Reply to Nathan: How to reconstruct the causal argument

Nicholas Nathan tries to resist the current version of the causal argument for sense-data in two ways. First he suggests that, on what he considers to be the correct re-construction of the argument, it equivocates on the sense of proximate cause. Second he defends a form of disjunctivism, by claiming that there might be an extra mechanism involved in producing veridical hallucination, that is not present in perception. I argue that Nathan’s reconstruction of the argument is not the appropriate one, and that, properly interpreted, the argument does not equivocate on proximate cause. Furthermore, I claim that his postulation of a modified mechanism for hallucinations is implausibly ad hoc.     

Competing kinetic pathways in the bromine addition to allylic ethers in 1,2‐dichloroethane: Opposite temperature effects

The kinetics of the electrophilic bromination of three allylic ethers in a nonprotic solvent, 1,2‐dichloroethane, has been investigated. Two of them followed a prevalent second‐order pathway, while the third one exhibited a classical, clean third order. The second‐order pathway in the first two olefins is attributed to electrophilic assistance of the ethereal oxygen to the attacking bromine molecule. In the molecular bromination of 2,4‐cis‐dimethyl‐8‐oxabicyclo[3.2.1]‐6‐octen‐3‐cis‐ol, opposite temperature dependences were found for the two different kinetic pathways. An exoergonic process for the second‐order reaction was explained by the lesser stability of the bromiranium–bromide ionic intermediate, compared to the bromiranium–tribromide in the third‐order profile. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. 39: 197–203, 2007     

Pit your wits against young minds!

This column is a place for those bits of contagious mathematics that travel from person to person in the community, because they are so elegant, suprising, or appealing that one has an urge to pass them on. Contributions are most welcome.