Thiolate-bridged heterometallic complexes of manganese and platinum: Synthesis and molecular structures of (CO)4Mn(μ-SPh)Pt(PPh3)2, (CO)3(PPh3)Mn(μ-SPh)Pt(PPh3)(CO), and (CO)3Mn(μ-SPh)Pt(PPh3)(Dppm)

A reaction of the dimer [Mn(CO)₄(SPh)]₂ with (PPh₃)₂Pt(C₂Ph₂) gave the heterometallic complex (CO)₄Mn(μ-SPh)Pt(PPh₃)₂ (I) and its isomer (CO)₃(PPh₃)Mn(μ-SPh)Pt(PPh₃)(CO) (II). A reaction of complex I with a diphosphine ligand (Dppm) yielded the heterometallic complex (CO)₃Mn(μ-SPh)Pt(PPh₃)(Dppm) (III). Complexes I–III were characterized by X-ray diffraction. In complex I, the single Mn-Pt bond (2.6946(3) ?) is supplemented with a thiolate bridge with the shortened Pt-S and Mn-S bonds (2.3129(5) and 2.2900(6) ?, respectively). Unlike complex I, in complex II, one phosphine group at the Pt atom is exchanged for one CO group at the Mn atom. The Mn-Pt bond (2.633(1) ?) and the thiolate bridge (Pt-S, 2.332(2) ?; Mn-S, 2.291(2) ?) are retained. In complex III, the Mn-Pt bond (2.623(1) ?) is supplemented with thiolate (Pt-S, 2.341(2) ?; Mn-S, 2.292(2) 0?) and Dppm bridges (Pt-P, 2.240(1)?; Mn-P, 2.245(2) ?). Apparently, the Pt atom in complexes I–III is attached to the formally double bond , as in Pt complexes with olefins.     

Spin squeezing and quantum correlations

We discuss the notion of spin squeezing considering two mutually exclusive classes of spin-s states, namely, oriented and non-oriented states. Our analysis shows that the oriented states are not squeezed while non-oriented states exhibit squeezing. We also present a new scheme for construction of spin-s states using 2s spinors oriented along different axes. Taking the case of s=1, we show that the ‘non-oriented’ nature and hence squeezing arise from the intrinsic quantum correlations that exist among the spinors in the coupled state.     

Antiferromagnetic complexes involving metalmetal bonds : I. Synthesis and molecular structure of an antiferromagnetic dimer with a CrCr bond

The binuclear complex (C₅H₅)₂Cr₂(S)(SCMe₃)₂ was prepared by refluxing a solution of chromocene and t-butylmercaptane in heptane. The structure of the product was determined by single crystal X-ray diffraction. The chronium atoms are linked by a sulphide bridge (SCr 2.24 Å;, <CrSCr 74.1° and two SCMe₃ bridges (CrS 2.38 Å;, <CrSCr 68.3–69.3°). The two cyclopentadienyl ligands (CC 1.41 Å;, CrC 2.23 Å;) are in apical positions, their ring planes being parallel to each other. The complex is an antiferromagnet (?2J cm^?1) despite the small CrSCr angles and short chromiumchromium distance (2.689 Å;) indicative of strong CrCr bonding.     

Synthesis and molecular structure of tricarbonyl(diphenyl ditelluride)diiodoiron (CO)3FeI2(Te2Ph2) and tricarbonyldiiodo[iodo(phenyl)tellurido]iron (CO)3FeI2(PhTeI): First example of the coordination of unstable PhTeI to the transition metal atom

A reaction of the tetramer [PhTeI]₄ with Fe(CO)₅ gave the monomeric complex (CO)₃FeI₂(Ph₂Te₂) (I) containing a diphenyl ditelluride molecule linked with cis-tricarbonyldiiodoiron. According to X-ray diffraction data, the Fe-Te distance in complex I (2.5724(6) ?) is appreciably shorter than the sum of the covalent Fe and Te radii and the Te-Te bond (2.7705(5) ?) is only slightly longer than that in free Ph₂Te₂ (2.705(1) ?). In the reaction of Fe(CO)₅ with PhTeI₃, a complex with PhTeI as a ligand to the transition metal atom was obtained for the first time. Unlike free PhTeI, the resulting complex (CO)₃FeI₂(PhTeI) (II) is stable in air at room temperature for several days. According to X-ray diffraction data, the ligand PhTeI (Te-C 2.126(4) ?, Te-I(3) 2.7548(5) ?) is stabilized by the coordination of tellurium to both the iron (Te-Fe 2.5451(6) ?) and iodine atoms (Te(1)-I(1) 3.1634(5) ?). The latter coordination probably involves the vacant d orbital of tellurium and the lone electron pair on the iodide ligand. Original Russian Text ? Yu.V. Torubaev, A.A. Pasynskii, P. Mathur, 2008, published in Koordinatsionnaya Khimiya, 2008, Vol. 34, No. 11, pp. 807–811.     

Synthesis and structure of mixed-metal thiolate complex Cp′Cr(CO)2(μ-SBu)Pt(PPh3)2: Side-on-coordination of Cr–S double bond with platinum

The reaction of [Cp′Cr(CO)₂(μ-SBu)]₂ (1) (Cp′ = MeC₅H₄) with (PPh₃)₂Pt(PhCCPh) gives Cp′Cr(CO)₂(μ-SBu)Pt(PPh₃)₂ (2) which could be regarded as a product of the substitution of acetylene ligand at platinum by a monomeric chromium–thiolate fragment. According to the X-ray diffraction analysis 2 contains single Cr–Pt (2.7538(15)) and Pt–S (2.294(2) Å) bonds while Cr–S bond (2.274(3) Å) is shortened in comparison with ordinary Cr–S bonds (2.4107(4)–2.4311(4) Å) in 1. The bonding between Cr–S fragment and platinum atom is similar to the olefine coordination in their platinum complexes.