Elementary Steps of Iron Catalysis: Exploring the Links between Iron Alkyl and Iron Olefin Complexes for their Relevance in C?H Activation and C?C Bond Formation

The alkylation of complexes 2 and 7 with Grignard reagents containing β‐hydrogen atoms is a process of considerable relevance for the understanding of C–H activation as well as C–C bond formation mediated by low‐valent iron species. Specifically, reaction of 2 with EtMgBr under an ethylene atmosphere affords the bis‐ethylene complex 1 which is an active precatalyst for prototype [2+2+2] cycloaddition reactions and a valuable probe for mechanistic studies. This aspect is illustrated by its conversion into the bis‐alkyne complex 6 as an unprecedented representation of a cycloaddition catalyst loaded with two substrates molecules. On the other hand, alkylation of 2 with 1 equivalent of cyclohexylmagnesium bromide furnished the unique iron alkyl species 11 with a 14‐electron count, which has no less than four β‐H atoms but is nevertheless stable at low temperature against β‐hydride elimination. In contrast, the exhaustive alkylation of 1 with cyclohexylmagnesium bromide triggers two consecutive C–H activation reactions mediated by a single iron center. The resulting complex has a diene dihydride character in solution ( 15 ), whereas its structure in the solid state is more consistent with an η³‐allyl iron hydride rendition featuring an additional agostic interaction ( 14 ). Finally, the preparation of the cyclopentadienyl iron complex 25 illustrates how an iron‐mediated C–H activation cascade can be coaxed to induce a stereoselective C C bond formation. The structures of all relevant new iron complexes in the solid state are presented.     

The Thomas Precession and the Transformation to Rotating Frames

The Thomas precession is calculated using three different transformations to the rotating frame. It is shown that for sufficiently large values of v/c, important differences in the predicted angle of precession appear, depending on the transformation used. For smaller values of v/c these differences might be measured by extending the time of observation.     

B(C6F5)3: A Lewis Acid that Brings the Light to the Solid State

The straightforward coordination of the Lewis acid B(C₆F₅)₃ to classical, non‐emitting aldehydes results in solid‐state photoluminescence. Variation of the electronic properties of the carbonyl moieties lead to the modulation of the solid‐state emission colors, covering the entire visible spectrum with quantum yields up to 0.64. Steady‐state spectroscopy in combination with X‐ray diffraction analysis and DFT calculations confirm that intermolecular interactions between the Lewis adducts are responsible for the observed luminescence. Alteration of the latter interactions induces, moreover, remarkable solid‐state phenomena such as piezochromism. The versatility and simplicity of our approach facilitate the future development of solid‐state emitting materials.     

Functionalizations of Mixtures of Regioisomeric Aryllithium Compounds by Selective Trapping with Dichlorozirconocene

The reaction of mixtures of aryllithium regioisomers obtained either by directed lithiation or by Br/Li exchange with substoichiometric amounts of Cp₂ZrCl₂ proceeds with high regioselectivity. The least sterically hindered regioisomeric aryllithium is selectively transmetalated to the corresponding arylzirconium species leaving the more hindered aryllithium ready for various reactions with electrophiles. As an application, these regioselective transmetalations from Li to Zr were used to prepare all three lithiated regioisomers of 1,3‐bis(trifluoromethyl)benzene.     

Stereoselective [3+2] Carbocyclization of Indole‐Derived Imines and Electron‐Rich Alkenes: A Divergent Synthesis of Cyclopenta[b]indole or Tetrahydroquinoline Derivatives

An unprecedented stereoselective [3+2] carbocyclization reaction of indole‐2‐carboxaldehydes, anilines, and electron‐rich alkenes to obtain cyclopenta[b]indoles is disclosed. This pathway is different from the well‐established Povarov reaction: the formal [4+2] cycloaddition involving the same components, which affords tetrahydroquinolines. Moreover, by simply changing the Brønsted acid catalyst, this multicomponent coupling process could be divergently directed towards the conventional Povarov pathway to produce tetrahydroquinolines or to the new pathway (anti‐Povarov) to generate cyclopenta[b]indoles. Supported by computational studies, a stepwise Mannich/Friedel–Crafts cascade is proposed for the new anti‐Povarov reaction, whereas a concerted [4+2] cycloaddition mechanism is proposed for the Povarov reaction.     

Substrate Specificity of Chimeric Enzymes Formed by Interchange of the Catalytic and Specificity Domains of the 5′-Nucleotidase UshA and the 3′-Nucleotidase CpdB

The 5′-nucleotidase UshA and the 3′-nucleotidase CpdB from Escherichia coli are broad-specificity phosphohydrolases with similar two-domain structures. Their N-terminal domains (UshA_Ndom and CpdB_Ndom) contain the catalytic site, and their C-terminal domains (UshA_Cdom and CpdB_Cdom) contain a substrate-binding site responsible for specificity. Both enzymes show only partial overlap in their substrate specificities. So, it was decided to investigate the catalytic behavior of chimeras bearing the UshA catalytic domain and the CpdB specificity domain, or vice versa. UshA_Ndom–CpdB_Cdom and CpdB_Ndom–UshA_Cdom were constructed and tested on substrates specific to UshA (5′-AMP, CDP-choline, UDP-glucose) or to CpdB (3′-AMP), as well as on 2′,3′-cAMP and on the common phosphodiester substrate bis-4-NPP (bis-4-nitrophenylphosphate). The chimeras did show neither 5′-nucleotidase nor 3′-nucleotidase activity. When compared to UshA, UshA_Ndom–CpdB_Cdom conserved high activity on bis-4-NPP, some on CDP-choline and UDP-glucose, and displayed activity on 2′,3′-cAMP. When compared to CpdB, CpdB_Ndom–UshA_Cdom conserved phosphodiesterase activities on 2′,3′-cAMP and bis-4-NPP, and gained activity on the phosphoanhydride CDP-choline. Therefore, the non-nucleotidase activities of UshA and CpdB are not fully dependent on the interplay between domains. The specificity domains may confer the chimeras some of the phosphodiester or phosphoanhydride selectivity displayed when associated with their native partners. Contrarily, the nucleotidase activity of UshA and CpdB depends strictly on the interplay between their native catalytic and specificity domains.     

Optimization of β-1,4-Endoxylanase Production by an Aspergillus niger Strain Growing on Wheat Straw and Application in Xylooligosaccharides Production

Plant biomass constitutes the main source of renewable carbon on the planet. Its valorization has traditionally been focused on the use of cellulose, although hemicellulose is the second most abundant group of polysaccharides on Earth. The main enzymes involved in plant biomass degradation are glycosyl hydrolases, and filamentous fungi are good producers of these enzymes. In this study, a new strain of Aspergillus niger was used for hemicellulase production under solid-state fermentation using wheat straw as single-carbon source. Physicochemical parameters for the production of an endoxylanase were optimized by using a One-Factor-at-a-Time (OFAT) approach and response surface methodology (RSM). Maximum xylanase yield after RSM optimization was increased 3-fold, and 1.41- fold purification was achieved after ultrafiltration and ion-exchange chromatography, with about 6.2% yield. The highest activity of the purified xylanase was observed at 50 °C and pH 6. The enzyme displayed high thermal and pH stability, with more than 90% residual activity between pH 3.0–9.0 and between 30–40 °C, after 24 h of incubation, with half-lives of 30 min at 50 and 60 °C. The enzyme was mostly active against wheat arabinoxylan, and its kinetic parameters were analyzed (K_m = 26.06 mg·mL⁻¹ and V_max = 5.647 U·mg⁻¹). Wheat straw xylan hydrolysis with the purified β-1,4 endoxylanase showed that it was able to release xylooligosaccharides, making it suitable for different applications in food technology.