排序方式： 共有33条查询结果，搜索用时 15 毫秒
11.
12.
Aspects of yield and specific activity of (n,γ) produced 177Lu used in targeted radionuclide therapy
K. V. Vimalnath Priyalata Shetty Sharad P. Lohar V. C. Adya S. K. Thulasidas Sudipta Chakraborty Ashutosh Dash 《Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry》2014,302(2):809-812
177Lu-labeled receptor avid peptides and monoclonal antibodies have been effectively used in targeted tumor therapy, owing to the ideally suited decay properties and favourable production logistics of 177Lu [T½ = 6.65 days; Eβ(max) = 497 keV (78.6 %); Eγ = 208 keV (11.0 %)]. The specific activity of 177Lu produced by the (n,γ) route is one of the important criteria, which determines the efficacy of 177Lu-labeled receptor-avid biomolecules. The present article highlights that the specific activity of (n,γ) produced 177Lu cannot be calculated by simply dividing the produced activity by the mass of the target irradiated, unlike other (n,γ) produced medical radioisotopes and there is a significant enhancement of specific activity due to the burn up of the Lu target during irradiation, which is an added advantage towards the utilization of 177Lu in receptor specific therapeutic radiopharmaceuticals. 相似文献
13.
Artuso M He D Goldberg M Horwitz N Kennett R Moneti GC Muheim F Mukhin Y Playfer S Rozen Y Stone S Thulasidas M Vasseur G Zhu G Bartelt J Csorna SE Egyed Z Jain V Sheldon P Akerib DS Barish B Chadha M Chan S Cowen DF Eigen G Miller JS O'Grady C Urheim J Weinstein AJ Acosta D Athanas M Masek G Paar H Sivertz M Bean A Gronberg J Kutschke R Menary S Morrison RJ Nakanishi S Nelson HN Nelson TK Richman JD Ryd A Tajima H Schmidt D Sperka D Witherell MS Procario M Yang S Balest R Cho K Daoudi M 《Physical review D: Particles and fields》1994,50(9):5484-5490
14.
Brown DN Fast J McIlwain RL Miao T Miller DH Modesitt M Payne D Shibata EI Shipsey IP Wang PN Battle M Ernst J Kwon Y Roberts S Thorndike EH Wang CH Dominick J Lambrecht M Sanghera S Shelkov V Skwarnicki T Stroynowski R Volobouev I Wei G Zadorozhny P Artuso M Goldberg M He D Horwitz N Kennett R Mountain R Moneti GC Muheim F Mukhin Y Playfer S Rozen Y Stone S Thulasidas M Vasseur G Zhu G Bartelt J Csorna SE Egyed Z Jain V Kinoshita K Edwards KW Ogg M Britton DI Hyatt ER MacFarlane DB Patel PM 《Physical review D: Particles and fields》1994,50(3):1884-1891
15.
Avery P Besson D Garren L Yelton J Kinoshita K Pipkin FM Procario M Wilson R Wolinski J Xiao D Zhu Y Ammar R Baringer P Coppage D Davis R Haas P Kelly M Kwak N Lam H Ro S Kubota Y Nelson JK Perticone D Poling R Fulton R Jensen T Johnson DR Kagan H Kass R Morrow F Whitmore J Wilson P Bortoletto D Chen W Dominick J McIlwain RL Miller DH Ng CR Schaffner SF Shibata EI Shipsey IP Yao W Battle M Sparks K Thorndike EH Wang C Alam MS Kim IJ Li WC Romero V Sun CR Wang P Zoeller MM Goldberg M Haupt T 《Physical review letters》1990,65(23):2842-2845
16.
Bortoletto D Goldberg M Horwitz N Jain V Mestayer MD Moneti GC Sharma V Shipsey IP Skwarnicki T Thulasidas M Csorna SE Letson T Alexander J Artuso M Bebek C Berkelman K Cassel DG Cheu E Coffman DM Crawford G DeWire JW Drell PS Ehrlich R Galik RS Gittelman B Gray SW Halling AM Hartill DL Heltsley BK Kandaswamy J Katayama N Kreinick DL Lewis JD Mistry NB Mueller J Namjoshi R Nandi S Nordberg E O'Grady C Peterson D Pisharody M Riley D Sapper M Silverman A Stone S Worden H Worris M Sadoff AJ 《Physical review letters》1990,64(18):2117-2120
17.
Artuso M Goldberg M Horwitz N Kennett R Moneti GC Muheim F Playfer S Rozen Y Rubin P Stone S Thulasidas M Yao W Zhu G Barnes AV Bartelt J Csorna SE Egyed Z Jain V Sheldon P Akerib DS Barish B Chadha M Cowen DF Eigen G Miller JS Urheim J Weinstein AJ Acosta D Masek G Ong B Paar H Sivertz M Bean A Gronberg J Kutschke R Menary S Morrison RJ Nelson H Richman J Tajima H Schmidt D Sperka D Witherell M Procario M Yang S Daoudi M Ford WT Johnson DR Lingel K Lohner M Rankin P Smith JG Alexander JP 《Physical review letters》1992,69(23):3278-3281
18.
19.
20.
V. C. Adya A. Sengupta B. A. Dhawale B. Rajeswari S. K. Thulasidas S. V. Godbole 《Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry》2012,291(3):843-848
Trace metallic impurity analysis by spectroscopic techniques is one of the important steps of chemical quality control of
nuclear fuel materials. Depending on the burn-up and the storage time of the fuel, there is an accumulation of 241Am in plutonium based fuel materials due to β decay of 241Pu. In this paper, attempts were made to develop a method for separation of 241Am from 1.2 kg of analytical solid waste containing 70% U, 23% Pu, 5% Ag and 1–2% C as major constituents along with other
minor constituents generated during trace metal assay of plutonium based fuel samples by d. c. arc carrier distillation atomic
emission spectrometry. A combination of ion exchange, solvent extraction and precipitation methods were carried out to separate
~45 mg of 241Am as Am(NO3)3 from 15 L of the analytical waste solution. Dowex 1×4 ion exchange chromatographic method was used for separation of Pu whereas
30% TBP–kerosene was utilized for separation of U. Am was separated from other impurities by fluoride precipitation followed
by conversion to nitrate. The recovery of Pu from ion exchange chromatographic separation step was ~93% while the cumulative
recovery of Am after separation process was found to be ~90%. 相似文献