A Reader’s Comment on: “Hysteresis Model of Unconscious-Conscious Interconnection: Exploring Dynamics on m-Adic Trees”

p-Adic Numbers, Ultrametric Analysis and Applications - This comment is aimed to point out that the recent work due to H. Kim, J-Y. Moon, G. A. Mashour and U. Lee ([22]), in which the clinical and...     

Analog of Formula of Total Probability for Quantum Observables Represented by Positive Operator Valued Measures

We represent Born’s rule as an analog of the formula of total probability (FTP): the classical formula is perturbed by an additive interference term. In this note we consider practically the most general case: generalized quantum observables given by positive operator valued measures and measurement feedback on states described by atomic instruments. This representation of Born’s rule clarifies the probabilistic structure of quantum mechanics (QM). The probabilistic counterpart of QM can be treated as the probability update machinery based on the special generalization of classical FTP. This is the essence of the Växjö interpretation of QM: statistical realist contextual and local interpretation. We analyze the origin of the additional interference term in quantum FTP by considering the contextual structure of the two slit experiment which was emphasized by R. Feynman.     

p-Adic Analogue of the Wave Equation

In this paper, a p-adic analogue of the wave equation with Lipschitz source is considered. Since it is hard to arrive the solution of the problem, we propose a regularized method to solve the problem from a modified p-adic integral equation. Moreover, we give an iterative scheme for numerical computation of the regularlized solution.

     

View of bunching and antibunching from the standpoint of classical signals

The similarity between classical wave mechanics and quantum mechanics was noted in the works of De Broglie, Schr?dinger, ??late?? Einstein, Lamb, Lande, Mandel, Marshall, Santos, Boyer, and many others. We present a new wave model of quantum mechanics, the so-called prequantum classical statistical field theory, in which an analogy between some quantum phenomena and the classical theory of random fields is investigated. Quantum systems are interpreted as symbolic representations of such fields (not only for photons, cf. Lande and Lamb, but even for massive particles). All quantum averages and correlations (including composite systems in entangled states) can be represented as averages and correlations for classical random fields. We use the prequantum classical statistical field theory to obtain bunching and antibunching in the framework of classical signal theory. We note that antibunching at least is typically considered an essentially quantum (nonclassical) phenomenon.     

Application of p-Adic Wavelets to Model Reaction–Diffusion Dynamics in Random Porous Media

Fourier and more generally wavelet analysis over the fields of p-adic numbers are widely used in physics, biology and cognitive science, and recently in geophysics. In this note we present a model of the reaction–diffusion dynamics in random porous media, e.g., flow of fluid (oil, water or emulsion) in a a complex network of pores with known topology. Anomalous diffusion in the model is represented by the system of two equations of reaction–diffusion type, for the part of fluid not bound to solid’s interface (e.g., free oil) and for the part bound to solid’s interface (e.g., solids–bound oil). Our model is based on the p-adic (treelike) representation of pore-networks. We present the system of two p-adic reaction–diffusion equations describing propagation of fluid in networks of pores in random media and find its stationary solutions by using theory of p-adic wavelets. The use of p-adic wavelets (generalizing classical wavelet theory) gives a possibility to find the stationary solution in the analytic form which is typically impossible for anomalous diffusion in the standard representation based on the real numbers.     

Vladimir Sergeevich Anashin

On the occasion of the 60th birthday of Professor Vladimir Sergeevich Anashin, we present a review of his significant scientific research and related activities.     

A Regularization of Quantum Field Hamiltonians with the Aid of p–adic Numbers

Gaussian distributions on infinite-dimensional p-adic spaces are introduced and the corresponding L₂-spaces of p-adic-valued square integrable functions are constructed. Representations of the infinite-dimensional Weyl group are realized in p-adic L₂-spaces. There is a formal analogy with the usual Segal representation. But there is also a large topological difference: parameters of the p-adic infinite-dimensional Weyl group are defined only on some balls (these balls are additive subgroups). p-adic Hilbert space representations of quantum Hamiltonians for systems with an infinite number of degrees of freedom are constructed. Many Hamiltonians with potentials which are too singular to exist as functions over reals are realized as bounded symmetric operators in L₂-spaces with respect to a p-adic Gaussian distribution.     

<Emphasis Type="Italic">p</Emphasis>-Adic mathematical physics and B. Dragovich research

We present a brief review of some parts of p-adic mathematical physics related to the scientific work of Branko Dragovich on the occasion of his 70th birthday.     

The Present Situation in Quantum Theory and its Merging with General Relativity

We discuss the problems of quantum theory (QT) complicating its merging with general relativity (GR). QT is treated as a general theory of micro-phenomena—a bunch of models. Quantum mechanics (QM) and quantum field theory (QFT) are the most widely known (but, e.g., Bohmian mechanics is also a part of QT). The basic problems of QM and QFT are considered in interrelation. For QM, we stress its nonrelativistic character and the presence of spooky action at a distance. For QFT, we highlight the old problem of infinities. And this is the main point of the paper: it is meaningless to try to unify QFT so heavily suffering of infinities with GR. We also highlight difficulties of the QFT-treatment of entanglement. We compare the QFT and QM based measurement theories by presenting both theoretical and experimental viewpoints. Then we discuss two basic mathematical constraints of both QM and QFT, namely, the use of real (and, hence, complex) numbers and the Hilbert state space. We briefly present non-archimedean and non-hilbertian approaches to QT and their consequences. Finally, we claim that, in spite of the Bell theorem, it is still possible to treat quantum phenomena on the basis of a classical-like causal theory. We present a random field model generating the QM and QFT formalisms. This emergence viewpoint can serve as the basis for unification of novel QT (may be totally different from presently powerful QM and QFT) and GR. (It may happen that the latter would also be revolutionary modified.)