In an earlier publication (
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002 ,
124, 7111) we showed that polymeric cationic [Ag(P
4S
3)
n]
+ complexes (
n=1, 2) are accessible if partnered with a suitable weakly coordinating counterion of the type [Al(OR
F)
4]
? (OR
F: poly‐ or perfluorinated alkoxide). The present work addresses the following questions that could not be answered in the initial report: How many P
4S
3 cages can be bound to a Ag
+ ion? Why are these complexes completely dynamic in solution in the
31P NMR experiments? Can these dynamics be frozen out in a low‐temperature
31P MAS NMR experiment? What are the principal binding sites of the P
4S
3 cage towards the Ag
+ ion? What are likely other isomers on the [Ag(P
4S
3)
n]
+ potential energy surface? Counterion influence: Reactions of P
4S
3 with Ag[Al{OC(CH
3)(CF
3)
2}
4] (Ag[hftb]) and Ag[{(CF
3)
3CO}
3Al‐F‐Al{OC(CF
3)
3)}
3] (Ag[al‐f‐al]) gave [(P
4S
3)Ag[hftb]]
∞ ( 7 ) as a molecular species, whereas [Ag
2(P
4S
3)
6]
2+[al‐f‐al]
?2 ( 8 ) is an isolated 2:1 salt. We suggest that a maximum of three P
4S
3 cages may be bound on average to an Ag
+ ion. Only isolated dimeric dications are formed with the largest cation, but polymeric species are obtained with all other smaller aluminates. Thermodynamic Born–Haber cycles, DFT calculations, as well as solution NMR and ESI mass spectrometry indicate that 8 exhibits an equilibrium between the dication [Ag
2(P
4S
3)
6]
2+ (in the solid state) and two [Ag(P
4S
3)
3]
+ monocations (in the gas phase and in solution). Dynamics:
31P MAS NMR spectroscopy showed these solid adducts to be highly dynamic, to an extent that the
2JP,P coupling within the cages could be resolved (
J‐res experiment). This is supported by DFT calculations, which show that the extended PES of [Ag(P
4S
3)
n]
+ (
n=1–3) and [Ag
2(P
4S
3)
2]
+ is very flat. The structures of α‐ and γ‐P
4S
3 were redetermined. Their variable‐temperature
31P MAS NMR spectra are discussed jointly with those of all four currently known [Ag(P
4S
3)
n]
+ adducts with
n=1, 2, and 3.
相似文献