Comparative Photophysical Study of Disulfonated Aluminum Phthalocyanine in Unilamellar Vesicles and Leukemic K562 Cells

Abstract— The photophysical properties of cis -disulfonated aluminum phthalocyanine (AlPcS₂) in unilamellar vesicles (liposomes) of DL-a-dipalmitoyl-phosphatidylcholine have been measured. Both the fluorescence and triplet quantum yields decreased with increasing sensitizer concentration. The time-resolved fluorescence decays, analyzed by both the sum of exponentials and decay time distribution analyses, are compared with those reported for AlPcS₂ in leukemic K562 cells. Information on the pho-todynamic transport and localization mechanism has been obtained by drawing correlations between the two systems, indicating active transport of the phthalocyanine into tumor cells involving lysosomal accumulation.     

DEUSS: a perdeuterated poly(oxyethylene)-based resin for improving HRMAS NMR studies of solid-supported molecules

A novel resin called DEUSS (perdeuterated poly(oxyethylene)-based solid support) has been prepared by anionic polymerization of deuterated [D4]ethylene oxide, followed by cross-linking with deuterated epichlorohydrin. DEUSS can be suspended in a wide range of solvents including organic and aqueous solutions, in which it displays a high swelling capacity. As measured by proton HRMAS of the swollen polymer, the signal intensity of the oxyethylene protons is reduced by a factor of 110 relative to the corresponding nondeuterated poly(oxyethylene)poly(oxypropylene) (POEPOP) resin, thus facilitating detailed HRMAS NMR studies of covalently linked molecules. This 1H NMR invisible matrix was used for the solid-phase synthesis of peptides, oligoureas, and a series of amides as well as their characterization by HRMAS NMR spectroscopy. On-bead NMR spectra of high quality and with resolution comparable to that of liquid samples were obtained and readily interpreted. The complete absence of the parasite resin signals will be of great advantage, for example, for the optimization of multistep solid-phase stereoselective reactions, and for the conformational study of resin-bound molecules in a large variety of solvents.     

Solvating,manipulating, damaging,and repairing DNA in a computer

This work highlights four different topics in modeling of DNA: (i) the importance of water and ions together with the structure and function of DNA; the hydration structure around the ions appears to be the determining factor in the ion coordination to DNA, as demonstrated in the results of our MD simulations; (ii) how MD simulations can be used to simulate single molecule manipulation experiments as a complement to reveal the structural dynamics of the studied biomolecules; (iii) how damaged DNA can be studied in computer simulations; and (iv) how repair of damaged DNA can be studied theoretically. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Int J Quantum Chem, 2007     

Element neighbourhoods in twofold triple systems

The method of differences is used to establish that every 2-regular multigraph onv– 10,2 (mod 3) points occurs as the neighbourhood graph of an element in a twofold triple system of orderv, with two exceptions: C₂C₃and C₃C₃.Dedicated to Professor Hanfried Lenz on the occasion of his seventieth birthday     

Unramified forcing preserving the law of double negation

Shoenfield's unramified version of Cohen's forcing is defined in two stages: one which does not preserve double negation and the other which modifies the former so as to preserve double negation. Here we express the unramified forcing, which preserves double negation, in a single stage. Surprisingly enough, the corresponding definition of forcing for equality acquires a rather simple form. In [2] forcing ∥- is expressed in terms of strong forcing \( \Vdash * \) viap∥-Q iffp \( \Vdash * \) ¬ ¬Q for every formulaQ ofZF set theory and every elementp of a partially ordered set (P, ≦). In its turn,p \( \Vdash * \) Q is defined by the following five clauses: (1) $$p \Vdash * a \in biff(\exists c)(\exists q \geqq p)((c,q) \in b \wedge p \Vdash * a = c)$$ (2) $$\begin{gathered} p \Vdash * a \ne biff(\exists c)(\exists q \geqq p)(((c,q) \in a \wedge p \Vdash * c \notin b) \hfill \\ ((c,q) \in b \wedge p \Vdash * c \notin a)) \hfill \\ \end{gathered} $$ (3) $$p \Vdash * \neg Qiff(\forall q)(q \leqq p \to \neg (q \Vdash * Q))$$ (4) $$p \Vdash * (Q \vee S)iff(p \Vdash * Q) \vee (p \Vdash * S)$$ (5) $$p \Vdash * (\exists x)Q(x)iff(\exists b)(p \Vdash * Q(b))$$ .