排序方式: 共有266条查询结果,搜索用时 312 毫秒
1.
2.
3.
Georgia W. Hodges Deborah Tippins J. Steve Oliver 《School science and mathematics》2013,113(6):263-274
Science teacher retention, attrition, and migration continue to perplex educational scholars, political entities, as well as the general public. This study utilized an interpretive methodological design to generate assertions regarding career choice made by highly qualified science teachers in the deep, rural South through analysis of documents, interviews, focus groups, and observation. Generally considered “difficult to staff” because of location, socioeconomics, and demographics, Wilson County High School is an exemplar in science teacher retention and student achievement. Findings presented include how the science department at Wilson County improved student learning outcomes as well as the reasons why two of the highly qualified science teachers at this school were considering leaving the profession they love. 相似文献
4.
美国《科学教师培养标准(2020年版)》针对《新一代科学教育标准》的推行而修订,立足于科学教育最新研究成果,尤其突出学科内容知识的重要性,补充对科学本质和科学文化的要求,强化对工程和技术、交叉概念、学科观念的理解,突出学习进阶规律在科学教师培养中的应用。此外,在学科教学法、学习环境、安全、对学生学习的影响等维度做出相应的改动。该标准启示我国:借鉴国际改革趋势出台中国特色的科学教师培养标准,但科学教师培养也要本土化;学科内容知识对科学教师专业发展非常重要;科学教师的培养应立足于学习进阶的规律;职前科学教师培养需要注重学习环境建设。 相似文献
5.
采用定量的方法对112位化学师范生和83位中学化学教师进行问卷调查,了解职前、在职教师对教学能力要素重要性认识的情况,问卷涉及本体要素、工具要素、条件要素、实践要素、情意要素和发展要素等6大维度。基于Rasch测量模型,利用ConQuest,Winstep,SPSS22.0软件对数据进行统计分析。研究发现:(1)问卷具有良好的信效度;(2)师范生、在职教师均把情意要素作为教学能力的首要成分,其次依次是本体要素、发展要素、实践要素,工具要素与条件要素排在其他要素之后;(3)工具要素重要性赞同度师范生显著高于在职教师,其余维度差异不显著,不同性别各维度重要性赞同度也无显著性差异;(4)由ConQuest多维分析所建立的项目被试图可以直观展示不同维度上各教学能力的重要程度。 相似文献
6.
7.
利用实验室一般仪器,对洋葱中挥发性化学成分如含硫化合物、醇类、醛类、羧酸进行了定性检测,旨在让高师生体验探究学习,掌握探究方法,发展实验设计和探究能力。 相似文献
8.
9.
10.
In a research project with one-day teacher education workshops for secondary-school mathematics teachers, our study explores the potential of tool-supported discussions in helping them to notice important and critical aspects of mathematics teaching talk. Mathematical practices of naming and explaining in teaching talk, students’ content learning challenges, and noticing processes of identifying, interpreting and deciding are the components of our framework and the tools that guided the design and implementation of three workshops on linear equations, fractions and plane isometries. The data was collected during the discussions with the seven teachers and the teacher educator throughout these workshops. The coding of the discussions allowed us to see discourse moves that reveal the teachers’ noticing of: (i) challenges in the identification of mathematical naming, (ii) mathematical explaining that voices the students’ learning, (iii) classroom practice in relation to mathematical naming and explaining. 相似文献