Selective synthetic routes to sterically hindered unsymmetrical diaryl ketones via arylstannanes

Bulky arylstannanes and bulky aroyl chlorides are good reaction partners for the synthesis of two-, three-, and even four-ortho-substituted benzophenones, in good to excellent isolated yields (47-91%). Three simple and direct routes, with differential advantages, are proposed: (i) a catalyst-free protocol, in o-dichlorobenzene (ODCB) at 180 °C; (ii) a room temperature protocol, using AlCl(3) (0.5 equiv), in dichloromethane (DCM); and (iii) a solvent-free, indium-promoted procedure. A radical mechanism is proposed for the indium-mediated reactions.     

How the stereochemistry of a central cyclopentyl ring influences the self-assembling properties of archaeal lipid analogues: synthesis and cryoTEM observations

The relative stereochemistry (cis or trans) of a 1,3-disubstituted cyclopentane unit placed in the middle of tetraether archaeal bipolar lipid analogues was found to have a dramatic influence on their supramolecular self-assembling properties. The synthesis of two diastereomers varying only by the stereochemistry of the cyclopentyl unit was achieved following a multistep diastereoselective route. The corresponding lipid films were hydrated and were observed by cryoTEM. The micrographs showed several types of unilamellar nano-objects such as lamellas or irregular vesicles for the cis-isomer, whereas the trans-isomer exhibited exclusively multilamellar vesicles with a regular spherical shape. Even if the cyclopentyl ring takes part of a long alkyl chain (32 carbon atoms), the pseudorotation of the carbocycle would influence the global conformation of the bipolar lipid and consequently would modify the orientation of the lactosyl polar headgroups.     

Hofmeister effects: interplay of hydration, nonelectrostatic potentials, and ion size

The classical Derjaguin-Landau-Verwey-Overbeek (DLVO) theory of colloids, and corresponding theories of electrolytes, are unable to explain ion specific forces between colloidal particles quantitatively. The same is true generally, for surfactant aggregates, lipids, proteins, for zeta and membrane potentials and in adsorption phenomena. Even with fitting parameters the theory is not predictive. The classical theories of interactions begin with continuum solvent electrostatic (double layer) forces. Extensions to include surface hydration are taken care of with concepts like inner and outer Helmholtz planes, and "dressed" ion sizes. The opposing quantum mechanical attractive forces (variously termed van der Waals, Hamaker, Lifshitz, dispersion, nonelectrostatic forces) are treated separately from electrostatic forces. The ansatz that separates electrostatic and quantum forces can be shown to be thermodynamically inconsistent. Hofmeister or specific ion effects usually show up above ≈10(-2) molar salt. Parameters to accommodate these in terms of hydration and ion size had to be invoked, specific to each case. Ionic dispersion forces, between ions and solvent, for ion-ion and ion-surface interactions are not explicit in classical theories that use "effective" potentials. It can be shown that the missing ionic quantum fluctuation forces have a large role to play in specific ion effects, and in hydration. In a consistent predictive theory they have to be included at the same level as the nonlinear electrostatic forces that form the skeletal framework of standard theory. This poses a challenge. The challenges go further than academic theory and have implications for the interpretation and meaning of concepts like pH, buffers and membrane potentials, and for their experimental interpretation. In this article we overview recent quantitative developments in our evolving understanding of the theoretical origins of specific ion, or Hofmeister effects. These are demonstrated through an analysis that incorporates nonelectrostatic ion-surface and ion-ion dispersion interactions. This is based on ab initio ionic polarisabilities, and finite ion sizes quantified through recent ab initio work. We underline the central role of ionic polarisabilities and of ion size in the nonelectrostatic interactions that involve ions, solvent molecules and interfaces. Examples of mechanisms through which they operate are discussed in detail. An ab initio hydration model that accounts for polarisabilities of the tightly held hydration shell of "cosmotropic" ions is introduced. It is shown how Hofmeister effects depend on an interplay between specific surface chemistry, surface charge density, pH, buffer, and counterion with polarisabilities and ion size. We also discuss how the most recent theories on surface hydration combined with hydrated nonelectrostatic potentials may predict experimental zeta potentials and hydration forces.     

1,3-Diphenylbenzo[e][1,2,4]triazin-7(1H)-one: selected chemistry at the C-6, C-7 and C-8 positions

1,3-Diphenylbenzo[e][1,2,4]triazin-7(1H)-one (6) reacts with tetracyanoethylene (TCNE) or tetracyanoethylene oxide (TCNEO) to give the deep green 2-[1,3-diphenylbenzo[e][1,2,4]triazin-7(1H)-ylidene]propanedinitrile (11) in 17 and 15% yields, respectively. Nucleophiles such as amines, alkoxides, thiols and Grignard reagents all reacted with the 1,3-diphenylbenzotriazinone 6 regioselectively at C-6, while halogenating agents reacted exclusively at C-8. Furthermore, 8-iodo-1,3-diphenylbenzo[e][1,2,4]triazin-7(1H)-one (32) undergoes palladium-catalysed Suzuki-Miyaura and Stille coupling reactions to give 8-aryl- or heteroaryl-substituted benzotriazinones. By combining both the C-6 and C-8 chemistries 1,3,6,8-tetraphenylbenzo[e][1,2,4]triazin-7(1H)-one (42) and 1,3-diphenyl-6,8-di(thien-2-yl)-benzo[e][1,2,4]triazin-7(1H)-one (43) can be prepared. All new compounds are fully characterized.     

Proton-induced reactivities of ruthenium azido complexes: the first example of boron-carbon bond formation by methylene insertion into a B-H bond

Whereas the reaction of Tp(PhCN)(PPh(3))Ru-N(3) {Tp = HB(pz)(3), pz = pyrazolyl} with CH(3)I in CH(2)Cl(2) led to the cationic ruthenium methyleneimine complex [Tp(PPh(3))(PhCN)Ru(NH=CH(2))]I, the analogous reaction with HCl gave rise to the ruthenium chloride complex containing a methyl tris(pyrazolyl)borate ligand (Me)Tp(PPh(3))(PhCN)RuCl, as a result of the highly unusual methylene insertion into a B-H bond of the Tp ligand.     

Experimental and theoretical investigation of the kinetics of the reaction of atomic chlorine with 1,4-dioxane

The rate coefficients for the reaction of 1,4-dioxane with atomic chlorine were measured from T = 292-360 K using the relative rate method. The reference reactant was isobutane and the experiments were made in argon with atomic chlorine produced by photolysis of small concentrations of Cl2. The rate coefficients were put on an absolute basis by using the published temperature dependence of the absolute rate coefficients for the reference reaction. The rate coefficients for the reaction of Cl with 1,4-dioxane were found to be independent of total pressure from p = 290 to 782 Torr. The experimentally measured rate coefficients showed a weak temperature dependence, given by k(exp)(T) = (8.4(-2.3)(+3.1)) × 10(-10) exp(-(470 ± 110)/(T/K)) cm3 molecule (-1) s(-1). The experimental results are rationalized in terms of statistical rate theory on the basis of molecular data obtained from quantum-chemical calculations. Molecular geometries and frequencies were obtained from MP2/aug-cc-pVDZ calculations, while single-point energies of the stationary points were computed at CCSD(T) level of theory. The calculations indicate that the reaction proceeds by an overall exothermic addition-elimination mechanism via two intermediates, where the rate-determining step is the initial barrier-less association reaction between the chlorine atom and the chair conformer of 1,4-dioxane. This is in contrast to the Br plus 1,4-dioxane reaction studied earlier, where the rate-determining step is a chair-to-boat conformational change of the bromine-dioxane adduct, which is necessary for this reaction to proceed. The remarkable difference in the kinetic behavior of the reactions of 1,4-dioxane with these two halogen atoms can be consistently explained by this change in the reaction mechanism.