Photodynamic Crosslinking of Proteins. III. Kinetics of the FMN- and Rose Bengal-sensitized Photooxidation and Intermolecular Crosslinking of Model Tyrosine-containing N-(2-Hydroxypropyl)methacrylamide Copolymers

As part of a study on the role of Tyr residues in the photosensitized intermolecular crosslinking of proteins, we have surveyed the kinetics of the rose bengal- and flavin mononucleotide (FMN)-sensitized photooxidation and crosslinking of a water-soluble N-(2-hydroxypropyl)methacrylamide copolymer with attached 6-carbon side chains terminating in tyrosinamide groups (thus the -OH group of the Tyr is free, but both the amino and carboxyl groups are blocked, simulating the situation of a nonterminal Tyr in a protein). The intermolecular photodynamic crosslinking of the Tyr copolymer can result only from the formation of Tyr-Tyr (dityrosine) bonds, because the copolymer itself is not photooxidizable. Rose bengal, primarily a Type II (singlet oxygen) sensitizer, sensitized the rapid photooxidation of the Tyr residue in the Tyr copolymer only at high pH, where the Tyr phenolic group is ionized; crosslinking did not occur with rose bengal under any of the reaction conditions used. In contrast, FMN, which can sensitize by both Type I (free radical) and Type II processes, sensitized the photooxidation of the Tyr copolymer over the pH range 4-9.5. Also, significant photocrosslinking occurred, but only from pH 4 to 8, with a maximum rate at pH 6. Crosslinking required the presence of oxygen. Studies with inhibitors, D2O as solvent, catalase and superoxide dismutase indicated that the photooxidation and photocrosslinking of the Tyr copolymer with FMN at pH 6 were not mediated by singlet oxygen, superoxide or hydrogen peroxide. It appears that crosslinking involves the abstraction of an H atom from the Tyr phenolic group to give Tyr and FMN radicals. The Tyr radical in one Tyr copolymer can then react with a Tyr radical in another Tyr copolymer to give an intermolecular dityrosine crosslink.     

Boron-pnictogen multiple bonds: donor-stabilized P=B and As=B bonds and a hindered iminoborane with a B-N triple bond

Reaction of the hindered phosphino- and arsinoboranes, Ar*Pn(H)-B(Br)Tmp (Ar* = -C6H3-2,6-(C6H2-2,4,6-iPr3)2; Tmp = 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidino; Pn = P and As, 1 and 3, respectively) with 4-dimethylaminopyridine, DMAP, afforded the boranylidenephosphane and arsane, Ar*Pn=B(DMAP)Tmp (Pn = P and As, 2 and 4) as deep red-purple solids. The analogous aminoboranes Ar'N(H)-B(X)Tmp (Ar' = -C6H3-2,6-(C6H2-2,4,6-Me3)2; X = Cl and Br; 5 and 6) did not display any reactivity with DMAP, but in the presence of the amide base, Na[N(SiMe3)2], the clean formation of the uncomplexed iminoborane Ar'NBTmp (7) was observed. Attempts to generate an Sb=B bond were unsuccessful, as the required stibinoborane precursor, Ar*Sb(H)-B(Br)Tmp, could not be prepared; in place of clean Sb-B bond formation, the reduced product Ar*Sb=SbAr* was obtained. All compounds were characterized spectroscopically, and the X-ray crystal structures of 1, 2, 4, 6, and 7 were determined.     

Lewis base induced tuning of the Ge-Ge bond order in a "digermyne"

The reaction of the "digermyne" Ar'GeGeAr' (Ar' = C6H3-2,6(C6H3-2,6-Pr(i)2)2; Ge-Ge = 2.2850(6) A) with mesityl isocyanide affords the bis adduct [Ar'GeGeAr'(CNMes)2] which results in the conversion of a Ge-Ge multiple bond to a long Ge-Ge single bond (= 2.6626(8) A).     

SENSITIZED PHOTOOXIDATION OF AMINO ACIDS: EFFECTS ON THE REACTIVITY OF THEIR PRIMARY AMINE GROUPS WITH FLUORESCAMINE AND O-PHTHALALDEHYDE

Abstract— The photooxidation of his, met, trp and tyr with methylene blue and eosin as sensitizers resulted in a loss of primary amine reactivity as measured with fluorescamine and o-phthalaldehyde. The rates of oxygen uptake and of loss of primary amine reactivity with illumination was characteristic for each amino acid. Glycine did not photooxidize and showed no change in primary amine reactivity. Primary amine reactivity of the N -acetyl derivatives of these amino acids was negligible and during photooxidation the reactivity increased slowly with N -acetylhis and N -acetyltrp while the reactivity of N -acetylmet and N -acetyltyr did not change. Imidazole and indole also showed a slow increase in primary amine reactivity during sensitized photooxidation. The rate of oxygen uptake and primary amine reactivity loss during the sensitized photooxidation of his and met was markedly increased in deuterium oxide. This indicated that singlet oxygen was involved. Radical scavengers did not affect the rates indicating that free radical intermediates were not involved. Primary amine reactivity loss is probably due to intra- and/or inter-molecular secondary dark reactions between unknown initial oxygenation products and primary amino groups.     

Facile activation of dihydrogen by an unsaturated heavier main group compound

The germanium alkyne analogue Ar'GeGeAr' (1, Ar' = C6H3-2,6(C6H3-2,6-Pri2)2) reacts with 1, 2, or 3 equiv of dihydrogen at room temperature, and at 1 atm pressure, to afford a mixture of the products Ar'HGeGeHAr' (2), Ar'H2GeGeH2Ar' (3), or Ar'GeH3 (4). The relative amounts of each product are governed by the number of equivalents of hydrogen used. A mechanism for the initial step in the reaction is proposed. The appearance of 4 among the reaction products was accounted for in terms of either its dissociation to monomers or isomerization to the bridged Ar'Ge(mu-H)2GeAr'. The reactions were monitored by 1H NMR spectroscopy. The products 2, 3, and 4 were characterized by X-ray crystallography, and 4 was synthesized independently by the reduction of Ar'Ge(OMe)3. These reactions represent the first direct addition of hydrogen to a closed shell unsaturated main group compound under ambient conditions.     

QUANTUM YIELDS AND KINETICS OF THE PHOTOBLEACHING OF HEMATOPORPHYRIN, PHOTOFRIN II, TETRA(4-SULFONATOPHENYL)-PORPHINE AND UROPORPHYRIN

Porphyrins used as sensitizers for the photodynamic therapy (PDT) of tumors are progressively destroyed (photobleached) during illumination. If the porphyrin bleaches too rapidly, tumor destruction will not be complete. However, with appropriate sensitizer dosages and bleaching rates, irreversible photodynamic injury to the normal tissues surrounding the tumor, which retain less sensitizer, may be significantly decreased. This paper surveys the quantum yields and kinetics of the photobleaching of four porphyrins: hematoporphyrin (HP), Photofrin II (PF II), tetra(4-sulfonatophenyl)porphine (TSPP) and uroporphyrin I (URO). The initial quantum yields of photobleaching, as measured in pH 7.4 phosphate buffer in air, were: 4.7 x 10(-5), 5.4 x 10(-5), 9.8 x 10(-6), and 2.8 x 10(-5) for HP, PF II, TSPP and URO respectively; thus, the rates of photobleaching are rather slow. Low oxygen concentration (2 microM) significantly reduced the photobleaching yields. However, D2O increased the yields only slightly, and the singlet oxygen quencher, azide, had no effect, even at 0.1 M. Photosensitizing porphyrins in body fluids, cells and tissues may be closely associated with various photooxidizable molecules and electron acceptors and donors. Therefore, selected model compounds in these categories were examined for their effects on porphyrin photobleaching. A number inhibited and/or accelerated photobleaching, depending on the compound, the porphyrin and the reaction conditions. For example, 1.0 mM furfuryl alcohol increased the photobleaching yields of HP and URO more than 5-fold, with little effect on PF II or TSPP. In contrast, the electron acceptor, methyl viologen, increased the photobleaching yield of TSPP more than 10-fold, with little accelerating effect on the other porphyrins. These results suggest that the mechanism(s) of the photobleaching of porphyrin photosensitizers in cells and tissues during PDT may be complex.     

One- and two-electron reduced 1,2-diketone ligands in [CrIII(L*)3] (S = 0) and Na2(Et2O)2[VIV(LRed)3] (S = 1/2)

The electronic structures of chromium and vanadium centers coordinated by three reduced 1,2-diketones have been elucidated by using density functional theory (DFT) calculations and a host of physical methods: X-ray crystallography; cyclic voltammetry; ultraviolet-visible (UV-vis), nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), and electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy; and magnetic susceptibility measurements. The metal center in octahedral [CrIII(L*)3]0 (1), a CrIII (d3) ion is coupled antiferromagnetically to three monoanionic ligand pi-radicals affording an S ) 0 ground state. In contrast, Na2(Et2O)2[VIV(LRed)3] (2) (S ) 1/2), possesses a central VIV (d1) ion O,OE-coordinated to three closed-shell, doubly reduced ligands which in turn are coordinated by two Na cations enforcing a trigonal prismatic geometry at the vanadium center. 2 can be oxidized electrochemically by one and two electrons generating a monoanion, [V(L)3]1-, and a neutral species, [V(L)3]0, respectively. DFT calculations atthe B3LYP level show that the one-electron oxidized product contains an octahedral VIV ion coupled antiferromagnetically to one monoanionic ligand pi-radical [VIV(L*)(LRed)2]1- (S ) 0). In contrast, the two-electron oxidized product contains a VIII ion coupled antiferromagnetically to three ligand pi-radicals in an octahedral field[VIII(L*)3]0 (S ) 1/2).