Third-order nonlinear optical properties of complexes with MM triple and quadruple bonds (M = Mo, W) at 1064 nm by degenerate four-wave mixing

Measurements of the third-order nonlinear optical responses of solutions of the metal-metal multiply bonded complexes Mo(2)(OPr(i))(6), W(2)(OBu(t))(6), M(2)(NMe(2))(6), M(2)(O(2)CBu(t))(4), and M(2)Cl(4)(PMe(3))(4) (M = Mo, W), using picosecond degenerate four-wave mixing at 1064 nm, are reported. These complexes display only very small instantaneous electronic polarizations when excited with cross-polarized beams. When the excitation beams are similarly polarized, a significant third-order optical response is detected, which is attributable to the formation of bulk thermal excitation gratings. Time-dependent measurements support this view.     

Gravity and the frame field

The covariant derivative of a single massive fermion field on a Riemannian manifold is defined. The standard method of defining free bosonic Lagrangians from the fermion covariant derivative does not give the usual Lagrangian density for the free gravitational field. We express the fermion Lagrangian mass term as a frame field term added to the covariant derivative; this extended covariant derivative defines a gravitational Lagrangian density proportional to the usual scalar curvatureR, plus a term quadratic in the curvature components. The quadratic term is expected to be negligible at distances much greater than the fermion Compton wavelength, and is of a general form widely studied in recent years. The frame field term used to derive this gravitational Lagrangian is essentially the same as that used previously to derive the electroweak interaction boson mass matrix without using the Higgs-Kibble mechanism.     

An acid-catalyzed macrolactonization protocol

[reaction: see text] An efficient macrolactonization protocol devoid of any base was developed derived from the use of vinyl esters in transesterification. Subjecting a hydroxy acid and ethoxyacetylene to 2 mol % [RuCl(2)(p-cymene)](2) in toluene followed by addition of camphorsulfonic acid or inverse addition provided macrolactones in good yields.     

Cations M2(O2CtBu)4+, where M = Mo and W, and MoW(O2CtBu)4+. Theoretical, spectroscopic, and structural investigations

With the aid of density function theory, the molecular and electronic structures of the molecules Mo2(O2CMe)4, MoW(O2CMe)4, and W2(O2CMe)4 and their single-electron oxidized radical cations have been determined; this includes calculated observables such as v(MM) and the delta --> delta* electronic transition energies. The calculated properties are compared with those for the corresponding pivalates, M2(O2CtBu)4 (M = Mo or W) and MoW(O2CtBu)4 and their radical cations prepared in situ by oxidation with Cp2FePF6. The EPR spectra of the radical cations are also reported. The EPR spectrum of the MoW(O2CtBu)4+ cation reveals that the unpaired electron is in a polarized MM delta orbital having 70% Mo and 30% W character. The MM stretching frequencies show good correlation with the MM bond lengths obtained from single-crystal X-ray diffraction studies of MoW(O2CtBu)4, W2(O2CtBu)4, and W2(O2CtBu)4+PF6- compounds, along with previously reported structures. These data provide benchmark parameters for valence trapped dicarboxylate bridged radical cations of the type [(tBuCO2)3M2]2(micro-O2C-X-CO2)+ (X = conjugated spacer).     

On the electron delocalization in the radical cations formed by oxidation of MM quadruple bonds linked by oxalate and perfluoroterephthalate bridges

Electron paramagnetic resonance, electronic absorption, and resonance Raman spectroscopy reveal that in the oxalate-bridged compounds, [[(tBuCO2)3M2]2(mu-O2CCO2)]+[PF6]-, the unpaired electron is delocalized over four metal centers (M = Mo or W) as a result of M2 delta to bridge pi conjugation, but in the related cationic perfluoroterephthalate-bridged species, the tungsten complex is delocalized and the molybdenum analogue valence trapped.     

Electronically coupled MM quadruply-bonded complexes (M = Mo or W) employing functionalized terephthalate bridges: toward molecular rheostats and switches

Toluene solutions of M2(O2C(t)Bu)4 (M = Mo, W; 2 equiv) react with a range of functionalized terephthalic acids, HO2CArCO2H (Ar = C6H4, C6F4, C6Cl4, C6H2-2,5-Cl2, C6H2-2,5-(OH)2, C6H3-2-F), to give [(tBuCO2)3M2]2[mu-O2CArCO2]. These compounds show intense ML(bridge)CT absorptions in the visible region of the electronic spectrum, and the terephthalate bridge serves to electronically couple the two M2 units via interactions between the M2 delta and bridge pi orbitals. Electronic structure calculations reveal how the degree of electronic coupling is controlled by the dihedral angles between the terephthalate C6 ring and the two CO2 units and the degree of interaction between the M4 delta MOs and the LUMO of the bridge. Both of these factors are controlled by the aryl substituents, and collectively these determine the thermochromism displayed by these complexes in solution together with the physical properties of the oxidized radical cations as determined by electrochemical studies (CV, DPV), UV-vis-NIR and EPR spectroscopic methods.     

M2 delta-to-oxalate pi* conjugation in oxalate-bridged complexes containing M-M quadruple bonds

The electronic structures of oxalate-bridged, quadruply-bonded dimolybdenum and ditungsten compounds have been investigated by a variety of computational methods employing density function theory (gradient corrected and time-dependent) which reveal the consequences of strong mixing of M2 delta and oxalate pi orbitals within extended chains and cyclic structures.     

Structural motifs in acetoacetanilides: the effect of a fluorine substituent

The structures of three fluoro‐substituted acetoacetanilides, namely 2′‐, 3′‐ and 4′‐fluoro­acetoacetanilide, all C₁₀H₁₀FNO₂, are presented and discussed. We observe a planar structure with intramolecular hydrogen bonding when the F atom is in the ortho position of the aromatic ring, and a twisted structure with intermolecular hydrogen bonding when the F atom is in the meta or para positions. It can be predicted which of these two structural motifs will be adopted by considering the position of any aromatic substituents. In this regard, fluorine appears to mimic the steric effect of a larger substituent, which we attribute to its high electronegativity.     

Alkoxide Clusters of Molybdenum and Tungsten as Templates for Organometallic Chemistry: Comparison with Carbonyl Clusters of the Later Transition Elements

Alkoxide and carbonyl ligands complement each other because they both behave as “π buffers” to transition metals. Alkoxides, which are π donors, stabilize early transition metals in high oxidation states by donating electrons into vacant d_π orbitals, whereas carbonyls, which are π acceptors, stabilize later transition elements in their lower oxidation states by accepting electrons from filled d_π orbitals. Both ligands readily form bridges that span M? M bonds. In solution fluxional processes that involve bridge–terminal ligand exchange are common to both alkoxide and carbonyl ligands. The fragments [W(OR)₃], [CpW(CO)₂], [Co(CO)₃], and CH are related by the isolobal analogy. Thus the compounds [(RO)₃W ? W(OR)₃], [Cp(CO)₂W?W(CO)₂Cp], hypothetical [(CO)₃Co?Co(CO)₃], and HC?CH are isolobal. Alkoxide and carbonyl cluster compounds often exhibit striking similarities with respect to substrate binding—e.g., [W₃(μ₃-CR)(OR′)₉] versus [Co₃(μ₃-CR)(CO)₉] and [W₄(C)(NMe)(OiPr)₁₂] versus [Fe₄(C)(CO)₁₃]—but differ with respect to M? M bonding. The carbonyl clusters use e_g-type orbitals for M? M bonding whereas the alkoxide clusters employ t_2g-type orbitals. Another point of difference involves electronic saturation. In general, each metal atom in a metal carbonyl cluster has an 18-electron count; thus, activation of the cluster often requires thermal or photochemical CO expulsion or M? M bond homolysis. Alkoxide clusters, on the other hand, behave as electronically unsaturated species because the π electrons are ligand-centered and the LUMO metal-centered. Also, access to the metal centers may be sterically controlled in metal alkoxide clusters by choice of alkoxide groups whereas ancillary ligands such as tertiary phosphanes or cyclopentadienes must be introduced if steric factors are to be modified in carbonyl clusters. A comparison of the reactivity of alkynes and ethylene with dinuclear alkoxide and carbonyl compounds is presented. For the carbonyl compounds CO ligand loss is a prerequisite for substrate uptake and subsequent activation. For [M₂(OR)₆] compounds (M = Mo and W) the nature of substrate uptake and activation is dependent upon the choice of M and R, leading to a more diverse chemistry.