Strategies of karyotype differentiation in Elateridae (Coleoptera, Polyphaga)

The chromosome study of five species of the family Elateridae, belonging to the subfamilies Agrypninae and Elaterinae, and the analysis of the cytogenetic data previously recorded for this family permitted the establishment of the main strategies of karyotypic differentiation that has occurred in the elaterids. In Agrypninae, the three species studied (Conoderus fuscofasciatus, Conoderus rufidens, and Conoderus sp.) showed the male karyotype 2n=16+X0. This karyotypic uniformity detected in these Conoderus species has also been shared with other species of the same genus, differing considerably from chromosomal heterogeneity verified in the subfamily Agrypninae. The use of the C-banding technique in C. fuscofasciatus and Conoderus sp. revealed constitutive heterochromatin in the pericentromeric region of the majority of the chromosomes. In C. fuscofasciatus, additional constitutive heterochromatin were also observed in the long arm terminal region of almost all chromosomes. Among the representatives of Elaterinae, the karyotype 2n=18+Xy(p) of Pomachilius sp.2 was similar to that verified in the majority of the Coleoptera species, contrasting with the chromosomal formula 2n=18+X0 detected in Cardiorhinus rufilateris, which is most common in the species of Elaterinae. In the majority of the elaterids, the chromosomal differentiation has frequently been driven by reduction of the diploid number; but, among the four cytogenetically examined subfamilies, there are some differences in relation to the trends of karyotypic evolution.     

Coarsening of mass-selected Au clusters on amorphous carbon at room temperature

Low-energy cluster beam deposition was used to deposit mass-selected Au_n clusters (n = 4, 6, 13 and 20) on amorphous carbon (a-C) substrates. The resulting samples were stored at room temperature under ambient conditions for time periods up to 32 months to analyze the coarsening behaviour of the clusters. Cluster-size distributions were measured in regular time intervals by transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The TEM experiments show a significant increase of the average cluster size with time analogous to classical surface Ostwald ripening (OR). The coarsening of Au clusters can be well described by steady-state diffusion-limited kinetics. The derived surface mass-transport diffusion coefficients at room temperature range between 1.1 and 3.8·10⁻²⁵ m² s⁻¹ for our samples. A detailed analysis of values suggests that, the rate of the surface OR for mass-selected Au_n clusters increases with the cluster size in the sequence: Au₄ ≈ Au₆ < Au₁₃ < Au₂₀ for the investigated range of Au clusters. Given that the initial, on-surface cluster-size distributions are nominally monodisperse, classical OR with cluster coarsening based only on the Gibbs-Thomson effect cannot explain the observed coarsening. The activation of the coarsening process is rationalized by initial variations of the cluster sizes due to the deposition process itself and/or the interaction of the clusters with the substrate. Moreover, the presence of initial deposited Au clusters as different isomers with slightly different chemical potential on the substrate, may also initiate the coarsening by surface OR. Furthermore, we find that the coarsening is most pronounced for the paucidispersed sample with Au_m (10 ? m ? 20) clusters. A possible explanation of this behaviour is the presence of an initial distribution of different cluster sizes directly after deposition.     

Why Perform Code‐to‐Code Comparisons: A Vacuum Arc Discharge Simulation Case Study

Numerical modeling is increasingly becoming an indispensable tool for investigations in many fields of physics. Such modeling is especially useful in today's big science projects as a tool that can provide predictions and design parameters. The reliability of simulation results is thus essential. Code‐to‐code comparisons can help increase our confidence in simulation results, especially when other verification methods – such as comparison to theoretical models or experimental results – are limited or unavailable. In this paper, we describe a code‐to‐code comparison exercise wherein we compare one‐dimensional vacuum arc discharge simulation results from two independent particle‐in‐cell (PIC) codes. As part of our case study, we define a vacuum arc discharge test problem that can be used by other research groups for further comparison. Early disagreement between the two sets of our results motivated us to re‐examine the underlying methods in our codes. After remedying discrepancies, we observe good agreement in vacuum arc discharge time‐to‐breakdown, as well as in the time evolution of particle and current densities. This exercise demonstrates the usefulness of code‐to‐code comparisons and provides an example case study for the benefit of other research groups who may wish to carry out similar code‐to‐code comparisons (© 2012 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)