Covalent, ionic, or something new? A new interpretation of the topology of the electron density at the bond critical point is proposed to characterize covalent, ionic, and charge‐shift bonding from the density point of view (see figure). The topological properties of the density representation confirm the reality of charge‐shift bonds, in which the covalent contribution is weak or repulsive, and most of the bonding is due to the covalent–ionic resonance energy.
The valence shell electron pair repulsion (VSEPR) model—also known as the Gillespie–Nyholm rules—has for many years provided a useful basis for understanding and rationalizing molecular geometry, and because of its simplicity it has gained widespread acceptance as a pedagogical tool. In its original formulation the model was based on the concept that the valence shell electron pairs behave as if they repel each other and thus keep as far apart as possible. But in recent years more emphasis has been placed on the space occupied by a valence shell electron pair, called the domain of the electron pair, and on the relative sizes and shapes of these domains. This reformulated version of the model is simpler to apply, and it shows more clearly that the Pauli principle provides the physical basis of the model. Moreover, Bader and his co-workers' analysis of the electron density distribution of many covalent molecules have shown that the local concentrations of electron density (charge concentrations) in the valence shells of the atoms in a molecule have the same relative locations and sizes as have been assumed for the electron pair domains in the VSEPR model, thus providing further support for the model. This increased understanding of the model has inspired efforts to examine the electron density distribution in molecules that have long been regarded as exceptions to the VSEPR model to try to understand these exceptions better. This work has shown that it is often important to consider not only the relative locations and sizes, but also the shapes, of both bonding and lone pair domains in accounting for the details of molecular geometry. It has also been shown that a basic assumption of the VSEPR model, namely that the core of an atom underlying its valence shell is spherical and has no influence on the geometry of a molecule, is normally valid for the nonmetals but often not valid for the metals, including the transition metals. The cores of polarizable metal atoms may be nonspherical because they include nonbonding electrons or because they are distorted by the ligands, and these nonspherical cores may have an important influence on the geometry of a molecule. 相似文献
As very light fermions, electrons are governed by antisymmetric wave functions that lead to exchange integrals in the evaluation of the energy. Here we use the localized representation of orbitals to decompose the electronic energy in a fashion that isolates the enigmatic exchange contributions and characterizes their distinctive control over electron distributions. The key to this completely general analysis is considering the electrons in groups of three, drawing attention to the curvatures of pair potentials, rather than just their amplitudes and slopes. We show that a positive curvature at short distances is essential for the mutual distancing of electrons and a negative curvature at longer distances is essential to account for the influence of lone pairs on bond torsion. Neither curvature is available in the absence of the exchange contributions. Thus, although exchange energies are much shorter range than Coulomb energies, their influence on molecular geometry is profound and readily understood. 相似文献
ChemInform is a weekly Abstracting Service, delivering concise information at a glance that was extracted from about 200 leading journals. To access a ChemInform Abstract of an article which was published elsewhere, please select a “Full Text” option. The original article is trackable via the “References” option. 相似文献
