Glycine-based polymeric surfactants with varied polar head group: II. chemical selectivity in micellar electrokinetic chromatography using linear solvation energy relationships

A series of four acyl and four alkenoxy glycinates (i.e., mono-, di-, tri-, and tetraderivatives of polysodium N-undecenoyl glycinate (poly-SUGs) as well as polysodium N-undecenoxy carbonyl glycinates (poly-SUCGs)) were compared for simultaneous separation of nonhydrogen bonding (NHB), hydrogen-bond acceptor (HBA), and hydrogen-bond donor (HBD) solutes. An increase in the number of glycine units in the polar head group of polymeric surfactant decreases both the retention and the migration window of all solutes with some changes in separation selectivity. The poly(sodium N-undecenoxy carbonyl-glycinate) (poly-SUCG1) with one glycine unit was the least polar surfactant and has the lowest phase ratio, but this monoglycinate surfactant provided the best simultaneous separation of 10-NHBs and 8-HBAs. On the other hand, 9-HBDs were well separated using any of the six mono-, di-, and triglycinate surfactants compared to the two tetraglycinates. Linear solvation energy relationships (LSERs) and separation of the geometrical isomers studies were also performed to further envisage the selectivity differences. From LSER studies, the phase ratio and hydrogen-bond-donating strength of the poly-SUG series of surfactant were found to increase with an increase in the size of the head group, but no clear trends were observed for poly-SUCG surfactants. The cohesiveness for all poly-SUG and poly-SUCG was positive, but the values were generally lower (with exception of the poly(sodium N-undecenoyl glycyl-glycyl-glycinate)) at a higher number of glycine units. Finally, the poly(sodium N-undecenoyl glycinate) and poly-SUCG1 were found to be the two best polymeric surfactants as they provided relatively higher shape selectivity for separation of two of the three sets of geometrical isomers.     

Polymeric sulfated surfactants with varied hydrocarbon tail: I. Synthesis, characterization, and application in micellar electrokinetic chromatography

The influence of surfactant hydrocarbon tail on the solute/pseudostationary phase interactions was examined. Four anionic sulfated surfactants with 8-, 9-, 10-, and 11-carbon chains having a polymerizable double bond at the end of the hydrocarbon chain were synthesized and characterized before and after polymerization. The critical micelle concentration (CMC), polarity, and aggregation number of the four sodium alkenyl sulfate (SAIS) surfactants were determined using fluorescence spectroscopy. The partial specific volume of the polymeric SAIS (poly-SAIS) surfactants was estimated by density measurements and capillary electrophoresis (CE) was employed for determination of methylene selectivity as well as for elution window. The CMC of the monomers of SAIS surfactants decrease with increase in chain length and correlated well when fluorescence method was compared to CE. The physicochemical properties (partial specific volume, methylene selectivity, electrophoretic mobility, and elution window) increased with an increase in chain length. However, no direct relationship was found between the aggregation number and the length of hydrophobic tail of poly-SAIS surfactants. These polymeric surfactants were then used as pseudostationary phases in micellar electrokinetic chromatography (MEKC) to study the retention behavior and selectivity factor of 36 benzene derivatives with different chemical characteristics. Although variation in chain length of the polymeric surfactants significantly affects the retention of nonhydrogen bonding (NHB) benzene derivatives, these effects were less pronounced for hydrogen bond acceptor (HBA) and hydrogen bond donor (HBD) benzene derivatives. Therefore, hydrophobicity of poly-SAIS surfactants was found to be a major driving force for retention of NHB derivatives. However, for several benzene derivatives (NHB, HBA, and HBD) significantly higher selectivity factor was observed with longest chain polymeric surfactant (e.g., poly(sodium 10-undecenyl sulfate), poly-SUS) compared to shorter chain polymeric surfactant (e.g., poly(sodium 7-octenyl sulfate), poly-SOcS). In addition, the effect of the surfactant hydrophobic chain was also found to have some impact on migration order of NHB, HBA, and HBD benzene derivatives.     

Cationic surfactants for micellar electrokinetic chromatography: 1. Characterization of selectivity using the linear solvation energy relationships model

MEKC and the linear solvation energy relationship (LSER) model have been applied to two series of cationic surfactants. The synthetic flexibility of the quaternary ammonium group is exploited to generate the two series, one consisting of linear substitutions and the other incorporating the ammonium into ring structures of varying size. The effects of the head group structure on the CMC, aggregation number, and electrophoretic properties of the surfactants were determined. These surfactants were also characterized with the LSER model, which allowed the contributions of five chemical factors to the interactions between solutes and the micelles to be evaluated. Trends were observed in the cohesivity and polarity of the linear surfactant series, with both increasing with the size of the head group. No trends in the LSER parameters were observed in the cyclic series, but the LSER results do show that the surfactants with cyclic head groups provide a significantly different solvation environment from the linear series. Additional trends were observed in the aggregation behavior and chromatographic properties of the surfactants. These included changes in the CMCs, aggregation numbers, EOF, and electrophoretic mobility of the micelles that correlate to changes in head group size.     

Application of linear solvation energy relationships to polymeric pseudostationary phases in micellar electrokinetic chromatography

Polymerized sodium 11-acrylamidoundecanoate (poly(Na 11-AAU)) was used as a pseudostationary phase (PSP) for micellar electrokinetic chromatography to separate uncharged compounds. The polymer PSP showed signifcantly different solute migration behaviors from conventional micelles including sodium dodecyl sulfate and poly (sodium 10-undecylenate), giving high separation efficiencies (>200000 theoretical plates/m). Linear solvation energy relationships were used to evaluate and characterize the chemical interactions that influence the retention behavior in the poly (Na 11-AAU) micellar system. It was found that the solute volume and solute hydrogen bond basicity mainly influenced the retention. The characteristic feature of the poly (Na 11-AAU) micellar system is that the micelle has a significantly higher capacity for dipole-dipole and dipole-induced dipole interactions as well as a slightly higher capacity for electron pair interactions than the aqueous phase. Due to its unique selectivity, the poly(Na 11-AAU) micellar system would become an attractive new option for selectivity optimization on methods development.     

Monomeric and polymeric anionic gemini surfactants and mixed surfactant systems in micellar electrokinetic chromatography. Part II: characterization of chemical selectivity using two linear solvation energy relationship models

Sodium di(undecenyl) tartarate monomer (SDUT), a vesicle-forming amphiphilic compound possessing two hydrophilic carboxylate headgroups and two hydrophobic undecenyl chains, was prepared and polymerized to form a polymeric vesicle (i.e., poly-SDUT). The anionic surfactants of SDUT and poly-SDUT (carboxylate head group) and sodium dodecyl sulfate, SDS (sulfate head groups) as well as mixed surfactant systems (SDS/SDUT, SDS/poly-SDUT, and SDUT/poly-SDUT) were applied as pseudostationary phases in micellar electrokinetic chromatography (MEKC). Two linear solvation energy relationship (LSER) models, i.e., solvatochromic and solvation parameter models, were successfully applied to investigate the effect of the type and composition of pseudostationary phases on the retention mechanism and selectivity in MEKC. The solvatochromic and solvation parameter models were used to help understand the fundamental nature of the solute-pseudostationary phase interactions and to characterize the properties of the pseudostationary phases (e.g., solute size and hydrogen bond-accepting ability for all pseudostationary phases). The solute types were found to have a significant effect on the LSER system coefficients and on the predicted retention factors. Although both LSER models provide the same information, the solvation parameter model is found to provide much better results both statistically and chemically than the solvatochromic model.     

Characterization of a cationic phosphonium surfactant for micellar electrokinetic chromatography: using the linear solvation energy relationships model

A phosphonium surfactant is introduced as a pseudostationary phase for MEKC and its performance and selectivity are compared to that of an analogous ammonium surfactant. The linear solvation energy relationship model has been applied to the two cationic surfactants, allowing the contributions of five chemical factors to the interactions between solutes and the micelles to be evaluated. Differences in the pseudophases cohesivity and acid/base interactions were observed. Despite the significant differences observed in the solvation parameter results the two phases have remarkably similar electrophoretic properties, with the anodic EOF produced by the dynamic coating and the electrophoretic mobility of the two surfactants being statistically equal.     

Effects of organic modifiers on retention mechanism and selectivity in micellar electrokinetic capillary chromatography studied by linear solvation energy relationships

The effects of six organic modifiers (urea, methanol, dioxane, tetrahydrofuran, acetonitrile and 2-propanol) on the retention mechanism and separation selectivity of the bulk buffer in micellar electrokinetic capillary chromatography (MECC) with sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) micelles as pseudo-stationary phase have been investigated through linear solvation energy relationships (LSERs). It is found that the retention value in MECC systems with or without organic modifier is primarily dependent on the solvophobic interaction and the hydrogen bonding interaction with the solute as proton acceptor, while the dipolar interaction and the hydrogen bonding interaction with the solute as proton donor play minor roles. The effects of the organic modifiers on the solvophobic, dipolar and hydrogen bonding interactions are evaluated in terms of the relationship between regression coefficient of the LSER equations and the modifier concentration. The variations of the solvophobic interaction and the dipolar interaction with change of the modifier concentration can be approximately explained using the solubility parameter and the dipolarity/polarizability parameter of the organic modifier, respectively. However, the relationships between the hydrogen bond acidity and basicity of the bulk buffer and the organic modifiers are rather complicated. Those results may be caused from the displacement of organic modifiers to the water adsorbed on the micellar surface as well as changes in the acidity and basicity of the bulk buffer with the addition of organic modifiers. In addition, it is found that the phase ratio is influenced significantly by the use of organic modifier.     

Linear solvation energy relationships of anionic dimeric surfactants in micellar electrokinetic chromatography II. Effect of the length of a hydrophilic spacer

Anionic dimeric surfactants with hydrophilic spacers containing two to six oxygen atoms were synthesized and applied as pseudostationary phases in micellar electrokinetic chromatography. Their selectivity was determined via linear solvation energy relationships. There were no differences in cohesiveness, polarizability or dipolarity with increasing spacer length, but there was a clear trend in increasing hydrogen bond accepting ability, and a concomitant decrease in hydrogen bond donating ability. The different selectivity of these dimeric surfactants compared to sodium dodecylsulfate can be useful for optimizing separations of mixtures of solutes for which these types of interactions are important. Their critical micelle concentrations were in the range of 0.2-0.3mM, except for the surfactant with the shortest spacer (<0.03 mM), and are much lower than those of conventional surfactants used in micellar electrokinetic chromatography.     

Statistical evaluation of linear solvation energy relationship models used to characterize chemical selectivity in micellar electrokinetic chromatography

Characterization of retention and selectivity differences between surfactants in micellar electrokinetic chromatography (MEKC) using linear solvation energy relationships (LSERs) has been given a significant amount of attention in the last four years. This report evaluates the validity of using the two LSER models that have been used to fit retention in MEKC in the literature. The results and the fit of the revised model and parameters developed by Abraham and coworkers are compared to the original model developed by Kamlet, Taft, and coworkers. LSERs can generally only be used as a comparative tool to describe the selectivity differences between surfactant systems used in MEKC. With this in mind, it was determined that the results of both models essentially provide the same information about these differences. However, the revised model and parameters have been found to yield a statistically better fit of the MEKC retention data as well as providing more chemically sound LSER coefficients.     

Linear solvation energy relationships of anionic dimeric surfactants in micellar electrokinetic chromatography I. Effect of the length of a hydrophobic spacer

The influence of the length of a flexible hydrophobic spacer on the selectivity of anionic dimeric surfactants was investigated. Disodium 1,omega-bis(decyloxymethyl)-dioxa alkane-1,omega disulfates with a spacer containing an ethylene, butylene, hexylene, octylene, decylene or dodecylene group were synthesized, and four of these were evaluated for use in micellar electrokinetic chromatography (MEKC) via linear solvation energy relationships (LSERs). There were no significant differences in the system constants of these surfactants, indicating that their micelles all have a very similar interface with the aqueous phase, regardless of the length of the hydrophobic spacer. Compared to sodium dodecylsulfate (SDS), these dimeric surfactants are slightly more cohesive, interact better with polarizable compounds, and are somewhat better hydrogen bond acceptors and worse hydrogen bond donors, while there is no difference in dipolarity. The critical micelle concentrations (CMCs) of these surfactants were in the order of 1mM, except for the dimeric surfactant with a spacer containing an ethylene group, which had a CMC <0.03 mM.     

Polymeric and polymer-supported pseudostationary phases in micellar electrokinetic chromatography: performance and selectivity

Several types of synthetic ionic polymers have been employed as pseudostationary phases in electrokinetic chromatography. The polymers have been shown to have some significant advantages and different chemical selectivity relative to conventional surfactant micelles. Polymeric phases are effective for the separation and analysis of hydrophobic and chiral compounds, and may be useful for the application of mass spectrometric detection. Additionally, the polymeric phases often demonstrate unique selectivity relative to micellar phases, and can be designed and synthesized to provide desired selectivity. This review covers efforts to develop and characterize the performance, characteristics, and selectivity of synthetic polymeric pseudostationary phases since their introduction in 1992. Some ideas for the future development of polymeric pseudostationary phases and the role they may play in electrokinetic separations are presented.     

Novel alkyl-modified anionic siloxanes as pseudostationary phases for electrokinetic chromatography: II. Selectivity studied by linear solvation energy relationships.

Anionic, water-soluble siloxane polymers modified with different lengths of alkyl chains have very different selectivity than sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) micelles when used as pseudostationary phases in electrokinetic chromatography. The siloxanes in this study are random copolymers with side chains bearing sulfonate groups and alkyl groups (C8, C12, or C18), with the proportion of alkyl groups between 10 and 25% of the total. The differences in selectivity have been studied by linear solvation energy relationships (LSERs). The siloxanes in general have been found to be more cohesive, less polar, more able to interact with solutes through n- and pi-electrons, and more able to accept hydrogen bonds than SDS micelles, while the ability to act as hydrogen bond donors is not significantly different than SDS micelles. In addition, the performance in a pH 7.0 Tris buffer has been investigated and the siloxanes were found to have higher methylene selectivities and more variable electrophoretic mobilities than in borate buffers.     

On-line sample concentration in micellar electrokinetic chromatography using cationic surfactants

Two on-line sample concentration techniques, sample stacking and sweeping, were evaluated using cationic surfactants as pseudostationary phases in micellar electrokinetic chromatography. As cationic surfactant micelles, tetradecyltrimethylammonium bromide and cetyltrimethylammonium chloride were employed. About 10-fold and 1000-fold increases in detection sensitivity in terms of peak heights were observed by sample stacking and sweeping, respectively, without suppression of the electroosmotic flow. In particular, the concentration limits of detection (S/N=3) for test naphthalenesulfonic acids obtained with sweeping were from 0.96 to 0.47 ppb with UV detection without any preconcentration procedure.     

Glycine-based polymeric surfactants with varied polar head group: I. synthesis, characterization, and application in micellar electrokinetic chromatography

The monomers and polymers of four anionic amide type sodium undecenoxy carbonyl glycinate (SUCG) surfactants and four anionic carbamate type sodium undecenoyl glycinate (SUG) surfactants with 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-glycine unit as head group were synthesized and characterized. The CMC and aggregation number (A) for all eight surfactants were determined using fluorescence spectroscopy. In addition, the CMC values of these surfactants were also projected by surface tension and CE. The CMC of the monomers decreases with increases in the size of glycine head groups and correlates well when the fluorescence method was compared to CE. The A number increases and partial specific volume (V) decreases with increase in size of the head group of both monomers and polymers. However, A and V are always lower for the polymers than the corresponding monomers. The electrophoretic and chromatographic parameters of micelle polymers of SUG and SUCG were also examined. The coefficient of EOF increases with the increase in size of the head group but the electrophoretic mobility decreases which results in a decrease in the elution range. The retention data suggest that the selectivity differences among the mono-, di-, and tripeptide derivatives of poly-SUCG surfactants are relatively higher compared to the derivatives of poly-SUG series.     

Adjusting selectivity in micellar electrokinetic capillary chromatography with 1,2-hexanediol

In this report, we introduce a new micelle modifier useful to alter selectivity in micellar electrokinetic capillary chromatography (MECC). 1,2-Hexanediol acts as a class I organic modifier in that its effects are on the sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) micellar rather than the surrounding aqueous phase. This characteristic allows 1,2-hexanediol to improve resolution when applied at concentrations as low as 20 mM (0.25% v/v) by altering the selectivity observed with SDS alone. The effects of 1,2-hexanediol on the critical micelle concentration of SDS, electroosmotic flow, electrophoretic mobility of the SDS micelle, and reproducibility are presented. 1,2-Hexanediol had little impact on the migration time window at concentrations below 100 mM. Changes in selectivity induced by 1,2-hexanediol for a large set of model compounds are presented. Analytes capable of forming hydrogen bonds tend to decrease their interactions with the micellar phase while nonhydrogen bonding analytes increase their interactions. The usefulness of 1,2-hexanediol was demonstrated by examining its effects on the separation of dansylated amino acids. Eighteen of twenty amino acids could be separated with a resolution greater than 1.6 within 1600 s using a combination of 1,2-hexanediol and isopropanol.     

Copolymerized polymeric surfactants: characterization and application in micellar electrokinetic chromatography

An achiral monomeric surfactant (sodium 10-undecenyl sulfate, SUS) and a chiral surfactant (sodium 10-undecenoyl L-leucinate, SUL) were synthesized and polymerized individually to form poly-SUS and poly-SUL. These surfactants were then copolymerized at various molar ratios to produce a variety of copolymerized surfactants (CoPSs), possessing both achiral (sulfate) and chiral (leucinate) head groups. The CoPSs, poly-SUS, poly-SUL, and sodium dodecyl sulfate were characterized using several analytical techniques. The aggregation numbers of the polymeric surfactants and the partial specific volumes were determined by the use of fluorescence quenching and density measurements, respectively. These polymeric surfactants were investigated as novel pseudostationary phases in micellar electrokinetic chromatography (MEKC) for the separation of chiral and achiral solutes. Solute hydrophobicity was found to have major influence on the MEKC retention of alkyl phenyl ketones. In contrast, hydrogen-bonding ability of benzodiazepines is the major factor that governs their retention, but hydrophobicity has an insignificant effect on MEKC retention of benzodiazepines.     

The chemical interpretation and practice of linear solvation energy relationships in chromatography

This review focuses on the use of linear solvation energy relationships (LSERs) to understand the types and relative strength of the chemical interactions that control retention and selectivity in the various modes of chromatography ranging from gas chromatography to reversed phase and micellar electrokinetic capillary chromatography. The most recent, widely accepted symbolic representation of the LSER model, as proposed by Abraham, is given by the equation: SP=c + eE + sS + aA + bB + vV, in which, SP can be any free energy related property. In chromatography, SP is most often taken as logk' where k' is the retention factor. The letters E, S, A, B, and V denote solute dependent input parameters that come from scales related to a solute's polarizability, dipolarity (with some contribution from polarizability), hydrogen bond donating ability, hydrogen bond accepting ability, and molecular size, respectively. The e-, s-, a-, b-, and v-coefficients and the constant, c, are determined via multiparameter linear least squares regression analysis of a data set comprised of solutes with known E, S, A, B, and V values and which span a reasonably wide range in interaction abilities. Thus, LSERs are designed to probe the type and relative importance of the interactions that govern solute retention. In this review, we include a synopsis of the various solvent and solute scales in common use in chromatography. More importantly, we emphasize the development and physico-chemical basis of - and thus meaning of - the solute parameters. After establishing the meaning of the parameters, we discuss their use in LSERs as applied to understanding the intermolecular interactions governing various gas-liquid and liquid-liquid phase equilibria. The gas-liquid partition process is modeled as the sum of an endoergic cavity formation/solvent reorganization process and exoergic solute-solvent attractive forces, whereas the partitioning of a solute between two solvents is thermodynamically equivalent to the difference in two gas/liquid solution processes. We end with a set of recommendations and advisories for conducting LSER studies, stressing the proper chemical and statistical application of the methodology. We intend that these recommendations serve as a guide for future studies involving the execution, statistical evaluation, and chemical interpretation of LSERs.