排序方式: 共有4条查询结果,搜索用时 0 毫秒
1
1.
Alves GA Amato S Anjos JC Appel JA Astorga J Bracker SB Cremaldi LM Dagenhart WD Darling CL Dixon RL Errede D Fenker HC Gay C Green DR Jedicke R Karchin PE Kennedy C Kwan S Lueking LH de Mello Neto JR Metheny J Milburn RH de Miranda JM da Motta Filho H Napier A Passmore D Rafatian A dos Reis AC Ross WR Santoro AF Sheaff M Souza MH Spalding WJ Stoughton C Streetman ME Summers DJ Takach SF Wallace A Wu Z 《Physical review letters》1996,77(12):2388-2391
2.
W.K. Dagenhart P.H. Stelson F.K. Mcgowan R.L. Robinson W.T. Milner S. Raman W.K. Tuttle 《Nuclear Physics A》1977,284(3):484-500
Coulomb excitation of the nucleus 115Sn was studied with beams of 4He and 16O. Level energies, spins, mean-lives and B(E2) and B(M1) transition probabilities were obtained. Spin + states were observed at 497.35 and 1280.08 keV and spin + states were observed at 986.54 and 1416.78 keV. A state of 612.79 keV was observed to be indirectly excited by decay of the Coulomb excited states. Eleven B(E2) values and nine B(M1) values were obtained for the transitions between the low-lying states. In contrast to previous particle transfer results which suggested a clear distinction between shell-model and collective + and + states, our results suggest the collective strength is shared by the two + and two + states. 相似文献
3.
Alves GA Amato S Anjos JC Appel JA Astorga J Bracker SB Cremaldi LM Dagenhart WD Darling CL Dixon RL Errede D Fenker HC Gay C Green DR Jedicke R Karchin PE Kennedy C Kwan S Lueking LH de Mello Neto JR Metheny J Milburn RH de Miranda JM da Motta Filho H Napier A Passmore D Rafatian A dos Reis AC Ross WR Santoro AF Sheaff M Souza MH Spalding WJ Stoughton C Streetman ME Summers DJ Takach SF Wallace A Wu Z 《Physical review letters》1996,77(12):2392-2395
4.
G. Vourvopoulos M.B. Greenfield J.B. Ball S. Raman W.K. Dagenhart 《Physics letters. [Part B]》1974,52(2):187-188
The forward-angle differential cross sections have been measured for the 22Ne(p,t) reaction leading to the 4.97 MeV, 2? state in 20Ne. Comparison of the data with the results of calculations shows that the two-step mechanism responsible for exciting this state is (p-p′-t) rather than (p-d-t). 相似文献
1