A possible explanation of countergradient fluxes in homogeneous turbulence

This study addresses the phenomenon of persistent countergradient (PCG) fluxes of momentum and heat (density) as observed in homogeneous turbulence forced by shear and stratification. Countergradient fluxes may occur at large scales when stratification is strong. However, they always occur at small scales, independently of stratification. A conceptional model is introduced to explain PCG fluxes at small scales as the result of the collision of large-scale fluid parcels. The large parcels collide under the driving force of inclined vortex structures (in a shear-dominated flow) or of buoyancy (in a strongly stratified shear flow). This collision model also explains the PCG heat flux in an unsheared stratified flow with zero average momentum flux. It is found that the energy of the small-scale PCG motions is provided (i) by quick transport of kinetic energy from the scales of production to relatively slowly dissipating scales if the flow is shear-driven and (ii) by conversion of available potential energy to kinetic energy at small scales when the flow is stratified. The collision mechanism is an inherent property of the turbulence dynamics. Therefore, the PCG fluxes at small scales reflect a universal character of homogeneous turbulence, and are found over a large range of Reynolds numbers. The Prandtl (or Schmidt) number influences the rate of dissipation of temperature (or density) variance but not the dissipation rate of the velocity variance. In stratified flows, therefore, the number directly affects the strength of the PCG heat flux at small scales. It is found, however, that the PCG momentum flux is also altered slightly when the Prandtl number is large enough to sustain small buoyantly moving parcels after collision.     

On the cube problem of Las Vergnas

We prove a conjecture of Las Vergnas in dimensions d7: The matroid of the d-dimensional cube C ^d has a unique reorientation class. This extends a result of Las Vergnas, Roudneff and Salaün in dimension 4. Moreover, we determine the automorphism group G ^d of the matroid of the d-cube C ^d for arbitrary dimension d, and we discuss its relation to the Coxeter group of C ^d . We introduce matroid facets of the matroid of the d-cube in order to evaluate the order of G ^d . These matroid facets turn out to be arbitrary pairs of parallel subfacets of the cube. We show that the Euclidean automorphism group W ^d is a proper subgroup of the group G ^d of all matroid symmetries of the d-cube by describing genuine matroid symmetries for each Euclidean facet. A main theorem asserts that any one of these matroid symmetries together with the Euclidean Coxeter symmetries generate the full automorphism group G ^d . For the proof of Las Vergnas' conjecture we use essentially these symmetry results together with the fact that the reorientation class of an oriented matroid is determined by the labeled lower rank contractions of the oriented matroid. We also describe the Folkman-Lawrence representation of the vertex figure of the d-cube and a contraction of it. Finally, we apply our method of proof to show a result of Las Vergnas, Roudneff, and Salaün that the matroid of the 24-cell has a unique reorientation class, too.     

Crystal and molecular structure of the cycloaddition product between maleic anhydride,cyclopentadiene, and 1,2-bis(dibromomethyl)benzene as DMF solvate (1∶2)

Crystal structure determination reveals that the unknown cycloaddition product between maleic anhydride, cyclopentadiene, and 1,2-bis(dibromomethyl)benzene has a nona-cyclic centrosymmetric structure. The compound was studied as DMF solvate (12). There is no significant intermolecular interaction between the title molecule and the DMF. Packing is in layers for both molecular species. A possible mechanism of formation of the title compound is discussed.     

Effect of temperature on the surface free energy of amorphous carbon films

Diamond-like carbon (DLC) and tetrahedral amorphous carbon (ta-C) have attracted much attention recently for biomedical and antifouling applications due to their excellent biocompatibility and inherent nonstick properties. It has been demonstrated that the solid surface free energy is a dominant factor in cellular or fouling adhesion. However, few data for the surface free energy of DLC and ta-C coatings at temperatures in the range 37-95 degrees C are available. In this study DLC and ta-C coatings on stainless steel 304 sheets were prepared using an unbalanced magnetron sputtering system and a filtered cathodic vacuum arc system, respectively. The contact angles of water, diiodomethane and ethylene glycol on the coated surfaces at temperatures in the range 20-95 degrees C were measured using a Dataphysics OCA-20 contact angle analyzer. The surface free energy of the coatings and their components (e.g., dispersion, polar or acid/base portions) were calculated using various methods. The experimental results showed that the total surface free energy and dispersive surface free energy of the ta-C coatings, DLC coatings, stainless steel 304 and titanium decreased with increasing surface temperature, while the acid-base SFE component increased with increasing temperature.     

carbon-carbon bond formation between 1,3-dienes and electron deficient alkenes

1,3-Dienes and electron deficient alkenes are coupled in a one pot carbon-carbon bond formation reaction under mild conditions.     

Säurekatalysierte Dienon-Phenol-Umlagerungen von 6-Propargyl-6-methyl-cyclohexa-2,4-dien-1-onen; ladungskontrollierte,aromatische [1s, 2s]- und [3s, 4s]-sigmatropische Reaktionen

The acid catalysed dienone-phenol rearrangement of methyl substituted o-propargyl-cyclohexadienones (scheme 3) was investigated. The rearrangements were carried out in acetic anhydride containing about 1⁰/₀₀ sulfuric acid. Under these conditions acetoxy benzenium ions are formed as intermediates. These then undergo charge-controlled [3s, 4s]- and [1s, 2s]-sigmatropic rearrangements. Thus, the [3s, 4s]-process leads to the formation of the corresponding allenyl-phenol acetates ( 19 , 21 , 23 , 25 , 28 , 30 ) whereas the [1s, 2s]-process yields propargyl-phenol acetates ( 20 , 22 , 24 , 26 , 29 ), respectively (cf. scheme 4).