A solution of the DGLAP equation for gluon at low x

We obtain a solution of the DGLAP equation for the gluon at low x first by expanding the gluon in a Taylor series and then using the method of characteristics. We test its validity by comparing it with that of Glück, Reya and Vogt. The convergence criteria of the approximation used are also discussed. We also calculate εF ₂(x,Q)²/ε In Q ² using its approximate relations with the gluon distribution at low x. The predictions are then compared with the HERA data.     

Micelle‐catalyzed reaction of ninhydrin with DL‐valine in the absence and presence of organic solvents

Kinetics of the DL ‐valine‐ninhydrin reaction has been studied spectrophotometrically under varying conditions of [CTAB], [ninhydrin], [DL ‐valine], pH, temperature, and %(v/v) organic solvents (solvents used: 1‐propanol, methylcellosolve, acetonitrile, and dimethyl sulfoxide). Addition of CTAB and increase in the proportion of organic solvents, both showed catalyzing effect on the reaction. The effect of simultaneous presence of CTAB and DMSO in the reaction mixture has also been seen. The rate profiles obtained for solutions containing from 10% to 70% DMSO exhibited clear maxima that shifted progressively to higher concentrations of CTAB. The experimental results are explained in terms of specific solvent effects and the formation of stoichiometric hydrate DMSO · 2H₂O and the inhibitory effect of DMSO on micelle formation. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Int J Chem Kinet 38: 634–642, 2006     

Iron-Chloranilate Intercalation Compounds: Synthesis,Crystal Structures,and Thermal Properties

Abstract

Hydrogen bond supported new iron-chloranilate assemblies, {(Hpy)[Fe(CA)₂(H₂O)₂](H₂O)}_n (py = pyridine, H₂CA = chloranilic acid, C₆H₂O₄Cl₂) (1), and [(phz)₂[Fe(CA)₂(H₂O)₂](H₂O)₂]_n (phz = phenazine, C₁₂H₈N₂) (2) have been synthesized and characterized. Compound 2 crystallizes in the monoclinic, space group C2/m (#12), with a= 29.135(6) Å, b= 16.886(6) Å, c = 15.017(5) Å, ß = 165.907(1)°, V= 1798(2) ų, Z = 2. In both the compounds two chloranilate dianions and two water molecules are coordinated to the iron ion making anionic monomers [Fe(CA)₂(H₂O)₂]^?, which are the building blocks of the compounds. The coordination environment around the iron ion in the building block is a distorted octahedron, where two water molecules sit on the trans position to each other. [Fe(CA)₂(H₂O)₂]^? anions form common layer structures, supported by hydrogen bonds. Hpy⁺ are intercalated in between the layers of 1 by electrostatic and hydrogen bonding interactions and phz are intercalated in that of 2 by electrostatic interactions. DSC traces of 1 show anomaly at 174 K, indicating phase transition in the compound.     

Reactions of [Mn2(μ-pyS)2(CO)6] with bidentate N-donor ligands: Crystal structure of [Mn(η1-pyS)(bipy)(CO)3] (bipy = 2,2′-bipyridyl, pySH = pyridine-2-thiol)

The dimeric complex [Mn₂(-pyS)₂(CO)₆] (1) reacted with 2 equivalents of 2,2-bipyridyl (bipy), 1,10-phenanthroline (phen), and ethylenediamine (en) to give the corresponding monomeric complexes [Mn(¹-pyS)(bipy)(CO)₃] (2), [Mn(¹-pyS)(phen)(CO)₃] (3), and [Mn( ¹-pyS)(en)(CO)₃] (4). The pyS ligand in these complexes acts as a monodentate, two-electron donor ligand, which coordinates to manganese through the sulfur atom. This is confirmed by an X-ray structure determination of 2, which contains two structural isomers in the asymmetric unit. Crystals of this compound are the monoclinic, space group P2 ₁/c, a = 21.593(4), b = 10.463(2), c = 16.385(3) Å, = 102.468(13)°, V = 3614.5(12) ų, and Z = 8. The three CO groups are facially distributed in both isomers, but the relative positions of the pyS and bipy ligands are different.     

Reaction of [Ru3(CO)12] with tri(2-furyl)phosphine: Di- and tri-substituted triruthenium and phosphido-bridged diruthenium complexes

Reaction of [Ru₃(CO)₁₂] with tri(2-furyl)phosphine, P(C₄H₃O)₃, at 40 °C in the presence of a catalytic amount of Na[Ph₂CO] furnishes two triruthenium complexes [Ru₃(CO)₁₀{P(C₄H₃O)₃}₂] (1) and [Ru₃(CO)₉{P(C₄H₃O)₃}₃] (2) with the ligand coordinated through the phosphorus atom. Treatment of 1 and 2 with Me₃NO at 40 °C affords the dinuclear phosphido-bridged complexes [Ru₂(CO)₆(μ-η¹,η²-C₄H₃O){μ-P(C₄H₃O)₂}] (3) and [Ru₂(CO)₅(μ-η¹,η²-C₄H₃O){μ-P(C₄H₃O)₂}{P(C₄H₃O)₃}] (4), respectively, that are formed via phosphorus–carbon bond cleavage of a coordinated phosphine followed by coordination of the dissociated furyl moiety to the diruthenium center in a σ,π-alkenyl mode. Reaction of [Ru₃(CO)₁₂] with tri(2-furyl)phosphine in refluxing benzene gives, in addition to 3 and 4, low yields of the cyclometallated complex [Ru₃(CO)₉{μ-η¹,η¹-P(C₄H₃O)₂(C₄H₂O)}₂] (5). Treatment of 3 with EPh₃ (E = P, As, Sb) at room temperature yields the monosubstituted derivatives [Ru₂(CO)₅(μ-η¹,η²-C₄H₃O){μ-P(C₄H₃O)₂}(EPh₃)] (E = P, 8; E = As, 9; E = Sb, 10). Similar reactions of 3 with P(C₄H₃O)₃, P(OMe)₃ and Bu^tNC yield 4, [Ru₂(CO)₅(μ-η¹,η²-C₄H₃O){μ-P(C₄H₃O)₂}{P(OMe)₃}] (11) and [Ru₂(CO)₅(μ-η¹,η²-C₄H₃O){μ-P(C₄H₃O)₂}(NCBu^t)] (12), respectively. The molecular structures of complexes 3, 4 and 8 have been elucidated by single crystal X-ray diffraction studies. Each complex contains a bridging σ,π-alkenyl group and while in 4 the phosphine is bound to the σ-coordinated metal atom, in 8 it is at the π-bound atom. Protonation of 3 and 4 gives the hydride complexes [(μ-H)Ru₂(CO)₆(μ-η¹,η²-C₄H₃O){μ-P(C₄H₃O)₂}]⁺ (6) and [(μ-H)Ru₂(CO)₅(μ-η¹,η²-C₄H₃O){μ-P(C₄H₃O)₂}{P(C₄H₃O)₃}]⁺ (7), respectively, while heating 3 with dimethylacetylenedicarboxylate (DMAD) in refluxing toluene gives the cyclotrimerization product, C₆(CO₂Me)₆.     

An Electron-Deficient Triosmium Cluster Containing the Thianthrene Ligand: Synthesis, Structure and Reactivity of [Os3(CO)9(μ3-η2-C12H7S2)(μ-H)]

Reaction of [Os₃(CO)₁₀(CH₃CN)₂] with thianthrene at 80 °C leads to the nonacarbonyl dihydride compound [Os₃(CO)₉(μ-3,4-η²-C₁₂H₆S₂)(μ-H)₂] (1) and the 46-electron monohydride compound [Os₃(CO)₉(μ₃-η²-C₁₂H₇S₂)(μ-H)] (2). Compound 2 reacts reversibly with CO to give the CO adduct [Os₃(CO)₁₀(μ-η²-C₁₂H₇S₂)(μ-H)] (3) whereas with PPh₃ it gives the addition product [Os₃(CO)₉)(PPh₃)(μ-η²-C₁₂H₇S₂)(μ-H)] (4) as well as the substitution product 1,2-[Os₃(CO)₁₀((PPh₃)₂] (5) Compound 2 represents a unique example of an electron-deficient triosmium cluster in which the thianthrene ring is bound to cluster by coordination of the sulfur lone pair and a three-center-two-electron bond with the C(2) carbon which bridges the same edge of the triangle as the hydride. Electrochemical and DFT studies which elucidate the electronic properties of 2 are reported. Dedicated to the memory of a great scientist, F. Albert Cotton.     

Fabric phase sorptive extraction: An innovative sample preparation approach applied to the analysis of specific migration from food packaging

Additives added to food packaging materials can migrate to food in contact with them during storage and shelf life. A novel simple, fast and sensitive analyte extraction method based on fabric phase sorptive extraction (FPSE), followed by analysis using ultra-high performance liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry detection (UPLC-MS) was applied to the analysis of 18 common non-volatile plastic additives. Three FPSE media coated with different sol-gel sorbents characterized with different polarities including sol-gel poly(dimethylsiloxane), sol-gel poly(ethylene glycol) and sol-gel poly(tetrahydrofuran) were studied. All three FPSE media showed very satisfactory results. In general, compounds with low logP values seemed to have higher enrichment factors (EFs), especially with poly(tetrahydrofuran) and poly(ethylene glycol) media. For compounds with high logP values, the use of sol-gel poly(dimethylsiloxane) improved the enrichment capacity. Sample preparation time was optimized at 20 min for sample extraction and 10 min for solvent desorption. Acetonitrile was selected as desorption solvent since recoveries were over 70% for 13 out of 18 selected compounds in all FPSE media. The best extraction recovery values were obtained when compounds were dissolved in aqueous acetic acid solution (3%), where 17 out of 18 compounds showed improvement in their signal intensity after FPSE extraction and 10 obtained enrichment factors above 3 for all the tested FPSE media. When FPSE extracts were concentrated under nitrogen, 11 out of 18 compounds reached EFs values above 100.