Characterization of manganese(V)-oxo polyoxometalate intermediates and their properties in oxygen-transfer reactions

A manganese(III)-substituted polyoxometalate, [alpha2-P2MnIII(L)W17O61]7- (P2W17MnIII), was studied as an oxidation catalyst using iodopentafluorobenzene bis(tifluoroacetate) (F5PhI(TFAc)2) as a monooxygen donor. Pink P2W17MnIII turns green upon addition of F5PhI(TFAc)2. The 19F NMR spectrum of F5PhI(TFAc)2 with excess P2W17MnIII at -50 degrees C showed the formation of an intermediate attributed to P2W17MnIII-F5PhI(TFAc)2 that disappeared upon warming. The 31P NMR spectra of P2W17MnIII with excess F5PhI(TFAc)2 at -50 and -20 degrees C showed a pair of narrow peaks attributed to a diamagnetic, singlet manganese(V)-oxo species, P2W17MnV=O. An additional broad peak at -10.6 ppm was attributed to both the P2W17MnIII-F5PhI(TFAc)2 complex and a paramagnetic, triplet manganese(V)-oxo species. The electronic structure and reactivity of P2W17MnV=O were modeled by DFT calculations using the analogous Keggin compound, [PMnV=OW11O39]4-. Calculations with a pure functional, UBLYP, showed singlet and triplet ground states of similar energy. Further calculations using both the UBLYP and UB3LYP functionals for epoxidation and hydroxylation of propene showed lowest lying triplet transition states for both transformations, while singlet and quintet transition states were of higher energy. The calculations especially after corrections for the solvent effect indicate that [PMnV=OW11O39]4- should be highly reactive, even more reactive than analogous MnV=O porphyrin species. Kinetic measurements of the reaction of P2W17MnV=O with 1-octene indicated, however, that P2W17MnV=O was less reactive than a MnV=O porphyrin. The experimental enthalpy of activation confirmed that the energy barrier for epoxidation is low, but the highly negative entropy of activation leads to a high free energy of activation. This result originates in our view from the strong solvation of the highly charged polyoxometalate by the polar solvent used and adventitious water. The higher negative charge of the polyoxometalate in the transition versus ground state leads to electrostriction of the solvent molecules and to a loss of degrees of freedom, resulting in a highly negative entropy of activation and slower reactions.     

An efficient proton-coupled electron-transfer process during oxidation of ferulic acid by horseradish peroxidase: coming full cycle

Quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics calculations were utilized to study the process of oxidation of a native substrate (ferulic acid) by the active species of horseradish peroxidase (Dunford, H. B. Heme Peroxidases; Wiley-VCH: New York, 1999), Compound I and Compound II, and the manner by which the enzyme returns to its resting state. The results match experimental findings and reveal additional novel features. The calculations demonstrate that both oxidation processes are initiated by a proton-coupled electron-transfer (PCET) step, in which the active species of the enzyme participate only as electron-transfer partners, while the entire proton-transfer event is being relayed from the substrate to and from the His42 residue by a water molecule (W402). The reason for the observed (Henriksen, A; Smith, A. T.; Gajhede, M. J. Biol. Chem. 1999, 274, 35005-35011) similar reactivities of Compound I and Compound II toward ferulic acid is that the reactive isomer of Compound II is the, hitherto unobserved, Por(*)(+)Fe(III)OH isomer that resembles Compound I. The PCET mechanism reveals that His42 and W402 are crucial moieties and they determine the function of the HRP enzyme and account for its ability to perform substrate oxidation (Poulos, T. L. Peroxidases and Cytochrome P450. In The Porphyrin Handbook; Kadish, K. M., Smith, K. M., Guilard, R., Eds.; Academic Press: New York, 2000; Vol. 4, pp 189). In view of the results, the possibility of manipulating substrate oxidation by magnetic fields is an intriguing possibility.     

How Can Theory Predict the Selectivity of Palladium‐Catalyzed Cross‐Coupling of Pristine Aromatic Molecules?

The new approach for palladium‐catalyzed cross‐coupling of two non‐activated aromatic compounds (D. R. Stuart, K. Fagnou, Science 2007 , 316, 1172) was studied theoretically. The energetic span model (S. Kozuch, S. Shaik, Acc. Chem. Res. 2011 , 44, 101, and references therein) was employed to analyze the kinetic behavior of the catalytic cycle. The computed energy profile, combined with the energetic span model, accounts for the experimental selectivity, which favors the hetero‐coupling of benzene with indole. This selectivity is driven by a fine balance of the entropic contributions and the high ratio of concentrations used for benzene over indole. This analysis may allow future theoretical predictions of how different aromatic compounds can be effectively coupled.     

Quantum mechanical/molecular mechanical study on the mechanisms of compound I formation in the catalytic cycle of chloroperoxidase: an overview on heme enzymes

The formation of Compound I (Cpd I), the active species of the enzyme chloroperoxidase (CPO), was studied using QM/MM calculation. Starting from the substrate complex with hydrogen peroxide, FeIII-HOOH, we examined two alternative mechanisms on the three lowest spin-state surfaces. The calculations showed that the preferred pathway involves heterolytic O-O cleavage that proceeds via the iron hydroperoxide species, i.e., Compound 0 (Cpd 0), on the doublet-state surface. This process is effectively concerted, with a barrier of 12.4 kcal/mol, and is catalyzed by protonation of the distal OH group of Cpd 0. By comparison, the path that involves a direct O-O cleavage from FeIII-HOOH is less favored. A proton coupled electron transfer (PCET) feature was found to play an important role in the mechanism nascent from Cpd 0. Initially, the O-O cleavage progresses in a homolytic sense, but as soon as the proton is transferred to the distal OH, it triggers an electron transfer from the heme-oxo moiety to form water and Cpd I. This study enables us to generalize the mechanisms of O-O activation, elucidated so far by QM/MM calculations, for other heme enzymes, e.g., cytochrome P450cam, horseradish peroxidase (HRP), nitric oxide synthase (NOS), and heme oxygenase (HO). Much like for CPO, in the cases of P450 and HRP, the PCET lowers the barrier below the purely homolytic cleavage alternative (in our case, the homolytic mechanism is calculated directly from FeIII-HOOH). By contrast, the absence of PCET in HO, along with the robust water cluster, prefers a homolytic cleavage mechanism.     

Myth and Reality in the Attitude toward Valence‐Bond (VB) Theory: Are Its ‘Failures’ Real?

According to common wisdom propagated in textbooks and papers, valence‐bond (VB) theory fails and makes predictions in contradiction with experiment. Four iconic ‘failures’ are: a) the wrong prediction of the ground state of the O₂ molecule, b) the failure to predict the properties of cyclobutadiene (CBD) viz. those of benzene, c) the failure to predict the aromaticity/anti‐aromaticity of molecular ions like C₅H and C₅H , C₃H and C₃H , C₇H and C₇H , etc; and d) the failure to predict that, e.g., CH₄ has two different ionization potentials. This paper analyzes the origins of these ‘failures’ and shows that two of them (stated in a and d) are myths of unclear origins, while the other two originate in misuse of an oversimplified version of VB theory, i.e., simple resonance theory that merely enumerate resonance structures. It is demonstrated that, in each case, a properly used VB theory at a simple and portable level leads to correct predictions, as successful as those made by use of molecular‐orbital (MO) theory. This notion of VB ‘failure’, which is traced back to the VB‐MO rivalry, in the early days of quantum chemistry, should now be considered obsolete, unwarranted, and counterproductive. A modern chemist should know that there are two ways of describing electronic structure, which are not two contrasting theories, but rather two representations or two guises of the same reality. Their capabilities and insights into chemical problems are complementary, and the exclusion of any one of them undermines the intellectual heritage of chemistry.     

A two-state reactivity rationale for counterintuitive axial ligand effects on the C-H activation reactivity of nonheme FeIV=O oxidants

This paper addresses the observation of counterintuitive reactivity patterns of iron-oxo reagents, TMC(L)FeO(2+,1+); L=CH(3)CN, CF(3)CO(2) (-), N(3) (-), and SR(-), in O-transfer to phosphines versus H-abstraction from, for example, 1,4-cyclohexadiene. Experiments show that O-transfer reactivity correlates with the electrophilicity of the oxidant, but H-abstraction reactivity follows an opposite trend. DFT/B3 LYP calculations reveal that two-state reactivity (TSR) serves as a compelling rationale for these trends, whereby all reactions involve two adjacent spin-states of the iron(IV)-oxo species, triplet and quintet. The ground state triplet surface has high barriers, whereas the excited state quintet surface features lower ones. The barriers, on any single surface, are found to increase as the electrophilicity of TMC(L)FeO(2+,1+) decreases. Thus, the counterintuitive behavior of the H-abstraction reactions cannot be explained by considering the reactivity of only a single spin state but can be rationalized by a TSR model in which the reactions proceed on the two surfaces. Two TSR models are outlined: one is traditional involving a variable transmission coefficient for crossover from triplet to quintet, followed by quintet-state reactions; the other considers the net barrier as a blend of the triplet and quintet barriers. The blending coefficient (x), which estimates the triplet participation, increases as the quintet-triplet energy gap of the TMC(L)FeO(2+,1+) reagent increases, in the following order of L: CH(3)CN > CF(3)CO(2) (-) > N(3) (-) > SR(-). The calculated barriers predict the dichotomic experimental trends and the counterintuitive behavior of the H-abstraction series. The TSR approaches make a variety of testable predictions.     

Charge-shift bonding--a class of electron-pair bonds that emerges from valence bond theory and is supported by the electron localization function approach

This paper deals with a central paradigm of chemistry, the electron-pair bond. Valence bond (VB) theory and electron-localization function (ELF) calculations of 21 single bonds demonstrate that along the two classical bond families of covalent and ionic bonds, there exists a class of charge-shift bonds (CS bonds) in which the fluctuation of the electron pair density plays a dominant role. In VB theory, CS bonding manifests by way of a large covalent-ionic resonance energy, RE(CS), and in ELF by a depleted basin population with large variances (fluctuations). CS bonding is shown to be a fundamental mechanism that is necessary to satisfy the equilibrium condition, namely the virial ratio of the kinetic and potential energy contributions to the bond energy. The paper defines the atomic propensity and territory for CS bonding: Atoms (fragments) that are prone to CS bonding are compact electronegative and/or lone-pair-rich species. As such, the territory of CS bonding transcends considerations of static charge distribution, and involves: a) homopolar bonds of heteroatoms with zero static ionicity, b) heteropolar sigma and pi bonds of the electronegative and/or electron-pair-rich elements among themselves and to other atoms (e.g., the higher metalloids, Si, Ge, Sn, etc), c) all hypercoordinate molecules. Several experimental manifestations of charge-shift bonding are discussed, such as depleted bonding density, the rarity of ionic chemistry of silicon in condensed phases, and the high barriers of halogen-transfer reactions as compared to hydrogen-transfers.