A DFT‐GIAO and DFT‐NBO study of polar substituent effects on NMR 17O chemical shifts in some rigid polycyclic alkanes

¹⁷O NMR shieldings of 3‐substituted(X)bicyclo[1.1.1]pentan‐1‐ols ( 1 , Y = OH), 4‐substituted(X)bicyclo[2.2.2]octan‐1‐ols ( 2 , Y = OH), 4‐substituted(X)‐bicyclo[2.2.1]heptan‐1‐ols ( 3 , Y = OH), 4‐substituted(X)‐cuban‐1‐ols ( 4 , Y = OH) and exo‐ and endo‐ 6‐substituted(X)exo‐bicyclo[2.2.1]heptan‐2‐ols ( 5 and 6 , Y = OH, respectively), as well as their conjugate bases ( 1 – 6 , Y = O^?), for a set of substituents (X = H, NO₂, CN, NC, CF₃, COOH, F, Cl, OH, NH₂, CH₃, SiMe₃, Li, O^?, and NH) covering a wide range of electronic substituent effects were calculated using the DFT‐GIAO theoretical model at the B3LYP/6‐311 + G(2d, p) level of theory. By means of natural bond orbital (NBO) analysis various molecular parameters were obtained from the optimized geometries. Linear regression analysis was employed to explore the relationship between the calculated ¹⁷O SCS and polar field and group electronegativity substituent constants (σ_F and σ_χ, respectively) and also the NBO derived molecular parameters (oxygen natural charge, Q_n, occupation numbers of the oxygen lone pairs, n_o, and occupancy of the C? O antibonding orbital, σ*_CO(occup)). In the case of the alcohols ( 1 – 6 , Y = OH) the ¹⁷O SCS appear to be governed predominantly by the σ_χ effect of the substituent. Furthermore, the key determining NBO parameters appear to be n_o and σ*_CO(occup). Unlike the alcohols, the calculated ¹⁷O SCS of the conjugate bases ( 1 – 6 , Y = O^?), except for system 1 , do not respond systematically to the electronic effects of the substituents. An analysis of the SCS of 1 (Y = O^?) raises a significant conundrum with respect to their origin. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Calculated polar substituent effects on the stability of 4‐substituted(X) ‐ cub‐1‐yl and ‐bicyclo[2.2.2]oct‐1‐yl cations: a DFT study

The effects of substituents on the stability of 4‐substituted(X) cub‐1‐yl cations ( 2 ), as well as the benchmark 4‐substituted(X) bicyclo[2.2.2]oct‐1‐yl cation systems ( 7 ), for a set of substituents (X = H, NO₂, CN, NC, CF₃, COOH , F, Cl, HO, NH₂, CH₃, SiH₃, Si(CH₃)₃, Li, O^?, and NH) covering a wide range of electronic substituent effects were calculated using the DFT theoretical model at the B3LYP/6‐311 + G(2d,p) level of theory. Linear regression analysis was employed to explore the relationship between the calculated relative hydride affinities (ΔE, kcal/mol) of the appropriate isodesmic reactions for 2 / 7 and polar field/group electronegativity substituent constants (σ_F and σ_χ, respectively). The analysis reveals that the ΔE values of both systems are best described by a combination of both substituent constants. This highlights the distinction between through‐space and through‐bond electronic influences characterized by σ_F and σ_χ, respectively. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.