:1 (Goswami, S.; Dey, S.; Fun, H.-K.; Anjum, S.; Rahman, A.-U. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005 (a) Goswami, S., Ghosh, K. and Dasgupta, S. 2000. J. Org. Chem., 65: 1907–1914. (b) Goswami, S.; Ghosh, K.; Mukherjee, R. Tetrahedron2001, 57, 4987–4993. (c) Goswami, S.; Ghosh, K.; Halder, M. Tetrahedron Lett.1999, 40, 1735–1738. (d) Goswami, S.; Dey, S.; Fun, H.-K.; Anjum, S.; Rahman, A.-U. Tetrahedron Lett.2005, 46, 7187–7191. (e) Goswami, S.; Jana, S.; Dey, S.; Razak, I.A.; Fun, H.-K. Supramol. Chem.2006, 18, 571–574. (f) Goswami, S.; Jana, S.; Fun, H.-K. Cryst. Eng. Comm.2008, 10, 507–517. (g) Goswami, S.; Jana, S.; Dey, S.; Sen, D.; Fun, H.-K.; Chantrapromma, S. Tetrahedron2008,64, 6426–6433. (h) Goswami, S.; Dey, S.; Jana, S. Tetrahedron2008, 64, 6358–6363 [Google Scholar], 46, 7187–7191), anti–anti polymeric 1:1 (Goswami, S.; Jana, S.; Dey, S.; Razak, I.A.; Fun, H.-K. Supramol. Chem. 2006 (a) Goswami, S., Ghosh, K. and Dasgupta, S. 2000. J. Org. Chem., 65: 1907–1914. (b) Goswami, S.; Ghosh, K.; Mukherjee, R. Tetrahedron2001, 57, 4987–4993. (c) Goswami, S.; Ghosh, K.; Halder, M. Tetrahedron Lett.1999, 40, 1735–1738. (d) Goswami, S.; Dey, S.; Fun, H.-K.; Anjum, S.; Rahman, A.-U. Tetrahedron Lett.2005, 46, 7187–7191. (e) Goswami, S.; Jana, S.; Dey, S.; Razak, I.A.; Fun, H.-K. Supramol. Chem.2006, 18, 571–574. (f) Goswami, S.; Jana, S.; Fun, H.-K. Cryst. Eng. Comm.2008, 10, 507–517. (g) Goswami, S.; Jana, S.; Dey, S.; Sen, D.; Fun, H.-K.; Chantrapromma, S. Tetrahedron2008,64, 6426–6433. (h) Goswami, S.; Dey, S.; Jana, S. Tetrahedron2008, 64, 6358–6363 [Google Scholar], 18, 571–574; Goswami, S.; Jana, S.; Fun, H.-K. Cryst. Eng. Comm. 2008, 10, 507–517; Goswami, S.; Jana, S.; Dey, S.; Sen, D.; Fun, H.-K.; Chantrapromma, S. Tetrahedron 2008, 64, 6426–6433), syn–syn 2:2 (Karle, I.L.; Ranganathan, D.; Haridas, V. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997 (a) Garcia-Tellado, F., Goswami, S., Chang, S.K., Geib, S.J. and Hamilton, A.D. 1990. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 112: 7393–7394. (b) Geib, S.J.; Vicent, C.; Fan, E.; Hamilton, A.D. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl.1993, 32, 119–121. (c) Garcia-Tellado, F.; Geib, S.J.; Goswami, S.; Hamilton, A.D. J. Am. Chem. Soc.1991, 113, 9265–9269. (d) Karle, I.L.; Ranganathan, D.; Haridas, V. J. Am. Chem. Soc.1997, 119, 2777–2783. (e) Moore, G.; Papamicaël, C.; Levacher, V.; Bourguignon, J.; Dupas, G. Tetrahedron2004, 60, 4197–4204. (f) Korendovych, I.V.; Cho, M.; Makhlynets, O.V.; Butler, P.L.; Staples, R.J.; Rybak-Akimova, E.V. J. Org. Chem.2008, 73, 4771–4782. (g) Ghosh, K.; Masanta, G.; Fröhlich, R.; Petsalakis, I.D.; Theodorakopoulos, G. J. Phys. Chem. B2009, 113, 7800–7809 [Google Scholar], 119, 2777–2783) or top–bottom-bound 1:1 (Garcia-Tellado, F.; Goswami, S.; Chang, S.K.; Geib, S.J.; Hamilton, A.D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990 (a) Goswami, S., Ghosh, K. and Dasgupta, S. 2000. J. Org. Chem., 65: 1907–1914. (b) Goswami, S.; Ghosh, K.; Mukherjee, R. Tetrahedron2001, 57, 4987–4993. (c) Goswami, S.; Ghosh, K.; Halder, M. Tetrahedron Lett.1999, 40, 1735–1738. (d) Goswami, S.; Dey, S.; Fun, H.-K.; Anjum, S.; Rahman, A.-U. Tetrahedron Lett.2005, 46, 7187–7191. (e) Goswami, S.; Jana, S.; Dey, S.; Razak, I.A.; Fun, H.-K. Supramol. Chem.2006, 18, 571–574. (f) Goswami, S.; Jana, S.; Fun, H.-K. Cryst. Eng. Comm.2008, 10, 507–517. (g) Goswami, S.; Jana, S.; Dey, S.; Sen, D.; Fun, H.-K.; Chantrapromma, S. Tetrahedron2008,64, 6426–6433. (h) Goswami, S.; Dey, S.; Jana, S. Tetrahedron2008, 64, 6358–6363 [Google Scholar], 112, 7393–7394) co-crystals.