A measure of bullwhip effect in supply chains with a mixed autoregressive-moving average demand process

In this paper, we quantify the impact of the bullwhip effect – the phenomenon in which information on demand is distorted as moving up a supply chain – for a simple two-stage supply chain with one supplier and one retailer. Assuming that the retailer employs a base stock inventory policy, and that the demand forecast is performed via a mixed autoregressive-moving average model, ARMA(1, 1), we investigate the effects of the autoregressive coefficient, the moving average parameter, and the lead time on the bullwhip effect.     

Analyzing the behavior of the bullwhip effect considering different distribution systems

Recently, researchers have shown increased interest in quantifying the bullwhip effect, and several attempts have been made to alleviate this phenomenon within supply chain management; however, absent from the current literature surrounding this topic is an in-depth analysis of the impact of different distribution systems, particularly cross-docking systems, upon the behavior of the bullwhip effect. This research aims to investigate the measure of the bullwhip effect in three different supply-chains; (I) with a central warehouse, (II) with a cross-docking system, and (III) without any distribution systems. These three different supply chains are subsequently analyzed to discover which supply chain helps reduce the bullwhip effect more. In doing so, the reasoning here is based on the premise that the demand process follows a mixed autoregressive-moving average model and all the stages employ the base stock policy for inventory replenishment, if necessary. In addition, the above mentioned supply chains are assumed to have two members in the retailer stage, with a different market share of the customer demand. It was found that factors such as lead time, market share of each retailer, autoregressive coefficient and moving average parameter contribute to the selection of the most effective distribution system.     

Conditions of reverse bullwhip effect in pricing for price-sensitive demand functions

Supply chain mechanisms that exacerbate price variation needs special attention, since price variation is one of the root causes of the bullwhip effect. In this study, we investigate conditions that create an amplification of price variation moving from the upstream suppliers to the downstream customers in a supply chain, which is referred as the “reverse bullwhip effect in pricing” (RBP). Considering initially a single-stage supply chain in which a retailer faces a random and price-sensitive demand, we derive conditions on a general demand function for which the retail price variation is higher than that of the wholesale price. The investigation is extended to a multi-stage supply chain in which the price at each stage is determined by a game theoretical framework. We illustrate the use of the conditions in identifying commonly used demand functions that induce RBP analytically and by means of several numerical examples.     

Bullwhip effect in a supply chain model with multiple delivery delays

We develop a model of differential equations for a supply chain with delivery time delays between every adjacent firms. Based on the supply chain model, we provide a new perspective of the bullwhip effect and show that the bullwhip effect is intrinsic in supply chains in the sense that the equilibrium state of each firm in the supply chain is a cumulative forward product of the ratios of order fulfillment and placement between adjacent firms toward the end customer demand. We also show that it is the multiple time delays instead of the constant end consumer demand that determine the stability of the equilibrium states. However, the consumer demand has impacts on the stability of the equilibrium states of the supply chain when the end retailer’s inventory decisions are linearly related to the end consumer demand.     

Measure of bullwhip effect in supply chains with autoregressive demand process

In supply chain management, one of the most critical problems which require a lot of effort to deal with is how to quantify and alleviate the impact of bullwhip effect – the phenomenon in which information on demand is distorted while moving upstream. Although it is well established that demand forecast, lead time, order batching, shortage gaming and price fluctuation are the main sources that lead to the bullwhip effect, the problem of quantifying bullwhip effect still remain unsolved in many situations due to the complex nature of the problem. In this research, a measure of bullwhip effect will be developed for a simple two-stage supply chain that includes only one retailer and one supplier in the environment where the retailer employs base stock policy for their inventory and demand forecast is performed through the first-order autoregressive model, AR(1). The effect of autoregressive coefficient and lead time on this measure will then be investigated.     

Modeling and analysis of the causes of bullwhip effect in centralized and decentralized supply chain using response surface method

The “bullwhip” effect is a major cause of supply chain deficiencies. This phenomenon refers to grow the amplification of demand or inventory variability as it moves up the supply chain. Supply chain managers experience this variance amplification in both inventory levels and orders. Other side, dampening variance in orders may have a negative impact on customer service due to the increase in the inventory variance. This paper with simulating a three stage supply chains consisting of a single retailer, single wholesaler and single manufacturer under both centralized and decentralized chains. In this paper, it is intended to analysis the causes of bullwhip effect from two dimensions of order and inventory variance using the response surface methodology. The results show that in both supply chains, rationing factor is considered as the least important cause of bullwhip effect. While the wholesaler’s order batching and the chain’s order batching are considered as the main causes for the bullwhip effect in the decentralized and centralized chains, respectively.     

The incremental bullwhip effect of operational deviations in an arborescent supply chain with requirements planning

Lee et al. (1997) advocated the idea of sharing demand and order information among different supply chain entities to mitigate the bullwhip effect. Even with full supply chain visibility afforded by IT systems with requirements planning and with no information distortion, we identify a “core” bullwhip effect inherent to any supply chain because of the underlying demand characteristics and replenishment lead times. In addition, we quantify an incremental bullwhip effect as various operational deviations (inaccurate order placements, batching, lag in sharing demand forecast) contribute incrementally to the variance of the order quantity not only at the node where the deviation is taking place but also at all upstream supply chain nodes. We discuss some managerial implications of our results in the context of a UK manufacturer.     

Random yield supply chain with a yield dependent secondary market

This paper considers a simple supply chain with one supplier and one retailer where the supplier’s production is subject to random yield and the retailer faces uncertain demand. There exists a secondary market for acquiring or disposing products by the supplier. We study both the centralized and decentralized systems. In the decentralized system, a no risk sharing contract and a risk sharing minimum commitment contract are analyzed. The supply chain with the risk sharing contract is further analyzed with a constant secondary market price and a yield dependent secondary market price. We present both the supplier’s and the retailer’s optimal strategies and provide insights for managers when making decisions under random yield risk and demand uncertainty. We find that the secondary market generally has a positive impact on supply chain performance and the actual effect of random yield risk on the supply chain performance depends on cost parameters and supply chain contract settings. Under certain conditions, reducing yield randomness may weaken the double marginalization effect and improve the chain performance. From the numerical study, we also show that there exists an optimal commitment level for the supply chain.     

供应链零售商预测技术研究—基于牛鞭效应的视角

一阶自回归(AR(1))序列模拟需求过程是传统文献采用的经典模型,然而上述文献关于需求过程参数(如需求自回归系数)对牛鞭效应的影响分析缺乏实践意义,为了更符合企业的实际决策过程,本文建立了需求依赖于价格、而以AR(1)序列模拟价格过程的需求函数模型,分析了最小均方差、移动平均和指数平滑预测下的牛鞭效应,确定了零售商的预测技术选择条件。研究表明:(1)产品市场规模不影响零售商预测技术的选择;(2)当产品价格敏感系数较小或价格自回归系数较小时,零售商应选择最小均方差预测技术;(3)当产品价格敏感系数和价格自回归系数均较大时,零售商应选择移动平均预测技术。     

历史订单信息对牛鞭效应的影响分析

客户需求信息的失真是导致牛鞭效应存在的原因,基于零售商的历史订单数据对其需求进行预测可以部分消除牛鞭效应。论文基于零售商-分销商二级供应链视角,分析了在零售商的需求为线性自回归模式的二级供应链中,分销商利用零售商历史订单数据和现有订单数据进行需求预测时自身库存成本的变更以及整个供应链的牛鞭效应的缓解程度。结果表明:分销商利用历史订单数据进行库存的决策可以显著地降低自己的平均库存和需求的波动,这种降低程度在零售商的订货提前期较大的情况下比较明显,但是零售商的需求预测相关系数对它影响不大。     

Impact of information sharing and lead time on bullwhip effect and on-hand inventory

This work analyzes a two echelon (warehouse–retailer) serial supply chain to study the impact of information sharing (IS) and lead time on bullwhip effect and on-hand inventory. The customer demand at the retailer is assumed to be an autoregressive (AR(1)) process. Both the echelons use a minimum mean squared error (MMSE) model for forecasting lead time demand (LTD), and follow an adaptive base-stock inventory policy to determine their respective order quantities. For the cases of without IS and inter as well as intra echelon IS, expressions for the bullwhip effect and on-hand inventory for the warehouse are obtained, considering deterministic lead-time. The results are compared with the previous research work and an easy analysis of the various bullwhip effect expressions under different scenarios, is done to understand the impact of IS on the bullwhip effect phenomenon. It is shown that some part of bullwhip effect will always remain even after sharing both inter as well as intra echelon information. Further, with the help of a numerical example it is shown that the lead time reduction is more beneficial in comparison to the sharing of information in terms of reduction in the bullwhip effect phenomenon.     

Managing the order pipeline to reduce supply chain volatility

The bullwhip effect in particular, and supply chain volatility in general, has been the subject of much analytical and empirical investigation by researchers. One goal of this work has been to determine supply chain designs and policies that minimize volatility. Using a system dynamics approach, we use three distinct supply chain volatility metrics to compare the ability of two alternative pipeline inventory management policies to respond to a demand shock. The results indicate that no one policy dominates on all three metrics of supply chain volatility. A simplistic static pipeline policy minimizes the bullwhip effect and lessens the likelihood of on-hand inventory oscillations, while a more sophisticated dynamic pipeline policy may converge more rapidly to the new equilibrium. In addition, simulation results suggest that the dynamic policy provides better customer service through fewer stockouts and backorders.     

Demand forecasting and sharing strategies to reduce fluctuations and the bullwhip effect in supply chains

Supply chain inventories are prone to fluctuations and instability. Known as the bullwhip effect, small variations in the end item demand create oscillations that amplify throughout the chain. By using system dynamics simulation, we investigate some of the structural sources of the bullwhip effect, and explore the effectiveness of information sharing to eliminate the undesirable fluctuations. Extensive simulation analysis is carried out on parameters of some standard ordering policies, as well as external demand and lead-time parameters. Simulation results show that (i) a major structural cause of the bullwhip effect is isolated demand forecasting performed at each echelon of the supply chain, and (ii) demand and forecast sharing strategies can significantly reduce the bullwhip effect, even though they cannot completely eliminate it. We specifically show how each policy is improved by demand and forecast sharing. Future research involves more advanced ordering and forecasting methods, modelling of other well-known sources of bullwhip, and more complex supply network structures.     

大规模风电并网的双供应源电力供应链牛鞭效应分析

中国当前的电力供应链除具有部分垄断特征外,还由于大规模风电并网使得电力供给也出现随机性,它与随机需求一起影响了供应链信息的准确传递,在电力供应链产生了牛鞭效应,但对这类问题的研究极少。本文在分析中国电力供应链特点的基础上,构建了由煤炭供应企业、发电厂(火力发电和风力发电)和用户组成的多级电力供应链模型,揭示了牛鞭效应在单/双供应源两种供应链类型下的变化。研究结果表明,大规模风电并网形成的双供应源电力供应链牛鞭效应较大且波动剧烈,尤其当下游用户需求较平稳时,供应链会出现牛鞭效应与反牛鞭效应共存现象,而预测技术的选择、风电场合理规划等有助于抑制牛鞭效应,保证电力安全并减小资源浪费。     

牛鞭效应弱化与反牛鞭效应强化在完美信息下联合作用的博弈

在供应链运作过程中,同时存在牛鞭效应与反牛鞭效,若仅考虑到供应链的成本、需求偏差等问题,这种存在会因有限理性的驱使使得牛鞭效应弱化与反牛鞭效应强化.因此,认为供应链的上下游在周期内会表现出牛鞭效应弱化与反牛鞭效应强化的联合作用,联合作用使得单个企业达到低平均库存成本,也意味着供应链的整体库存最低且整体市场需求偏差最低,间接地、自动地从整体上消除牛鞭效应或反牛鞭效应,使得整条供应链不管是短期的还是长期来看是最佳的,若是长期,还会给供应链企业带来显著的战略优势.     

模糊连续需求下供应链收益共享契约机制研究

研究一个由供应商和零售商组成的两级供应链系统在模糊连续需求环境下的运作过程。将市场需求视为三角模糊数,利用模糊截集理论分析模糊连续需求下的分散决策和集中决策过程,并给出收益共享契约机制下的决策模型。研究结果表明：在模糊连续需求环境下,零售商的订购量存在唯一最优解;供应链系统的“双重边际化”效应同样存在;收益共享契约机制可以实现供应链中成员问的协调。最后,通过数值例子对模型进行了比较分析。     

The effect of replenishment policies on the bullwhip effect: A transfer function approach

An important phenomenon in supply chain management, known as the bullwhip effect, suggests that demand variability increases as one moves up a supply chain. This paper examines the influence of different replenishment policies on the occurrence of the bullwhip effect. The paper demonstrates that certain replenishment policies can in themselves be inducers of the bullwhip effect, while others inherently lower demand variability. The main causes of increase in variability are projections of future demand expectations, which result in over-exaggerated responses to changes in demand. We suggest that through appropriate selection and use of certain replenishment rules, the bullwhip effect can be avoided, subsequently allowing supply chain management costs to be lowered.     

Multi-period price promotions in a single-supplier, multi-retailer supply chain under asymmetric demand information

This paper considers a two-stage supply chain in which a supplier serves a set of stores in a retail chain. We consider a two-stage Stackelberg game in which the supplier must set price discounts for each period of a finite planning horizon under uncertainty in retail-store demand. As a mechanism to stimulate sales, the supplier offers periodic off-invoice price discounts to the retail chain. Based on the price discounts offered by the supplier, and after store demand uncertainty is resolved, the retail chain determines individual store order quantities in each period. Because the supplier offers store-specific prices, the retailer may ship inventory between stores, a practice known as diverting. We demonstrate that, despite the resulting bullwhip effect and associated costs, a carefully designed price promotion scheme can improve the supplier’s profit when compared to the case of everyday low pricing (EDLP). We model this problem as a stochastic bilevel optimization problem with a bilinear objective at each level and with linear constraints. We provide an exact solution method based on a Reformulation-Linearization Technique (RLT). In addition, we compare our solution approach with a widely used heuristic and another exact solution method developed by Al-Khayyal (Eur. J. Oper. Res. 60(3):306–314, 1992) in order to benchmark its quality.     

区块链技术影响下的供应链系统动态响应性研究

为解决供应链系统中信息时滞和不对称问题,加快推动区块链技术在供应链管理中的创新发展,本文运用控制理论构建由分销商和零售商组成的二级供应链系统控制模型,引入区块链技术影响下的信息校正因子,推导系统的传递函数,通过MATLAB仿真不同需求信号下的订单可变性和库存波动。仿真结果表明:(1)区块链技术的应用提高了库存系统的精准性和稳定性;(2)高库存可变性伴随着高订单可变性;(3)指数平滑系数和区块链技术影响下的信息校正因子有效抑制供应链中的牛鞭效应;(4)信息延迟时间越长,区块链技术影响下的信息校正因子对控制系统的抑制作用越显著。本研究量化了区块链技术对供应链中牛鞭效应的影响,提高了供应链系统的精准性和稳定性,丰富了区块链技术在供应链管理中的应用,为企业管理者提供新的研究思路。