原子吸收光谱法测定有机锗（Ge─132）中的锗及其杂质

火焰原子吸收法测定有机锗（Ｇｅ．１３２）①中的锗，线性浓度范围为０－１．２５ｍｇ／ｍＬ，方法精度为１．２％，相对标准偏差＜２％，平均回收率为９９．５％。杂质Ｐｂ和Ａｓ用塞曼石墨炉原子吸收测定，Ｐｂ用（ＮＨ_４）_２ＨＰＯ_４＋Ｍｇ作改进剂，Ａｓ用Ｐｄ作改进剂，特征质量分别为８．２ｐｇ和８ｐｇ，相对标准偏差分别为２．１％和２．２％，并讨论了有关机理问题。     

盐酸普鲁卡因的ICP-AES测定

在pH5．0溶液中，过量的四苯硼钠可完全沉淀盐酸普鲁卡因(季铵盐)，用等离子发射光谱法测定滤液中的四苯硼钠，即可计算盐酸普鲁卡因的含量，间接测定盐酸普鲁卡因，该方法回收率为96％一101％，相对标准偏差为2．5％，且简单快速。     

原子荧光光谱法测定制干辣椒中的微量元素硒

应用原子荧光光谱法测定制干辣椒中微量元素硒,精密度与准确度良好,加标回收率在92%-106％之间,相对标准偏差为4．0％。方法简便、快速、可靠、结果令人满意。     

Recent studies on advance spectroscopic techniques for the identification of microorganisms: A review

The continuous development of resistance to antibiotic drugs by microorganisms causes high mortality and morbidity. Pathogens with distinct features and biochemical abilities make them destructive to human health. Therefore, early identification of the pathogen is of substantial importance for quick ailments and healthcare outcomes. Several phenotype methods are used for the identification and resistance determination but most of the conventional procedures are time-consuming, costly, and give qualitative results. Recently, great focus has been made on the utilization of advanced techniques for microbial identification. This review is focused on the research studies performed in the last five years for the identification of microorganisms particularly, bacteria using advanced spectroscopic techniques including mass spectrometry (MS), infrared (IR) spectroscopy, Raman spectroscopy (RS), and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. Among all the techniques, MS techniques, particularly MALDI-TOF/MS have been widely utilized for microbial identification. A total of 44 bacteria i.e., 6 Staphylococcus spp., 3 Enterococcus spp., 6 Bacillus spp., 4 Streptococcus spp., 6 Salmonella spp., and one from each genus including Escherichia, Acinetobacter, Pseudomonas, Proteus, Clostridioides, Candida, Brucella, Burkholderia, Francisella, Yersinia, Moraxella, Vibrio, Shigella, Serratia, Citrobacter, and Haemophilus (spp.) were discussed in the review for their identification using the above-mentioned techniques. Among all the identified microorganisms, 21% of studies have been conducted for the identification of E. coli, 14% for S. aureus followed by 37% for other microorganisms.