Comparison of resolution in microemulsion EKC and MEKC employing suppressed electroosmosis: application to bisphenol-A-diglycidyl ether and its derivatives

The resolution (R(s)) of hydrophobic analytes in microemulsion EKC (MEEKC) and MEKC with suppressed electroosmosis was investigated using bisphenol-A-diglycidyl ether and its derivatives (BADGEs) as test analytes. Separation scales were compared using our equation for the resolution, R(s)= (square rootN/4)(alpha-1)/(1+K(2)),where k is the retention factor, alpha the selectivity (alpha = k(2)/k(1) for k(2) > or = k(1)>0), and N the average efficiency. At given concentrations of SDS and organic cosolvent in the buffer, in comparison with MEKC, MEEKC was found to provide better resolution of BADGEs, mainly due to the significantly smaller k in MEEKC, but not the greater alpha in MEEKC, while a comparable range of N. Significantly improved resolution of BADGEs was obtained with increase in the concentration of organic cosolvent in the MEEKC and MEKC buffers, while small change in R(s) with the SDS concentration in a range of 100-180 mM. In addition, a decrease in temperature or voltage resulted in slightly better R(s).     

Retention factor and retention index of homologous series compounds in microemulsion electrokinetic chromatography employing suppressed electroosmosis

The retention factor (k) and retention index (I) of homologous series compounds such as alkylbenzenes (BZ), alkylaryl ketones, alkylbenzoates, and alkylparabens in microemulsion electrokinetic chromatography (MEEKC) with suppressed electroosmosis were investigated in a wide range of SDS concentrations ([SDS]), temperatures, and concentrations of organic cosolvents (phi). Using BZ as standards, the retention indices of other homologous series compounds were determined and they were found to be independent of [SDS] and temperature, while are dependent on the types and concentrations of organic cosolvents. The retention factor linearly increases with increasing [SDS], while linearly decreases with increasing temperature. The value of log k linearly decreases with increasing phi for methanol, ethanol, or ACN, while decreases by a second-degree polynomial with increasing phi for 2-propanol. Excellent agreement was found between the observed and predicted values of log k of analytes in MEEKC at given [SDS] and phi, where the predicted values were obtained from modified equations of the linear relationship of log k as functions of [SDS], the number of carbons, and phi. Therefore, both k and I can be used for peak identification of homologous series compounds.     

High throughput analysis of 150 pesticides in fruits and vegetables using QuEChERS and low-pressure gas chromatography–time-of-flight mass spectrometry

A higher monitoring rate is highly desirable in the labs, but this goal is typically limited by sample throughput. In this study, we sought to assess the real-world applicability of fast, low-pressure GC–time-of-flight MS (LP-GC/TOFMS) for the identification and quantification of 150 pesticides in tomato, strawberry, potato, orange, and lettuce samples. Buffered and unbuffered versions of QuEChERS (which stands for “quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged, and safe”) using dispersive solid-phase extraction (d-SPE) and disposable pipette extraction (DPX) for clean-up were compared for sample preparation. For clean-up of all sample types, a combination of 150 mg MgSO₄, 50 mg primary secondary amine (PSA), 50 mg C₁₈, and 7.5 mg graphitized carbon black (GCB) per mL extract was used. No significant differences were observed in the results between the different sample preparation versions. QuEChERS took <10 min per individual sample, or <1 h for two chemists to prepare 32 pre-homogenized samples, and using LP-GC/TOFMS, <10 min run time and <15 min cycle time allowed >32 injections in 8 h. Overall, >126 analytes gave recoveries (3 spiking levels) in the range of 70–120% with <20% RSD. The results indicate that LP-GC/TOFMS for GC-amenable analytes matches UHPLC–MS/MS in terms of sample throughput and turnaround time for their routine, concurrent use in the analysis of a wide range of analytes in QuEChERS extracts to achieve reliable quantification and identification of pesticide residues in foods.     

Efficient hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry for the multiclass analysis of veterinary drugs in chicken muscle

A simple and sensitive method has been developed for multiresidue analysis of 24 important veterinary drugs (including 3 aminoglycosides, 3 β-lactams, 2 lincosamides, 4 macrolides, 4 quinolones, 4 sulfonamides, 3 tetracyclines, and amprolium) in chicken muscle. The method involved a simple extraction using (1:1, v/v) of 2% trichloroacetic acid in water-acetonitrile, followed by removing fat with hexane, dilution of sample extract, and filtration prior to liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometric (LC-MS/MS) analysis. Hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography (HILIC) proved to be very effective for separation of a wide range of polar and hydrophilic compounds (providing high sensitivity and good peak shape) compared to reversed phase and ion-pair separation. The method was successfully validated according to the European Decision 2002/657/EC. Average recoveries were 53-99% at 0.5-MRL, MRL, and 1.5-MRL spiking levels, with satisfactory precision ≤15% RSD. The limit of detection of the method was 0.1-10 μgkg(-1) for 22 analytes and 20 μgkg(-1) for aminoglycosides. These values were lower than the maximum residue limits (MRLs) established by the European Union. The evaluated method provides reliable screening, quantification, and identification of 24 veterinary drug residues in foods of animal origin. It has been successfully tested in real samples (such as chicken muscle, shrimp, and egg).     

Comparison of QuEChERS sample preparation methods for the analysis of pesticide residues in fruits and vegetables

This article describes the comparison of different versions of an easy, rapid and low-cost sample preparation approach for the determination of pesticide residues in fruits and vegetables by concurrent use of gas and liquid chromatography (GC and LC) coupled to mass spectrometry (MS) for detection. The sample preparation approach is known as QuEChERS, which stands for “quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged and safe”. The three compared versions were based on the original unbuffered method, which was first published in 2003, and two interlaboratory validated versions: AOAC Official Method 2007.01, which uses acetate buffering, and European Committee for Standardization (CEN) Standard Method EN 15662, which calls for citrate buffering. LC–MS/MS and GC–MS analyses using each method were tested from 50 to 1000 ng/g in apple–blueberry sauce, peas and limes spiked with 32 representative pesticides. As expected, the results were excellent (overall average of 98% recoveries with 10% RSD) using all 3 versions, except the unbuffered method gave somewhat lower recoveries for the few pH-dependent pesticides. The different methods worked equally well for all matrices tested with equivalent amounts of matrix co-extractives measured, matrix effects on quantification and chemical noise from matrix in the chromatographic backgrounds. The acetate-buffered version gave higher and more consistent recoveries for pymetrozine than the other versions in all 3 matrices and for thiabendazole in limes. None of the versions consistently worked well for chlorothalonil, folpet or tolylfluanid in peas, but the acetate-buffered method gave better results for screening of those pesticides. Also, due to the recent shortage in acetonitrile (MeCN), ethyl acetate (EtOAc) was evaluated as a substitute solvent in the acetate-buffered QuEChERS version, but it generally led to less clean extracts and lower recoveries of pymetrozine, thiabendazole, acephate, methamidophos, omethoate and dimethoate. In summary, the acetate-buffered version of QuEChERS using MeCN exhibited advantages compared to the other tested methods in the study.