Multicomponent Polymers of Poly(Lactic Acid) Macromonomers with Methacrylate Terminal and Copolymers of Poly(2-Hydroxyethyl Methacrylate)

Abstract

Poly(lactic acid) macromonomers with methacrylate terminal functionality have been synthesized from the cyclic dimer of lactic acid (referred to as lactide) with 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) as initiator and stannous 2-ethyl hexanoate as catalyst. The macromonomers were characterized with FT-IR, NMR, GPC, DSC, WAXS, and CD. The molecular weights of the macromonomers ranging from M _n 1425 to 19,169 are predictable from the lactide/HEMA ratio in the polymerization feeds. The properties of the macromonomers vary with the stereochemistry of the lactide and the composition. Circular dichroism measurements demonstrate that there is little racemization during polymerization.     

Allyl sulfides and α‐substituted acrylates as addition–fragmentation chain transfer agents for methacrylate polymer networks

The rapid and uncontrolled nature of network formation from di(meth)acrylate monomers produces high shrinkage stress and results in polymers with oftentimes brittle mechanical properties. Methods for regulating polymerization and network formation are sought. One option is the use of addition–fragmentation chain transfer (AFCT) agents, which are well known to control molecular weight and molecular weight distribution of monofunctional (meth)acrylates. A series of novel and previously described AFCT reagents were synthesized and screened with laser flash photolysis to determine reactivity. Well‐performing AFCT reagents were then tested in polymerizations with monofunctional and difunctional methacrylates. With monofunctional monomers, the molecular weight and polydispersity of the resultant linear polymers tend to decrease with the addition of AFCT agent. In copolymerization with dimethacrylate monomers, the AFCT agents were found to substantially lower and sharpen the glass transition. Sharpness of the glass transition is here indicative of a more regular and homogenous network. After coupling of the instruments, photorheology was performed simultaneously with real‐time IR to show an increase in monomer conversion at the time of gelation, which appears to have a positive effect on reducing shrinkage stress. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 2016 , 54, 394–406     

A semiempirical approach to ligand‐binding affinities: Dependence on the Hamiltonian and corrections

We present a combination of semiempirical quantum‐mechanical (SQM) calculations in the conductor‐like screening model with the MM/GBSA (molecular‐mechanics with generalized Born and surface‐area solvation) method for ligand‐binding affinity calculations. We test three SQM Hamiltonians, AM1, RM1, and PM6, as well as hydrogen‐bond corrections and two different dispersion corrections. As test cases, we use the binding of seven biotin analogues to avidin, nine inhibitors to factor Xa, and nine phenol‐derivatives to ferritin. The results vary somewhat for the three test cases, but a dispersion correction is mandatory to reproduce experimental estimates. On average, AM1 with the DH2 hydrogen‐bond and dispersion corrections gives the best results, which are similar to those of standard MM/GBSA calculations for the same systems. The total time consumption is only 1.3–1.6 times larger than for MM/GBSA. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Composition Operators and Endomorphisms

If b is an inner function, then composition with b induces an endomorphism, β, of L^￥(\mathbbT){L^\infty({\mathbb{T}})} that leaves H^￥(\mathbbT){H^\infty({\mathbb{T}})} invariant. We investigate the structure of the endomorphisms of B(L²(\mathbbT)){B(L^2({\mathbb{T}}))} and B(H²(\mathbbT)){B(H^2({\mathbb{T}}))} that implement β through the representations of L^￥(\mathbbT){L^\infty({\mathbb{T}})} and H^￥(\mathbbT){H^\infty({\mathbb{T}})} in terms of multiplication operators on L²(\mathbbT){L^2({\mathbb{T}})} and H²(\mathbbT){H^2({\mathbb{T}})} . Our analysis, which is based on work of Rochberg and McDonald, will wind its way through the theory of composition operators on spaces of analytic functions to recent work on Cuntz families of isometries and Hilbert C*-modules.