排序方式： 共有107条查询结果，搜索用时 31 毫秒
41.
Anastassov A Duboscq JE Eckhart E Gan KK Gwon C Hart T Honscheid K Hufnagel D Kagan H Kass R Pedlar TK Schwarthoff H Thayer JB von Toerne E Zoeller MM Richichi SJ Severini H Skubic P Undrus A Chen S Fast J Hinson JW Lee J Miller DH Shibata EI Shipsey IP Pavlunin V Cronin-Hennessy D Lyon AL Thorndike EH Jessop CP Savinov V Coan TE Fadeyev V Maravin Y Narsky I Stroynowski R Ye J Wlodek T Artuso M Ayad R Boulahouache C Bukin K Dambasuren E Karamov S Majumder G Moneti GC Mountain R Schuh S 《Physical review letters》2001,86(20):4467-4471
The tau decays to six-pion final states have been studied with the CLEO detector at the Cornell Electron Storage Ring. The measured branching fractions are B(tau(-)-->2pi(-)pi(+)3pi(0)nu(tau)) = (2.2+/-0.3+/-0.4)x10(-4) and B(tau(-)-->3pi(-)2pi(+)pi(0)nu(tau)) = (1.7+/-0.2+/-0.2)x10(-4). A search for substructure in these decays shows that they are saturated by intermediate states with eta or omega mesons. We present the first observation of the decay tau(-)-->2pi(-)pi(+)omega(nu)tau and the branching fraction is measured to be (1.2+/-0.2+/-0.1)x10(-4). The measured branching fractions are in good agreement with the isospin expectations but somewhat below the conserved-vector-current predictions. 相似文献
42.
Cronin-Hennessy D Park CS Park W Thayer JB Thorndike EH Coan TE Gao YS Liu F Stroynowski R Artuso M Boulahouache C Blusk S Dambasuren E Dorjkhaidav O Mountain R Muramatsu H Nandakumar R Skwarnicki T Stone S Wang JC Mahmood AH Csorna SE Bonvicini G Cinabro D Dubrovin M Bornheim A Lipeles E Pappas SP Shapiro A Sun WM Weinstein AJ Briere RA Chen GP Ferguson T Tatishvili G Vogel H Watkins ME Adam NE Alexander JP Berkelman K Boisvert V Cassel DG Duboscq JE Ecklund KM Ehrlich R Galik RS Gibbons L 《Physical review letters》2004,92(22):222002
The CLEO Collaboration has made the first observations of hadronic transitions among bottomonium (bbmacr;) states other than the dipion transitions among Upsilon(nS) states. In our study of Upsilon(3S) decays, we find a significant signal for Upsilon(3S)-->gammaomegaUpsilon(1S) that is consistent with radiative decays Upsilon(3S)-->gammachi(b1,2)(2P), followed by chi(b1,2)(2P)-->omegaUpsilon(1S). The branching ratios we obtain are B[chi(b1)(2P)-->omegaUpsilon(1S)]=(1.63(+0.35+0.16)(-0.31-0.15))% and B[chi(b2)(2P)-->omegaUpsilon(1S)]=(1.10(+0.32+0.11)(-0.28-0.10))%, in which the first error is statistical and the second is systematic. 相似文献
43.
Pedlar TK Cronin-Hennessy D Hietala J Dobbs S Metreveli Z Seth KK Tomaradze A Xiao T Martin L Powell A Wilkinson G Mendez H Ge JY Miller DH Shipsey IP Xin B Adams GS Hu D Moziak B Napolitano J Ecklund KM Insler J Muramatsu H Park CS Pearson LJ Thorndike EH Ricciardi S Thomas C Artuso M Blusk S Mountain R Skwarnicki T Stone S Zhang LM Bonvicini G Cinabro D Lincoln A Smith MJ Zhou P Zhu J Naik P Rademacker J Asner DM Edwards KW Randrianarivony K Tatishvili G Briere RA Vogel H Onyisi PU Rosner JL 《Physical review letters》2011,107(4):041803
Using 586 pb(-1) of e+ e- collision data at E(c.m.) = 4170 MeV, produced at the Cornell Electron Storage Ring collider and collected with the CLEO-c detector, we observe the process e+ e- → π+ π- h(c)(1P). We measure its cross section to be 15.6±2.3±1.9±3.0 pb, where the third error is due to the external uncertainty on the branching fraction of ψ(2S) → π0 h(c)(1P), which we use for normalization. We also find evidence for e+ e- → ηh(c)(1P) at 4170 MeV at the 3σ level and see hints of a rise in the e+ e- → π+ π- h(c)(1P) cross section at 4260 MeV. 相似文献
44.
Miller DH Sanghi B Shipsey IP Xin B Adams GS Anderson M Cummings JP Danko I Ge JY Hu D Moziak B Napolitano J He Q Insler J Muramatsu H Park CS Thorndike EH Yang F Artuso M Blusk S Khalil S Li J Menaa N Mountain R Nisar S Randrianarivony K Sia R Skwarnicki T Stone S Wang JC Bonvicini G Cinabro D Dubrovin M Lincoln A Asner DM Edwards KW Naik P Briere RA Ferguson T Tatishvili G Vogel H Watkins ME Rosner JL Adam NE Alexander JP Cassel DG Duboscq JE Ehrlich R Fields L Gibbons L Gray R Gray SW 《Physical review letters》2007,99(12):122002
We measure the mass of the eta meson using psi(2S) --> etaJ/psi events acquired with the CLEO-c detector operating at the CESR e(+)e(-) collider. Using the four decay modes eta --> gamma gamma, 3pi(0), pi(+)pi(-)pi(0), and pi(+)pi(-)gamma, we find M(eta) = 547.785 +/- 0.017 +/- 0.057 MeV, in which the first uncertainty is statistical and the second systematic. This result has an uncertainty comparable to the two most precise previous measurements and is consistent with that of NA48, but is inconsistent at the level of 6.5 sigma with the much smaller mass obtained by GEM. 相似文献
45.
Ecklund KM Love W Savinov V Lopez A Mendez H Ramirez J Ge JY Miller DH Shipsey IP Xin B Adams GS Anderson M Cummings JP Danko I Hu D Moziak B Napolitano J He Q Insler J Muramatsu H Park CS Thorndike EH Yang F Artuso M Blusk S Khalil S Li J Mountain R Nisar S Randrianarivony K Sultana N Skwarnicki T Stone S Wang JC Zhang LM Bonvicini G Cinabro D Dubrovin M Lincoln A Rademacker J Asner DM Edwards KW Naik P Reed J Briere RA Ferguson T Tatishvili G Vogel H Watkins ME Rosner JL Alexander JP 《Physical review letters》2008,100(16):161801
Using a sample of tagged D(s)(+) decays collected near the D(s)(*+/-)D(s)(-/+) peak production energy in e(+)e(-) collisions with the CLEO-c detector, we study the leptonic decay D(s)(+)-->tau(+)nu(tau) via the decay channel tau(+)-->e(+)nu(e)nu(tau). We measure B(D(s)(+)-->tau(+)nu(tau))=(6.17+/-0.71+/-0.34)%, where the first error is statistical and the second systematic. Combining this result with our measurements of D(s)(+)-->mu(+)nu(mu) and D(s)(+)-->tau(+)nu(tau) (via tau(+)-->pi(+)nu(tau)), we determine f(D(s))=(274+/-10+/-5) MeV. 相似文献
46.
Brown DN Fast J McIlwain RL Miao T Miller DH Modesitt M Payne D Shibata EI Shipsey IP Wang PN Battle M Ernst J Kwon Y Roberts S Thorndike EH Wang CH Dominick J Lambrecht M Sanghera S Shelkov V Skwarnicki T Stroynowski R Volobouev I Wei G Zadorozhny P Artuso M Goldberg M He D Horwitz N Kennett R Mountain R Moneti GC Muheim F Mukhin Y Playfer S Rozen Y Stone S Thulasidas M Vasseur G Zhu G Bartelt J Csorna SE Egyed Z Jain V Kinoshita K Edwards KW Ogg M Britton DI Hyatt ER MacFarlane DB Patel PM 《Physical review D: Particles and fields》1994,50(3):1884-1891
47.
Butler F Fu X Nemati B Ross WR Skubic P Wood M Bishai M Fast J Gerndt E Hinson JW McIlwain RL Miao T Miller DH Modesitt M Payne D Shibata EI Shipsey IP Wang PN Gibbons L Kwon Y Roberts S Thorndike EH Coan TE Dominick J Fadeyev V Korolkov I Lambrecht M Sanghera S Shelkov V Skwarnicki T Stroynowski R Volobouev I Wei G Artuso M Gao M Goldberg M He D Horwitz N Moneti GC Mountain R Muheim F Mukhin Y Playfer S Rozen Y Stone S Xing X Zhu G Bartelt J Csorna SE Egyed Z Jain V Gibaut D Kinoshita K 《Physical review D: Particles and fields》1995,52(5):2656-2660
48.
Haas P Hempstead M Jensen T Kagan H Kass R Behrends S Gentile T Guida JM Guida JA Morrow F Poling R Rosenfeld C Thorndike EH Tipton P Green J Namjoshi R Sannes F Stone R Alam MS Katayama N Kim IJ Sun CR Tanikella V Bortoletto D Chen A Garren L Goldberg M Horwitz N Jawahery A Lubrano P Moneti GC Csorna SE Mestayer MD Panvini RS Word GB Yi X Bean A Bobbink GJ Brock I Engler A Ferguson T Kraemer R Rippich C Sutton R Vogel H Bebek C Berkelman K Blucher E Cassel DG Copie T DeSalvo R DeWire JW 《Physical review letters》1986,56(26):2781-2784
49.
Haas P Hempstead M Jensen T Johnson DR Kagan H Kass R Baringer P McIlwain RL Miller DH Ng CR Shibata EI Behrends S Guida JM Guida JA Morrow F Poling R Thorndike EH Tipton P Alam MS Katayama N Kim IJ Li WC Lou XC Sun CR Tanikella V Bortoletto D Goldberg M Holmes R Horwitz N Jawahery A Lubrano P Moneti GC Sharma V Shipsey IP Thoma P Csorna SE Letson T Mestayer MD Panvini RS Word GB Bean A Bobbink GJ Brock IC Ferguson T Kraemer RW Vogel H Bebek C Berkelman K Blucher E Cassel DG Copie T DeSalvo R 《Physical review letters》1988,60(16):1614-1617
50.
Dobbs S Metreveli Z Seth KK Tomaradze A Zweber P Ernst J Mahmood AH Severini H Asner DM Dytman SA Love W Mehrabyan S Mueller JA Savinov V Li Z Lopez A Mendez H Ramirez J Huang GS Miller DH Pavlunin V Sanghi B Shibata EI Shipsey IP Adams GS Chasse M Cravey M Cummings JP Danko I Napolitano J Cronin-Hennessy D Park CS Park W Thayer JB Thorndike EH Coan TE Gao YS Liu F Artuso M Boulahouache C Blusk S Butt J Dambasuren E Dorjkhaidav O Menaa N Mountain R Muramatsu H Nandakumar R Redjimi R Sia R 《Physical review letters》2005,94(3):032004
We report on a search for the recently reported X(3872) state using 15.1 fb(-1) of e(+)e(-) data taken in the sqrt[s] = 9.46-11.30 GeV region. Separate searches for the production of the X(3872) in untagged gammagamma fusion and e(+)e(-) annihilation following initial state radiation are made by taking advantage of the unique angular correlation between the leptons from the decay J/psi --> l(+)l(-) in X(3872) decay to pi(+)pi(-)J/psi. No signals are observed in either case, and 90% confidence upper limits are established as (2J+1)Gamma(gammagamma)(X(3872))B(X --> pi(+)pi(-)J/psi) < 12.9 eV and Gamma(ee)(X(3872))B(X- -> pi(+)pi(-)J/psi) < 8.3 eV. 相似文献