全文获取类型
收费全文 | 851篇 |
免费 | 359篇 |
国内免费 | 326篇 |
专业分类
化学 | 514篇 |
晶体学 | 10篇 |
力学 | 74篇 |
综合类 | 33篇 |
数学 | 226篇 |
物理学 | 679篇 |
出版年
2023年 | 21篇 |
2022年 | 43篇 |
2021年 | 21篇 |
2020年 | 26篇 |
2019年 | 19篇 |
2018年 | 38篇 |
2017年 | 33篇 |
2016年 | 32篇 |
2015年 | 25篇 |
2014年 | 54篇 |
2013年 | 49篇 |
2012年 | 64篇 |
2011年 | 42篇 |
2010年 | 50篇 |
2009年 | 71篇 |
2008年 | 90篇 |
2007年 | 74篇 |
2006年 | 59篇 |
2005年 | 55篇 |
2004年 | 66篇 |
2003年 | 43篇 |
2002年 | 38篇 |
2001年 | 38篇 |
2000年 | 46篇 |
1999年 | 39篇 |
1998年 | 35篇 |
1997年 | 63篇 |
1996年 | 49篇 |
1995年 | 23篇 |
1994年 | 38篇 |
1993年 | 27篇 |
1992年 | 29篇 |
1991年 | 24篇 |
1990年 | 12篇 |
1989年 | 15篇 |
1988年 | 7篇 |
1987年 | 7篇 |
1986年 | 4篇 |
1985年 | 14篇 |
1984年 | 4篇 |
1983年 | 7篇 |
1982年 | 7篇 |
1981年 | 4篇 |
1980年 | 3篇 |
1979年 | 4篇 |
1964年 | 2篇 |
1963年 | 2篇 |
1962年 | 2篇 |
1959年 | 2篇 |
1956年 | 5篇 |
排序方式: 共有1536条查询结果,搜索用时 15 毫秒
51.
52.
红细胞膜上各种磷脂中脂肪酸的测定 总被引:3,自引:0,他引:3
应用自制硅胶板的薄层色谱法分离了红细胞膜上四种主要磷脂。将分离后的每种磷脂斑点硅胶涂层刮下,不经萃取,直接在无水甲醇-苯-乙酰氯溶液中进行转移甲基化,然后用毛细管相色谱分离测定其脂肪酸组成和含量。上述方法已成功地用于先天愚型病人和正常人红细胞膜上各种磷脂中脂肪酸轮廓分析,获得有意义的结果。 相似文献
53.
分析仪器是仪器仪表的重要组成部分,在农业、能源、生物、信息、环境、材料等众多领域高速发展的多重需求刺激下,展现出良好的市场潜力,再加上分析仪器技术的快速进步,使得分析仪器产品的更新换代周期不断缩短,世界分析仪器市场已经迎来高速发展时期。从2000年到2004年,全球分析仪器产品的销售额一直保持着11%左右的速度增长,美国分析仪器的销售额在2004年突破40亿美元, 相似文献
54.
55.
Cu-Mg/Al复合氧化物催化碳颗粒物燃烧性能的研究 总被引:5,自引:0,他引:5
恒定二价与三价阳离子比为3(nM2+/nM3+=3),采用共沉淀法制备不同Cu含量的系列水滑石前驱物, 800 ℃焙烧4 h形成复合氧化物(CuO质量百分数分别为0%、5%、10%、15%、20%、30%、40%)用作柴油车排放碳颗粒物燃烧的催化剂,并采用XRD、BET、TG-DSC、FT-IR、TPR等表征手段研究了Cu、Mg含量对材料前驱物物化性能的影响及对其衍生复合氧化物催化碳颗粒物燃烧性能的影响.结果表明,Cu、Mg含量对材料的热稳定性、比表面和催化氧化活性有显著的影响. Mg有助于提高催化剂的热稳定性; Cu含量增加,催化剂比表面下降,但比表面不是影响催化剂活性的主要因素. CuO含量为15%时,催化剂具有最好的催化活性和稳定性,碳颗粒物的起燃温度(T10)和半转化温度(T50)分别为336 ℃和409 ℃.在CuO含量≤30%时可以形成结构完整的水滑石前驱物, CuO含量为40%时出现Cu(OH)2杂相; CuO含量< 20%时,经高温焙烧可得到均匀的复合氧化物, CuO含量≥20%时出现CuO偏析. TPR结果表明焙烧温度和复合氧化物的组成决定了材料的可还原性能. 相似文献
56.
水溶性金属卟啉肿瘤靶向磁共振成像造影剂的研究 总被引:5,自引:0,他引:5
利用显微荧光-阿达玛变换三维图像分析研究了Cu-TSPP,Mn-TSPP,Cu-TMAP,Mn-TMAP4种水溶性金属卟啉人细胞间质进入肿瘤细胞内的富集过程,对金属卟啉的自旋-晶格驰豫性能(R1)的天空结果表明,Mn(Ⅱ)卟啉配合物的R1、值结Gd-DTPA提高1.5-2倍。 相似文献
57.
高灵敏度无机分光光度法 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
前言对于分析方法,特别是工业分析方法,一般都希望不使用价格昂贵的特殊装置;操作简便;不论何人、何时、何地使用均能得到可靠的数据。而分光光度法在相当程度上能满足这样的要求。虽然现在各种仪器分析方法得到了迅速的发展,但分光光度法仍然广泛应用于各个领域,日本工业标准等法定的分析方法亦采用分光光度法,其原因恐怕就在于此。如果能将分光光度法韵应用范围从以往的痕量成分分析扩大到超痕量成分分析,那将是非常理想的。从这个观点出发, 相似文献
58.
59.
{[Cu^Ⅱ(Hpb)(mal)]H=O}n (Hpb=2-2'-pyridylbenzimidazole, mal=maleic acid) is a helical chain-like polymer complex. In order to investigate the electronic structure of the complex, the monomer Cu^Ⅱ(Hpb)(mal) was obturated with different functional groups respectively. For these selective segments, the geometry optimizations were conducted by using hybrid DFT (B3LYP)methods to find that the structure obturated with H2O was better consistent with the experiment, and then this model would be used to latter calculations, such as the frontier molecular orbital and the NBO charge population analysis. In addition the magnetic behaviors of this complex were analyzed by experiments and the weak antiferromagnetic couple between copper(Ⅱ) ions was observed. The exchange coupling constant was calculated by DFT based on the spin broken symmetry formalism. The calculated coupling constants were in good agreement with the experimental data. 相似文献
60.
A general method in considering the core electronic correlation energies has been proposed and introduced into the standard Gaussian-2 (G2)[7] theory by small post-Hartree-Fock calculations. In this paper an additional MP2(FC)/6-31G(d) calculation over the G2 procedures is employed and examined in modification in modification to the flaw of Frozen-Core (FC) approximation of G2 vai eq.:
ΔE(full)= E[MP2(full)/6-31G(d)]-E[MP2(FC)/6-31G(d)]
where the MP2(full)/6-31G(d) energy has been obtained in the molecular geometry optimizations. This energy, ΔE(full), is directly added into the total G2 energy of a molecule in facilitating the effect of core electronic correlations for each molecule in chemical reactions. It has been shown that the over-all average absolute deviation for the 125 reaction energies of the G2 test set (test set 1) is slightly reduced from 5.09 to 5.01 kJ, mol(-1) while for the 55 D0 values, which have been used for the derivation of the A coefficient of the empirical High-Level...更多-Correction (HLC), it is also reduced from 4.99 [for both G2 and G2(COMPLETE)[8]]to 4.77 kJ• mol(-1). In addition, larger errors (greater than ±8.4 kJ•mol(-1) for the D0 energies are improved, especially for the largest error of the D0 of SO2 This error is reduced from 21.3 to 15.4 kJ. mol(-1), in which the experimental geometry would further reduce it by 7.1kJ.mol(-1)[8]. Another improvement is the absolute value of the A coefficient in HLC being reduced from 4.81 for G2 to 4.34 milli-hartrees which is believed to be useful in isolating the relationship between the HLC and the FC approximation. Modifications to the original G2 from this work is denoted as G2(fu 1) and thus the G2 (fu 1) total energy for a molecule is
E[G2(fu 1)]= E[G2]+Δ E(full)h
with a new ΔE[HLC] =-0.19α- 4.34nβ milli-hartree. 相似文献
ΔE(full)= E[MP2(full)/6-31G(d)]-E[MP2(FC)/6-31G(d)]
where the MP2(full)/6-31G(d) energy has been obtained in the molecular geometry optimizations. This energy, ΔE(full), is directly added into the total G2 energy of a molecule in facilitating the effect of core electronic correlations for each molecule in chemical reactions. It has been shown that the over-all average absolute deviation for the 125 reaction energies of the G2 test set (test set 1) is slightly reduced from 5.09 to 5.01 kJ, mol(-1) while for the 55 D0 values, which have been used for the derivation of the A coefficient of the empirical High-Level...更多-Correction (HLC), it is also reduced from 4.99 [for both G2 and G2(COMPLETE)[8]]to 4.77 kJ• mol(-1). In addition, larger errors (greater than ±8.4 kJ•mol(-1) for the D0 energies are improved, especially for the largest error of the D0 of SO2 This error is reduced from 21.3 to 15.4 kJ. mol(-1), in which the experimental geometry would further reduce it by 7.1kJ.mol(-1)[8]. Another improvement is the absolute value of the A coefficient in HLC being reduced from 4.81 for G2 to 4.34 milli-hartrees which is believed to be useful in isolating the relationship between the HLC and the FC approximation. Modifications to the original G2 from this work is denoted as G2(fu 1) and thus the G2 (fu 1) total energy for a molecule is
E[G2(fu 1)]= E[G2]+Δ E(full)h
with a new ΔE[HLC] =-0.19α- 4.34nβ milli-hartree. 相似文献