q-Weyl coefficients forU q (3) andq-Racah coefficients forSU q (2)

We show that theq-Weyl coefficients of the quantum algebraSU _q (3) are equal to theq-Racah coefficients of the quantum algebraSU _q (2) (up to a simple phase factor). Using aq-analog of the resummation procedure we obtain also theq-analogues of all known general analytical expressions for the 6j-symbols (or the Racah coefficients) of the quantum algebraSU _q (2) starting from one such formula.Presented at the 4th Colloquium Quantum groups and integrable systems, Prague, 22–24 June 1995.The research described in this publication was supported in part by Grants No. MB1000 and No. NRC000 from International Science Foundation.     

Incomplete idempotent Schröder quasigroups and related packing designs

Summary In this paper it is proved that, for any positive integern 2, 3 (mod 4),n 7, there exists an incomplete idempotent Schröder quasigroup with one hole of size two IISQ(n, 2) except forn = 10. It is also proved that for any positive integern 0, 1 (mod 4), there exists an idempotent Schröder quasigroup ISQ(n) except forn = 5 and 9. These results completely determine the spectrum of ISQ(n) and provide an application to the packing of a class of edge-coloured block designs.Research supported by NSERC grant A-5320.Research supported by NSFC grant 19231060-2.     

Weak relative pseudo-complements of closure operators

We define the notion of weak relative pseudo-complement on meet semi-lattices, and we show that it is strictly weaker than relative pseudo-complementation, but stronger than pseudo-complementation. Our main result is that if a complete lattice is meet-continuous, then every closure operator on admits weak relative pseudo-complements with respect to continuous closure operators on .Presented by E. T. Schmidt.     

Representation of elements of a sequence by sumsets

In this note the method of [5] and a result from [3] are combined to treat the following classical problem: Given a finite setA and an infinite sequenceS (both inZ), what is the minimal number of elements ofA whose sum lies inS? We obtain an upper bound depending only on the densities ofA andS (but not on their arithmetic nature).