1-Homogeneous Graphs with Cocktail Party μ-Graphs

Let be a graph with diameter d 2. Recall is 1-homogeneous (in the sense of Nomura) whenever for every edge xy of the distance partition{{z V() | (z, y) = i, (x, z) = j} | 0 i, j d}is equitable and its parameters do not depend on the edge xy. Let be 1-homogeneous. Then is distance-regular and also locally strongly regular with parameters (v,k,,), where v = k, k = a ₁, (v – k – 1) = k(k – 1 – ) and c ₂ + 1, since a -graph is a regular graph with valency . If c ₂ = + 1 and c ₂ 1, then is a Terwilliger graph, i.e., all the -graphs of are complete. In [11] we classified the Terwilliger 1-homogeneous graphs with c ₂ 2 and obtained that there are only three such examples. In this article we consider the case c ₂ = + 2 3, i.e., the case when the -graphs of are the Cocktail Party graphs, and obtain that either = 0, = 2 or is one of the following graphs: (i) a Johnson graph J(2m, m) with m 2, (ii) a folded Johnson graph J¯(4m, 2m) with m 3, (iii) a halved m-cube with m 4, (iv) a folded halved (2m)-cube with m 5, (v) a Cocktail Party graph K _{m × 2} with m 3, (vi) the Schläfli graph, (vii) the Gosset graph.     

Effects of uncertainties in the domain on the solution of Dirichlet boundary value problems

Summary. A domain with possibly non-Lipschitz boundary is defined as a limit of monotonically expanding or shrinking domains with Lipschitz boundary. A uniquely solvable Dirichlet boundary value problem (DBVP) is defined on each of the Lipschitz domains and the limit of these solutions is investigated. The limit function also solves a DBVP on the limit domain but the problem can depend on the sequences of domains if the limit domain is unstable with respect to the DBVP. The core of the paper consists in estimates of the difference between the respective solutions of the DBVP on two close domains, one of which is Lipschitz and the other can be unstable. Estimates for starshaped as well as rather general domains are derived. Their numerical evaluation is possible and can be done in different ways. Received October 16, 2001 / Revised version received January 16, 2002 / Published online: April 17, 2002 RID="*" ID="*" The research was funded partially by the National Science Foundation under the grants NSF–Czech Rep. INT-9724783 and NSF DMS-9802367 RID="**" ID="**" Support for Jan Chleboun coming from the Grant Agency of the Czech Republic through grant 201/98/0528 is appreciated     

Some results on starlike trees and sunlike graphs

A tree is called starlike if it has exactly one vertex of degree greater than two. In [4] it was proved that two starlike treesG andH are cospectral if and only if they are isomorphic. We prove here that there exist no two non-isomorphic Laplacian cospectral starlike trees. Further, letG be a simple graph of ordern with vertex setV(G)={1,2, …,n} and letH={H ₁,H ₂, ...H _n } be a family of rooted graphs. According to [2], the rooted productG(H) is the graph obtained by identifying the root ofH _i with thei-th vertex ofG. In particular, ifH is the family of the paths $P_{k_1 } , P_{k_2 } , ..., P_{k_n } $ with the rooted vertices of degree one, in this paper the corresponding graphG(H) is called the sunlike graph and is denoted byG(k ₁,k ₂, …,k _n ). For any (x ₁,x ₂, …,x _n ) ∈I _* ⁿ , whereI _*={0,1}, letG(x ₁,x ₂, …,x _n ) be the subgraph ofG which is obtained by deleting the verticesi ₁, i₂, …,i _j ∈ V(G) (0≤j≤n), provided that $x_{i_1 } = x_{i_2 } = ... = x_{i_j } = 0$ . LetG(x ₁,x ₂,…, x _n] be the characteristic polynomial ofG(x ₁,x ₂,…, x _n ), understanding thatG[0, 0, …, 0] ≡ 1. We prove that $$G[k_1 , k_2 ,..., k_n ] = \Sigma _{x \in ^{I_ * ^n } } \left[ {\Pi _{i = 1}^n P_{k_i + x_i - 2} (\lambda )} \right]( - 1)^{n - (\mathop \Sigma \limits_{i = 1}^n x_i )} G[x_1 , x_2 , ..., x_n ]$$ where x=(x ₁,x ₂,…,x _n );G[k ₁,k ₂,…,k _n ] andP _n (γ) denote the characteristic polynomial ofG(k ₁,k ₂,…,k _n ) andP _n , respectively. Besides, ifG is a graph with λ₁(G)≥1 we show that λ₁(G)≤λ₁(G(k ₁,k ₂, ...,k _n )) < for all positive integersk ₁,k ₂,…,k _n , where λ₁ denotes the largest eigenvalue.     

A remark on Lorentz algebras

We consider the class of Euclidean algebras associated to Minkowski light cones and called Lorentz algebras. We prove that in Lorentz algebras the estimate ∥P(a,b) ∥_∞≥(√2-1) ∥a∥_∞ ∥b∥_∞ is valid for the spectral norm and is therefore independent of the dimension of the Lorentz algebra.     

Higher-Order Convex Approximations of Young Measures in Optimal Control

The general theory of approximation of (possibly generalized) Young measures is presented, and concrete cases are investigated. An adjoint-operator approach, combined with quasi-interpolation of test integrands, is systematically used. Applicability is demonstrated on an optimal control problem for an elliptic system, together with one-dimensional illustrative calculations of various options.     

The bestL 2-approximation by finite sums of functions with separable variables

Summary We consider the problem of the best approximation of a given functionh L ² (X × Y) by sums _k=1 ⁿ f _k f _k, with a prescribed numbern of products of arbitrary functionsf _k L ² (X) andg _k L ² (Y). As a co-product we develop a new proof of the Hilbert—Schmidt decomposition theorem for functions lying inL ² (X × Y).     

Locking effects in the finite element approximation of elasticity problems

Summary We consider the finite element approximation of the 2D elasticity problem when the Poisson ratiov is close to 0.5. It is well-known that the performance of certain commonly used finite elements deteriorates asv0, a phenomenon calledlocking. We analyze this phenomenon and characterize the strength of the locking androbustness of varioush-version schemes using triangular and rectangular elements. We prove that thep-andh-p versions are free of locking with respect to the error in the energy norm. A generalization of our theory to the 3D problem is also discussed.The work of this author was supported in part by the Office of Naval Research under Naval Research Grant N00014-90-J-1030The work of this author was supported in part by the Air Force Office of Scientific Research, Air Force Systems Command, U.S. Air Force, under grant AFOSR 89-0252     

Approximation by a binomial type law

Kaunas Academy of Agriculture, 4324 Noreikiškés, Lithuania. Translated from Lietuvos Matematikos Rinkinys, Vol. 32, No. 2, pp. 221–228, April–June, 1992.     

The Proof That the Standard Transformations of E and B Are Not the Lorentz Transformations

In this paper it is exactly proved that the standard transformations of the three-dimensional (3D) vectors of the electric and magnetic fields E and B are not relativistically correct transformations. Thence the 3D vectors E and B are not well-defined quantities in the 4D space-time and, contrary to the general belief, the usual Maxwell equations with the 3D E and B are not in agreement with the special relativity. The 4-vectors E ^a and B ^a , as well-defined 4D quantities, are introduced instead of ill-defined 3D E and B. The proof is given in the tensor and the Clifford algebra formalisms.