Cyclodextrin‐Based Supramolecular Assemblies and Hydrogels: Recent Advances and Future Perspectives

The application of cyclodextrin (CD)‐based host–guest interactions towards the fabrication of functional supramolecular assemblies and hydrogels is of particular interest in the field of biomedicine. However, as of late they have found new applications as advanced functional materials (e.g., actuators and self‐healing materials), which have renewed interest across a wide range of fields. Advanced supramolecular materials synthesized using this noncovalent interaction, exhibit specificity and reversibility, which can be used to impart reversible cross‐linking, specific binding sites, and functionality. In this review, various functional CD‐based supramolecular assemblies and hydrogels will be outlined with the focus on recent advances. In addition, an outlook will be provided on the direction of this rapidly developing field.

     

Stereospecific Cyclic Poly(methyl methacrylate) and Its Topology‐Guided Hierarchically Controlled Supramolecular Assemblies

In this study, the stereocomplexation between a novel stereospecific cyclic vinyl polymer, that is, cyclic syndiotactic poly(methyl methacrylate) (st‐PMMA), with the complementary linear isotactic (it‐) PMMA was investigated. Surprising new insight into the effects of the topology (i.e., end groups), size, and tacticity of the assembling components on stereocomplex formation was obtained. Characterization of the stereocomplexes revealed that the self‐assembly of cyclic st‐PMMAs and linear it‐PMMAs resulted in the formation of an unprecedented “polypseudorotaxane‐type” supramolecular assembly. This stereocomplex exhibited remarkably different physical properties as compared to the conventional PMMA triple‐helix stereocomplex as a result of the restricted topology imposed by the cyclic st‐PMMA assembling component.     

Stabilization of Peptide‐Based Vesicles via in situ Oxygen‐Mediated Cross‐Linking

Reversible vesicles from poly(L ‐glutamic acid)₆₅‐block‐poly[(L ‐lysine)‐ran‐(L ‐3,4‐dihydroxyphenylalanine)]₇₅ [PLGA₆₅‐b‐P(LL‐r‐DOPA)₇₅] block copolypeptide adopt different configurations depending on the surrounding pH. At pH = 3, AFM and TEM images show ellipsoidal morphologies, whereas at pH = 12 both TEM and AFM reveal the formation of hollow vesicles. At pH = 12, the P(LL‐r‐DOPA) block forms the internal layer of the vesicle shell and the subsequent oxygen‐mediated oxidation of the phenolic groups of the DOPA lead to the formation of quinonic intermediates, which undergo intermolecular dimerization to stabilize the vesicles via in situ cross‐linking. Consequently, the vesicles maintain their shape even when the pH is reversed back to 3, as confirmed by AFM and TEM.

     

Highly Efficient Synthesis of Low Polydispersity Core Cross‐Linked Star Polymers by Ru‐Catalyzed Living Radical Polymerization

The efficient formation of low polydispersity core cross‐linked star (CCS) polymers via controlled/living radical polymerization (LRP) and the arm‐first approach was found to be dependant on the mediating catalyst system. The Ru catalyst, Ru(Ind)Cl(PPh₃)₂ Cat. 1 , and tertiary amine co‐catalyst were used to synthesize highly living poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) macroinitiators, which were then linked together with ethylene glycol dimethacrylate (EGDMA) to form PMMA_armPEGDMA_core CCS polymers. The quantitative and near‐quantitative synthesis of CCS polymers were observed for low to moderate molecular weight macroinitiators ( = 8 and 20 kDa), respectively. Lower conversions were observed for high‐molecular weight macroinitiators ( ≥ 60 kDa). Overall, an improvement of between 10 and 20% was observed when comparing the Cat. 1 system to a conventional Cu‐catalyzed system. This significant improvement in macroinitiator‐to‐star conversion is explained in the context of catalyst system selection and CCS polymer formation.

     

Synthesis and photoreactivity of aryl substituted 4,5-dithienyl[1,3]dithiol-2-ones

UV irradiation of hitherto unknown 4,5-bis-benzo[b]thiophen-3-yl-[1,3]dithiol-2-one gave 3-(3-benzo[b]thienyl)-thieno[3,4-c]benzo[e][1,2]dithiine by loss of carbon monoxide and rearrangement, whereas 4,5-bis-(2-bromo-phenyl)-[1,3]dithiol-2-one gave a polymeric material containing S-S bridges. The structures of both photoproducts were demonstrated on the basis of chemical behaviour and/or X-ray diffraction.