Preconcentration and atomic spectrometric determination of rare earth elements (REEs) in natural water samples by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry

The usage of a variety of sorbents has been shown as promising matrix removal/preconcentration strategies for the determination of rare earth elements (REEs) in various natural water samples by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry (ICP-AES). The sorption efficiency of various zeolites (clinoptilolite, mordenite, zeolite Y, zeolite Beta), ion-exchangers (Amberlite CG-120, Amberlite IR-120, Rexyn 101, Dowex 50W X18) and chelating resins (Muromac, Chelex 100, Amberlite IRC-718) towards REEs was investigated in terms of solution pH, shaking time and sorbent amount. The results have shown that most of the materials can take up REEs at a wide pH range. The experiments were continued with clinoptilolite, zeolite Y and Chelex 100 and it was demonstrated that all three materials displayed very fast kinetics for REE sorption (higher than 96% in 1 min). Desorption from the sorbents was realized with 2.0 M HNO₃ for clinoptilolite and 0.1 M HNO₃ for zeolite Y and Chelex 100. Only the lower concentration range (0.01-2.0 mg l⁻¹) of matrix-matched standards were used in quantitation although the calibration graphs were linear at least up to 10.0 mg l⁻¹ for all REEs studied. The limit of detection (3 s) without preconcentration was 0.1, 1.0, and 0.2 μg l⁻¹ for Eu, La, and Yb, respectively. The validity of the method with the selected sorbents was checked through spike recovery experiments.     

Unraveling σ and π Effects on Magnetic Anisotropy in cis‐NiA4B2 Complexes: Magnetization,HF‐HFEPR Studies,First‐Principles Calculations,and Orbital Modeling

By using complementary experimental techniques and first‐principles theoretical calculations, magnetic anisotropy in a series of five hexacoordinated nickel(II) complexes possessing a symmetry close to C_2v, has been investigated. Four complexes have the general formula [Ni(bpy)X₂]ⁿ⁺ (bpy=2,2′‐bipyridine; X₂=bpy ( 1 ), (NCS^?)₂ ( 2 ), C₂O₄^2? ( 3 ), NO₃^? ( 4 )). In the fifth complex, [Ni(HIM₂‐py)₂(NO₃)]⁺ ( 5 ; HIM₂‐py=2‐(2‐pyridyl)‐4,4,5,5‐tetramethyl‐4,5‐dihydro‐1H‐imidazolyl‐1‐hydroxy), which was reported previously, the two bpy bidentate ligands were replaced by HIM₂‐py. Analysis of the high‐field, high‐frequency electronic paramagnetic resonance (HF‐HFEPR) spectra and magnetization data leads to the determination of the spin Hamiltonian parameters. The D parameter, corresponding to the axial magnetic anisotropy, was negative (Ising type) for the five compounds and ranged from ?1 to ?10 cm^?1. First‐principles SO‐CASPT2 calculations have been performed to estimate these parameters and rationalize the experimental values. From calculations, the easy axis of magnetization is in two different directions for complexes 2 and 3 , on one hand, and 4 and 5 , on the other hand. A new method is proposed to calculate the g tensor for systems with S=1. The spin Hamiltonian parameters (D (axial), E (rhombic), and g_i) are rationalized in terms of ordering of the 3 d orbitals. According to this orbital model, it can be shown that 1) the large magnetic anisotropy of 4 and 5 arises from splitting of the e_g‐like orbitals and is due to the difference in the σ‐donor strength of NO₃^? and bpy or HIM₂‐py, whereas the difference in anisotropy between the two compounds is due to splitting of the t_2g‐like orbitals; and 2) the anisotropy of complexes 1 – 3 arises from the small splitting of the t_2g‐like orbitals. The direction of the anisotropy axis can be rationalized by the proposed orbital model.     

Mixed ligand palladium(II) and platinum(II) complexes of tertiary diphosphines and benz-1,3-imidazoline-2-thione,benz-1,3-oxazoline-2-thione or benz-1,3-thiazoline-2-thione

Palladium(II) and platinum(II) complexes containing the mixed ligands tertiary diphosphines Ph₂P(CH₂) _n PPh₂, (n = 1–4) and benz-1,3-imidazoline-2-thione, benz-1,3-oxazoline-2-thione or benz-1,3-thiazoline-2-thione have been prepared and characterized by elemental analysis, magnetic susceptibility, molar conductance and i.r. spectral data. ³¹P–{¹H}-n.m.r. data have been applied to characterize the produced linkage isomers.     

Imaging the Magnetic Reversal of Isolated and Organized Molecular‐Based Nanoparticles using Magnetic Force Microscopy

In the race towards miniaturization in nanoelectronics, magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) have emerged as potential candidates for their integration in ultrahigh‐density recording media. Molecular‐based materials open the possibility to design new tailor‐made MNPs with variable composition and sizes, which benefit from the intrinsic properties of these materials. Before their implementation in real devices is reached, a precise organization on surfaces and a reliable characterization and manipulation of their individual magnetic behavior are required. In this paper, it is demonstrated how molecular‐based MNPs are accurately organized on surfaces and how the magnetic properties of the individual MNPs are detected and tuned by means of low‐temperature magnetic force microscopy (LT‐MFM) with variable magnetic field. The magnetization reversal on isolated and organized MNPs is investigated; in addition, the temperature dependence of their magnetic response is evaluated.     

Synthesis of novel heterobimetallic complexes of platinum(II) bridged by the mixed phosphine-phosphine oxide ligands Ph2P(CH2)2P(O)Ph2

Summary The mixed phosphine-phosphine oxides Ph₂P(CH₂)_n-P(O)Ph₂ (n = 1 or 2) react with K₂PtCl₄ to give cis-{PtCl₂- ¹-Ph₂P(CH₂) _n P(O)Ph₂]₂}. Treatment of the latter (n = 2) with transition metal chlorides MCl₂·nH₂O, or with Me₂SnCl₂, SnCl₄·5H₂O, Th(NO₃)₄·xH₂O or UO₂(NO₃)₂· 6H₂O, gives novel heterobimetallic complexes identified as cis-{PtCl₂[-Ph₂P(CH₂)₂P(O)Ph₂]₂MX₂}·nH₂O. Attempts to prepare similar heterobimetallic complexes using the starting complexes {PtX₂[ ¹-Ph₂PCH₂P(O)-Ph₂]₂} (X = C1), cis- or CN, trans-] were unsuccessful. Possible reasons for this are discussed.     

Studies on platinum(II) and palladium(II) complexes of some N,N′-disubstituted thiourea derivatives

Summary A series of new Pt^II and Pd^II complexes of N,N-disubstituted thiourea derivatives of general formulae [MLCl₂]₂, [ML₂Cl₂] and [ML₄]Cl₂ have been prepared and characterised by physicochemical and spectroscopic methods. The reaction of these ligands with [M(DMSO)₂Cl₂], M = Pt, cis- or Pd, trans-, in CHCl₃ and EtOH at ambient temperature or under reflux, is described.     

Assessing the exchange coupling in binuclear lanthanide(iii) complexes and the slow relaxation of the magnetization in the antiferromagnetically coupled Dy2 derivative

We report here the synthesis and the investigation of the magnetic properties of a series of binuclear lanthanide complexes belonging to the metallacrown family. The isostructural complexes have a core structure with the general formula [Ga₄Ln₂(shi^3–)₄(Hshi^2–)₂(H₂shi^–)₂(C₅H₅N)₄(CH₃OH)_x(H₂O)_x]·xC₅H₅N·xCH₃OH·xH₂O (where H₃shi = salicylhydroxamic acid and Ln = Gd^III1; Tb^III2; Dy^III3; Er^III4; Y^III5; Y^III_0.9Dy^III_0.16). Apart from the Er-containing complex, all complexes exhibit an antiferromagnetic exchange coupling leading to a diamagnetic ground state. Magnetic studies, below 2 K, on a single crystal of 3 using a micro-squid array reveal an opening of the magnetic hysteresis cycle at zero field. The dynamic susceptibility studies of 3 and of the diluted DyY 6 complexes reveal the presence of two relaxation processes for 3 that are due to the excited ferromagnetic state and to the uncoupled Dy^III ions. The antiferromagnetic coupling in 3 was shown to be mainly due to an exchange mechanism, which accounts for about 2/3 of the energy gap between the antiferro- and the ferromagnetic states. The overlap integrals between the Natural Spin Orbitals (NSOs) of the mononuclear fragments, which are related to the magnitude of the antiferromagnetic exchange, are one order of magnitude larger for the Dy₂ than for the Er₂ complex.     

Tailoring the Structure of Two‐Dimensional Self‐Assembled Nanoarchitectures Based on NiII–Salen Building Blocks

The synthesis of a series of Ni^II–salen‐based complexes with the general formula of [Ni(H₂L)] (H₄L=R²‐N,N′‐bis[R¹‐5‐(4′‐benzoic acid)salicylidene]; H₄L1: R²=2,3‐diamino‐2,3‐dimethylbutane and R¹=H; H₄L2: R²=1,2‐diaminoethane and R¹=tert‐butyl and H₄L3: R²=1,2‐diaminobenzene and R¹=tert‐butyl) is presented. Their electronic structure and self‐assembly was studied. The organic ligands of the salen complexes are functionalized with peripheral carboxylic groups for driving molecular self‐assembly through hydrogen bonding. In addition, other substituents, that is, tert‐butyl and diamine bridges (2,3‐diamino‐2,3‐dimethylbutane, 1,2‐diaminobenzene or 1,2‐diaminoethane), were used to tune the two‐dimensional (2D) packing of these building blocks. Density functional theory (DFT) calculations reveal that the spatial distribution of the LUMOs is affected by these substituents, in contrast with the HOMOs, which remain unchanged. Scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) shows that the three complexes self‐assemble into three different 2D nanoarchitectures at the solid–liquid interface on graphite. Two structures are porous and one is close‐packed. These structures are stabilized by hydrogen bonds in one dimension, while the 2D interaction is governed by van der Waals forces and is tuned by the nature of the substituents, as confirmed by theoretical calculations. As expected, the total dipolar moment is minimized     

Magnetic Bistability of Individual Single‐Molecule Magnets Grafted on Single‐Wall Carbon Nanotubes

A POM to remember : Hexanuclear Fe^III polyoxometalate (POM) single‐molecule magnets (see structure) can be noncovalently assembled on the surface of single‐wall carbon nanotubes. Complementary characterization techniques (see TEM image and magnetic hysteresis loops) demonstrate the integrity and bistability of the individual molecules, which could be used to construct single‐molecule memory devices.

     

Syntheses,structural analyses,and magneto-structural correlations of three polymeric Fe(II) complexes with azide ligand

Three new metal-organic polymeric complexes, [Fe(N(3))(2)(bpp)(2)] (1), [Fe(N(3))(2)(bpe)] (2), and [Fe(N(3))(2)(phen)] (3) [bpp = (1,3-bis(4-pyridyl)-propane), bpe = (1,2-bis(4-pyridyl)-ethane), phen = 1,10-phenanthroline], have been synthesized and characterized by single-crystal X-ray diffraction studies and low-temperature magnetic measurements in the range 300-2 K. Complexes 1 and 2 crystallize in the monoclinic system, space group C2/c, with the following cell parameters: a = 19.355(4) A, b = 7.076(2) A, c = 22.549(4) A, beta = 119.50(3) degrees, Z = 4, and a = 10.007(14) A, b = 13.789(18) A, c = 10.377(14) A, beta = 103.50(1) degrees, Z = 4, respectively. Complex 3 crystallizes in the triclinic system, space group P(-)1, with a = 7.155(12) A, b = 10.066(14) A, c = 10.508(14) A, alpha = 109.57(1) degrees, beta = 104.57(1) degrees, gamma = 105.10(1) degrees, and Z = 2. All coordination polymers exhibit octahedral Fe(II) nodes. The structural determination of 1 reveals a parallel interpenetrated structure of 2D layers of (4,4) topology, formed by Fe(II) nodes linked through bpp ligands, while mono-coordinated azide anions are pendant from the corrugated sheet. Complex 2 has a 2D arrangement constructed through 1D double end-to-end azide bridged iron(II) chains interconnected through bpe ligands. Complex 3 shows a polymeric arrangement where the metal ions are interlinked through pairs of end-on and end-to-end azide ligands exhibiting a zigzag arrangement of metals (Fe-Fe-Fe angle of 111.18 degrees) and an intermetallic separation of 3.347 A (through the EO azide) and of 5.229 A (EE azide). Variable-temperature magnetic susceptibility data suggest that there is no magnetic interaction between the metal centers in 1, whereas in 2 there is an antiferromagnetic interaction through the end-to-end azide bridge. Complex 3 shows ferro- as well as anti-ferromagnetic interactions between the metal centers generated through the alternating end-on and end-to-end azide bridges. Complex 1 has been modeled using the D parameter (considering distorted octahedral Fe(II) geometry and with any possible J value equal to zero) and complex 2 has been modeled as a one-dimensional system with classical and/or quantum spin where we have used two possible full diagonalization processes: without and with the D parameter, considering the important distortions of the Fe(II) ions. For complex 3, the alternating coupling model impedes a mathematical solution for the modeling as classical spins. With quantum spin, the modeling has been made as in 2.