A QXP-based multistep docking procedure for accurate prediction of protein-ligand complexes

The two great challenges of the docking process are the prediction of ligand poses in a protein binding site and the scoring of the docked poses. Ligands that are composed of extended chains in their molecular structure display the most difficulties, predominantly because of the torsional flexibility. On the basis of the molecular docking program QXP-Flo+0802, we have developed a procedure particularly for ligands with a high degree of rotational freedom that allows the accurate prediction of the orientation and conformation of ligands in protein binding sites. Starting from an initial full Monte Carlo docking experiment, this was achieved by performing a series of successive multistep docking runs using a local Monte Carlo search with a restricted rotational angle, by which the conformational search space is limited. The method was established by using a highly flexible acetylcholinesterase inhibitor and has been applied to a number of challenging protein-ligand complexes known from the literature.     

Comparison of solidification of floating drop and homogenous liquid–liquid microextractions for the extraction of two plasticizers from the water kept in PET‐bottles

Two approaches based on solidification of floating drop microextraction (SFDME) and homogenous liquid–liquid microextraction (HLLE) were compared for the extraction and preconcentration of di‐(2‐ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) and di‐(2‐ethylhexyl) adipate (DEHA) from the mineral water samples. In SFDME, a floated drop of the mixture of acetophenone/1‐undecanol (1:8) was exposed on the surface of the aqueous solution and extraction was permitted to occur. In HLLE, a homogenous ternary solvent system was used by water/methanol/chloroform and the phase separation phenomenon occurred by salt addition. Under the optimal conditions, the LODs for the two target plasticizers (DEHA and DEHP), obtained by SFDME–GC‐FID and HLLE–GC‐FID, were ranged from 0.03 to 0.01 μg/L and 0.02 to 0.01 μg/L, respectively. HLLE provided higher preconcentration factors (472.5‐ and 551.2‐fold) within the shorter extraction time as well as better RSDs (4.5–6.9%). While, in SFDME, high preconcentration factors in the range of 162–198 and good RSDs in the range of 5.2–9.6% were obtained. Both methods were applied for the analysis of two plasticizers in different water samples and two target plasticizers were found in the bottled mineral water after the expiring time and the boiling water was exposed to a polyethylene vial.