排序方式： 共有107条查询结果，搜索用时 15 毫秒
11.
Adams GS Chasse M Cravey M Cummings JP Danko I Napolitano J Cronin-Hennessy D Park CS Park W Thayer JB Thorndike EH Coan TE Gao YS Liu F Stroynowski R Artuso M Boulahouache C Blusk S Butt J Dambasuren E Dorjkhaidav O Menaa N Mountain R Muramatsu H Nandakumar R Redjimi R Sia R Skwarnicki T Stone S Wang JC Zhang K Csorna SE Bonvicini G Cinabro D Dubrovin M Bornheim A Pappas SP Weinstein AJ Briere RA Chen GP Ferguson T Tatishvili G Vogel H Watkins ME Adam NE Alexander JP Berkelman K Cassel DG 《Physical review letters》2005,94(1):012001
The decay branching fractions of the three narrow Upsilon resonances to mu(+)mu(-) have been measured by analyzing about 4.3 fb(-1) e(+)e(-) data collected with the CLEO III detector. The branching fraction B(Upsilon(1S)-->mu(+)mu(-))=(2.49+/-0.02+/-0.07)% is consistent with the current world average, but B(Upsilon(2S)-->mu(+)mu(-))=(2.03+/-0.03+/-0.08)% and B(Upsilon(3S)-->mu(+)mu(-))=(2.39+/-0.07+/-0.10)% are significantly larger than prior results. These new muonic branching fractions imply a narrower total decay width for the Upsilon(2S) and Upsilon(3S) resonances and lower other branching fractions that rely on these decays in their determination. 相似文献
12.
Huang GS Miller DH Pavlunin V Sanghi B Shibata EI Shipsey IP Adams GS Chasse M Cummings JP Danko I Napolitano J Cronin-Hennessy D Park CS Park W Thayer JB Thorndike EH Coan TE Gao YS Liu F Stroynowski R Artuso M Boulahouache C Blusk S Butt J Dambasuren E Dorjkhaidav O Menaa N Mountain R Muramatsu H Nandakumar R Redjimi R Sia R Skwarnicki T Stone S Wang JC Zhang K Mahmood AH Csorna SE Bonvicini G Cinabro D Dubrovin M Bornheim A Lipeles E Pappas SP Weinstein AJ Briere RA Chen GP Ferguson T 《Physical review letters》2005,94(1):011802
We investigate the decays D(0)-->pi(-)l(+)nu and D(0)-->K(-)l(+)nu, where l is e or mu, using approximately 7 fb(-1) of data collected with the CLEO III detector. We find R(0) identical with B(D(0)-->pi(-)e(+)nu)/B(D(0)-->K(-)e(+)nu)=0.082+/-0.006+/-0.005. Fits to the kinematic distributions of the data provide parameters describing the form factor of each mode. Combining the form factor results and R(0) gives |f(pi)(+)(0)|(2)|V(cd)|(2)/|f(K)(+)(0)|(2)|V(cs)|(2)=0.038(+0.006+0.005)(-0.007-0.003). 相似文献
13.
14.
Crawford G Daubenmier CM Fulton R Fujino D Gan KK Honscheid K Kagan H Kass R Lee J Malchow R Morrow F Skovpen Y Sung M White C Whitmore J Wilson P Butler F Fu X Kalbfleisch G Lambrecht M Ross WR Skubic P Snow J Wang PL Wood M Bortoletto D Brown DN Fast J McIlwain RL Miao T Miller DH Modesitt M Schaffner SF Shibata EI Shipsey IP Wang PN Battle M Ernst J Kroha H Roberts S Sparks K Thorndike EH Wang CH Dominick J Sanghera S Skwarnicki T Stoynowski R Artuso M He D Goldberg M Horwitz N Kennett R 《Physical review letters》1993,71(20):3259-3262
15.
Alam MS Kim IJ Nemati B O'Neill JJ Severini H Sun CR Zoeller MM Crawford G Daubenmier CM Fulton R Fujino D Gan KK Honscheid K Kagan H Kass R Lee J Malchow R Morrow F Skovpen Y Sung M White C Butler F Fu X Kalbfleisch G Ross WR Skubic P Snow J Wang PL Wood M Brown DN Fast J McIlwain RL Miao T Miller DH Modesitt M Payne D Shibata EI Shipsey IP Wang PN Battle M Ernst J Kwon Y Roberts S Thorndike EH Wang CH Dominick J Lambrecht M Sanghera S Shelkov V Skwarnicki T Stroynowski R Volobouev I Wei G 《Physical review D: Particles and fields》1994,50(1):43-68
16.
Battle M Ernst J Kwon Y Roberts S Thorndike EH Wang CH Dominick J Lambrecht M Sanghera S Shelkov V Skwarnicki T Stroynowski R Volobouev I Wei G Zadorozhny P Artuso M Goldberg M He D Horwitz N Kennett R Mountain R Moneti GC Muheim F Mukhin Y Playfer S Rozen Y Stone S Thulasidas M Vasseur G Zhu G Bartelt J Csorna SE Egyed Z Jain V Kinoshita K Edwards KW Ogg M Britton DI Hyatt ER MacFarlane DB Patel PM Akerib DS Barish B Chadha M Chan S Cowen DF Eigen G Miller JS O'Grady C Urheim J Weinstein AJ 《Physical review letters》1994,73(8):1079-1083
17.
Kubota Y Lattery M Nelson JK Patton S Perticone D Poling R Savinov V Schrenk S Wang R Alam MS Kim IJ Nemati B O'Neill JJ Severini H Sun CR Zoeller MM Crawford G Daubenmier CM Fulton R Fujino D Gan KK Honscheid K Kagan H Kass R Lee J Malchow R Morrow F Skovpen Y Sung M White C Butler F Fu X Kalbfleisch G Ross WR Skubic P Snow J Wang PL Wood M Brown DN Fast J McIlwain RL Miao T Miller DH Modesitt M Payne D Shibata EI Shipsey IP Wang PN Battle M Ernst J Kwon Y Roberts S Thorndike EH Wang CH 《Physical review letters》1994,72(13):1972-1976
18.
Kubota Y Nelson JK Perticone D Poling R Schrenk S Crawford G Fulton R Jensen T Johnson DR Kagan H Kass R Malchow R Morrow F Whitmore J Wilson P Bortoletto D Brown D Dominick J McIlwain RL Miller DH Modesitt M Ng CR Schaffner SF Shibata EI Shipsey IP Battle M Kroha H Sparks K Thorndike EH Wang C Alam MS Kim IJ Li WC Nemati B Romero V Sun CR Wang P Zoeller MM Goldberg M Haupt T Horwitz N Jain V Mestayer MD Moneti GC Rozen Y Rubin P Skwarnicki T Stone S Thusalidas M Yao W Zhu G Barnes AV Bartelt J 《Physical review D: Particles and fields》1991,44(3):593-600
19.
Eno S Auchincloss P Blanis D Bodek A Budd H Fry CA Harada H Ho YH Kim YK Kumita T Mori T Olsen SL Shaw NM Sill A Thorndike EH Ueno K Zheng HW Imlay R Kirk P Lim J McNeil RR Metcalf W Myung SS Cheng CP Gu P Li J Li YK Mao ZP Xu YT Zhu YC Abashian A Gotow K Hu KP Low EH Mattson ME Piilonen L Sterner KL Lusin S Rosenfeld C Wang AT Wilson S Frautschi M Kagan H Kass R Trahern CG Breedon RE Kim GN Ko W Lander RL Maeshima K Malchow RL Smith JR Stuart D Williams MC Abe K Fujii Y Higashi Y Kim SK 《Physical review letters》1989,63(18):1910-1913
20.
Kim YK Auchincloss P Blanis D Bodek A Budd H Eno S Fry CA Harada H Ho YH Kumita T Mori T Olsen SL Shaw NM Sill A Thorndike EH Ueno K Zheng HW Imlay R Kirk P Lim J McNeil RR Metcalf W Myung SS Cheng CP Gu P Li J Li YK Mao ZP Xu YT Zhu YC Abashian A Gotow K Hu KP Low EH Mattson ME Piilonen L Sterner KL Lusin S Rosenfeld C Wang AT Wilson S Frautschi M Kagan H Kass R Trahern CG Breedon RE Kim GN Ko W Lander RL Maeshima K Malchow RL Smith JR Stuart D Williams MC Abe K Fujii Y Higashi Y Kim SK 《Physical review letters》1989,63(17):1772-1775