Efficient Access to Enantiopure γ4‐Amino Acids with Proteinogenic Side‐Chains and Structural Investigation of γ4‐Asn and γ4‐Ser in Hybrid Peptide Helices

Hybrid peptides composed of α‐ and β‐amino acids have recently emerged as new class of peptide foldamers. Comparatively, γ‐ and hybrid γ‐peptides composed of γ⁴‐amino acids are less studied than their β‐counterparts. However, recent investigations reveal that γ⁴‐amino acids have a higher propensity to fold into ordered helical structures. As amino acid side‐chain functional groups play a crucial role in the biological context, the objective of this study was to investigate efficient synthesis of γ⁴‐residues with functional proteinogenic side‐chains and their structural analysis in hybrid‐peptide sequences. Here, the efficient and enantiopure synthesis of various N‐ and C‐terminal free‐γ⁴‐residues, starting from the benzyl esters (COOBzl) of N‐Cbz‐protected (E)‐α,β‐unsaturated γ‐amino acids through multiple hydrogenolysis and double‐bond reduction in a single‐pot catalytic hydrogenation is reported. The crystal conformations of eight unprotected γ⁴‐amino acids (γ⁴‐Val, γ⁴‐Leu, γ⁴‐Ile, γ⁴‐Thr(OtBu), γ⁴‐Tyr, γ⁴‐Asp(OtBu), γ⁴‐Glu(OtBu), and γ‐Aib) reveals that these amino acids adopted a helix favoring gauche conformations along the central C^γ? C^β bond. To study the behavior of γ⁴‐residues with functional side chains in peptide sequences, two short hybrid γ‐peptides P1 (Ac‐Aib‐γ⁴‐Asn‐Aib‐γ⁴‐Leu‐Aib‐γ⁴‐Leu‐CONH₂) and P2 (Ac‐Aib‐γ⁴‐Ser‐Aib‐γ⁴‐Val‐Aib‐γ⁴‐Val‐CONH₂) were designed, synthesized on solid phase, and their 12‐helical conformation in single crystals were studied. Remarkably, the γ⁴‐Asn residue in P1 facilitates the tetrameric helical aggregations through interhelical H bonding between the side‐chain amide groups. Furthermore, the hydroxyl side‐chain of γ⁴‐Ser in P2 is involved in the interhelical H bonding with the backbone amide group. In addition, the analysis of 87 γ⁴‐residues in peptide single‐crystals reveal that the γ⁴‐residues in 12‐helices are more ordered as compared with the 10/12‐ and 12/14‐helices.     

β‐Hairpins Generated from Hybrid Peptide Sequences Containing both α‐ and β‐Amino Acids

The incorporation of the β‐amino acid residues into specific positions in the strands and β‐turn segments of peptide hairpins is being systematically explored. The presence of an additional torsion variable about the C(α) C(β) bond (θ) enhances the conformational repertoire in β‐residues. The conformational analysis of three designed peptide hairpins composed of α/β‐hybrid segments is described: Boc‐Leu‐Val‐Val‐^DPro‐β Phe ‐Leu‐Val‐Val‐OMe ( 1 ), Boc‐Leu‐Val‐β Val ‐^DPro‐Gly‐β Leu ‐Val‐Val‐OMe ( 2 ), and Boc‐Leu‐Val‐β Phe ‐Val‐^DPro‐Gly‐Leu‐β Phe ‐Val‐Val‐OMe ( 3 ). 500‐MHz ¹H‐NMR Analysis supports a preponderance of β‐hairpin conformation in solution for all three peptides, with critical cross‐strand NOEs providing evidence for the proposed structures. The crystal structure of peptide 2 reveals a β‐hairpin conformation with two β‐residues occupying facing, non‐H‐bonded positions in antiparallel β‐strands. Notably, βVal(3) adopts a gauche conformation about the C(α) C(β) bond (θ=+65°) without disturbing cross‐strand H‐bonding. The crystal structure of 2 , together with previously published crystal structures of peptides 3 and Boc‐β Phe ‐β Phe ‐^DPro‐Gly‐β Phe ‐β Phe ‐OMe, provide an opportunity to visualize the packing of peptide sheets with local ‘polar segments' formed as a consequence of reversal peptide‐bond orientation. The available structural evidence for hairpins suggests that β‐residues can be accommodated into nucleating turn segments and into both the H‐bonding and non‐H‐bonding positions on the strands.     

Exploiting Aromatic Interactions for β‐Peptide Foldamer Helix Stabilization: A Significant Design Element

Tetrameric H10/12 helix stabilization was achieved by the application of aromatic side‐chains in β‐peptide oligomers by intramolecular backbone–side chain CH–π interactions. Because of the enlarged hydrophobic surface of the oligomers, a further aim was the investigation of the self‐assembly in a polar medium for the β‐peptide H10/12 helices. NMR, ECD, and molecular modeling results indicated that the oligomers formed by cis‐[1S,2S]‐ or cis‐[1R,2R]‐1‐amino‐1,2,3,4‐tetrahydronaphthalene‐2‐carboxylic acid (ATENAC) and cis‐[1R,2S]‐ or cis‐[1S,2R]‐2‐aminocyclohex‐3‐enecarboxylic acid (ACHEC) residues promote stable H10/12 helix formation with an alternating backbone configuration even at the tetrameric chain length. These results support the view that aromatic side‐chains can be applied for helical structure stabilization. Importantly, this is the first observation of a stable H10/12 helix with tetrameric chain‐length. The hydrophobically driven self‐assembly was achieved for the helix‐forming oligomers, seen as vesicles in transmission electron microscopy images. The self‐association phenomenon, which supports the helical secondary structure of these oligomers, depends on the hydrophobic surface area, because a higher number of aromatic side‐chains yielded larger vesicles. These results serve as an essential element for the design of helices relating to the H10/12 helix. Moreover, they open up a novel area for bioactive foldamer construction, while the hydrophobic area gained through the aromatic side‐chains may yield important receptor–ligand interaction surfaces, which can provide amplified binding strength.     

β‐Turn Analogues in Model αβ‐Hybrid Peptides: Structural Characterization of Peptides Containing β2,2Ac6c and β3,3Ac6c Residues

The effect of gem‐dialkyl substituents on the backbone conformations of β‐amino acid residues in peptides has been investigated by using four model peptides: Boc‐Xxx‐β^2,2Ac₆c(1‐aminomethylcyclohexanecarboxylic acid)‐NHMe (Xxx=Leu ( 1 ), Phe ( 2 ); Boc=tert‐butyloxycarbonyl) and Boc‐Xxx‐β^3,3Ac₆c(1‐aminocyclohexaneacetic acid)‐NHMe (Xxx=Leu ( 3 ), Phe ( 4 )). Tetrasubstituted carbon atoms restrict the ranges of stereochemically allowed conformations about flanking single bonds. The crystal structure of Boc‐Leu‐β^2,2Ac₆c‐NHMe ( 1 ) established a C₁₁ hydrogen‐bonded turn in the αβ‐hybrid sequence. The observed torsion angles (α(?≈?60°, ψ≈?30°), β(?≈?90°, θ≈60°, ψ≈?90°)) corresponded to a C₁₁ helical turn, which was a backbone‐expanded analogue of the type III β turn in αα sequences. The crystal structure of the peptide Boc‐Phe‐β^3,3Ac₆c‐NHMe ( 4 ) established a C₁₁ hydrogen‐bonded turn with distinctly different backbone torsion angles (α(?≈?60°, ψ≈120°), β(?≈60°, θ≈60°, ψ≈?60°)), which corresponded to a backbone‐expanded analogue of the type II β turn observed in αα sequences. In peptide 4 , the two molecules in the asymmetric unit adopted backbone torsion angles of opposite signs. In one of the molecules, the Phe residue adopted an unfavorable backbone conformation, with the energetic penalty being offset by a favorable aromatic interaction between proximal molecules in the crystal. NMR spectroscopy studies provided evidence for the maintenance of folded structures in solution in these αβ‐hybrid sequences.     

Controlling the Helix Handedness of ααβ‐Peptide Foldamers through Sequence Shifting

Peptide foldamers containing both cis ‐β‐aminocyclopentanecarboxylic acid and α‐amino acid residues combined in various sequence patterns (ααβ, αααβ, αβααβ, and ααβαααβ) were screened using CD and NMR spectroscopy for the tendency to form helices. ααβ‐Peptides were found to fold into an unprecedented and well‐defined 16/17/15/18/14/17‐helix. By extending the length of the sequence or shifting a fragment of the sequence from one terminus to another in ααβ‐peptides, the balance between left‐handed and right‐handed helix populations present in the solution can be controlled. Engineering of the peptide sequence could lead to compounds with either a strong propensity for the selected helix sense or a mixture of helical conformations of opposite senses.     

NMR‐Solution Structures in Methanol of an α‐Heptapeptide,of a β3/β2‐Nonapeptide,and of an all‐β3‐Icosapeptide Carrying the 20 Proteinogenic Side Chains

The NMR‐solution structure of an α‐heptapeptide with a central Aib residue was investigated in order to verify that, in contrast to β‐peptides, short α‐peptides do not form a helical structures in MeOH. Although the central Aib residue was found to induce a bend in the experimentally determined structure, no secondary structure typical for longer α‐peptides or proteins was found. A β²/β³‐nonapeptide with polar, positively charged side chains was subjected to NMR analysis in MeOH and H₂O. Whereas, in MeOH, it folds into a 10/12‐helix very similar to the structure determined for a corresponding β²/β³‐nonapeptide with only aliphatic side chains, no dominant conformation could be determined in H₂O. Finally, the NMR analysis of a β³‐icosapeptide containing the side chains of all 20 proteinogenic amino acids in MeOH is described. It revealed that this 20mer folds into a 3₁₄‐helix over its whole length forming six full turns, the longest 3₁₄‐helix found so far. Together, our findings confirm that, in contrast to α‐peptides, β‐peptides not only form helices with just six residues, but also form helices that are longer than helical sections usually observed in proteins or natural peptides. The higher helix‐forming propensity of long β‐peptides is attributed to the conformation‐stabilizing effect of the staggered ethane sections in β‐peptides which outweighs the detrimental effect of the increasing macrodipole.     

Engineering a β‐Helical d,l‐Peptide for Folding in Polar Media

β Helices—helices formed by alternating d,l ‐peptides and stabilized by β‐sheet hydrogen bonding—are found naturally in only a handful of highly hydrophobic peptides. This paper explores the scope of β‐helical structure by presenting the first design and biophysical characterization of a hydrophilic d,l ‐peptide, 1 , that forms a β helix in methanol. The design of 1 is based on the β‐hairpin/β helix—a new supersecondary that had been characterized previously only for hydrophobic peptides in nonpolar solvents. Incorporating polar residues in 1 provided solubility in methanol, in which the peptide adopts the expected β‐hairpin/β‐helical structure, as evidenced by CD, analytical ultracentrifugation (AUC), NMR spectroscopy, and NMR‐based structure calculations. Upon titration with water (at constant peptide concentration), the structure in methanol ( 1 m ) transitions cooperatively to an extended conformation ( 1 w ) resembling a cyclic β‐hairpin; observation of an isodichroic point in the solvent‐dependent CD spectra indicates that this transition is a two‐state process. In contrast, neither 1 m nor 1 w show cooperative thermal melting; instead, their structures appear intact at temperatures as high as 65 °C; this observation suggests that steric constraint is dominant in stabilizing these structures. Finally, the ¹H NMR CαH spectroscopic resonances of 1 m are downfield‐shifted with respect to random‐coil values, a hitherto unreported property for β helices that appears to be a general feature of these structures. These results show for the first time that an appropriately designed β‐helical peptide can fold stably in a polar solvent; furthermore, the structural and spectroscopic data reported should prove useful in the future design and characterization of water‐soluble β helices.     

A Designed Three‐Stranded β‐Sheet in an α/β Hybrid Peptide

The incorporation of β‐amino acid residues into the antiparallel β‐strand segments of a multi‐stranded β‐sheet peptide is demonstrated for a 19‐residue peptide, Boc‐LV^βFV^DPGL^βFVVL^DPGLVL^βFVV‐OMe (BBH19). Two centrally positioned ^DPro–Gly segments facilitate formation of a stable three‐stranded β‐sheet, in which β‐phenylalanine (^βPhe) residues occur at facing positions 3, 8 and 17. Structure determination in methanol solution is accomplished by using NMR‐derived restraints obtained from NOEs, temperature dependence of amide NH chemical shifts, rates of H/D exchange of amide protons and vicinal coupling constants. The data are consistent with a conformationally well‐defined three‐stranded β‐sheet structure in solution. Cross‐strand interactions between ^βPhe3/^βPhe17 and ^βPhe3/Val15 residues define orientations of these side‐chains. The observation of close contact distances between the side‐chains on the N‐ and C‐terminal strands of the three‐stranded β‐sheet provides strong support for the designed structure. Evidence is presented for multiple side‐chain conformations from an analysis of NOE data. An unusual observation of the disappearance of the Gly NH resonances upon prolonged storage in methanol is rationalised on the basis of a slow aggregation step, resulting in stacking of three‐stranded β‐sheet structures, which in turn influences the conformational interconversion between type I′ and type II′ β‐turns at the two ^DPro–Gly segments. Experimental evidence for these processes is presented. The decapeptide fragment Boc‐LV^βFV^DPGL^βFVV‐OMe (BBH10), which has been previously characterized as a type I′ β‐turn nucleated hairpin, is shown to favour a type II′ β‐turn conformation in solution, supporting the occurrence of conformational interconversion at the turn segments in these hairpin and sheet structures.     

Ambidextrous α,γ‐Hybrid Peptide Foldamers

Molecular chirality is ubiquitous in nature. The natural biopolymers, proteins and DNA, preferred a right‐handed helical bias due to the inherent stereochemistry of the monomer building blocks. Here, we are reporting a rare co‐existence of left‐ and right‐handed helical conformations and helix‐terminating property at the C‐terminus within a single molecule of α,γ‐hybrid peptide foldamers composed of achiral Aib (α‐aminoisobutyric acid) and 3,3‐dimethyl‐substituted γ‐amino acid (Adb; 4‐amino‐3,3‐dimethylbutanoic acid). At the molecular level, the left‐ and right‐handed helical screw sense of α,γ‐hybrid peptides are representing a macroscopic tendril perversion. The pronounced helix‐terminating behaviour of C‐terminal Adb residues was further explored to design helix–Schellman loop mimetics and to study their conformations in solution and single crystals. The stereochemical constraints of dialkyl substitutions on γ‐amino acids showed a marked impact on the folding behaviour of α,γ‐hybrid peptides.     

Mixed β2/β3‐Hexapeptides and β2/β3‐Nonapeptides Folding to (P)‐Helices with Alternating Twelve‐ and Ten‐Membered Hydrogen‐Bonded Rings

The structural properties of four mixed β‐peptides with alternating β²/β³‐ or β³/β²‐sequences have been analyzed by two‐dimensional homonuclear ¹H‐NMR‐ and CD spectroscopic measurements. All four β‐peptides fold into (P)‐helices with twelve‐ and ten‐membered H‐bonded rings (Figs. 3–6). CD Spectra (Fig. 2) of the mixed β³/β²‐hexapeptide 4a and β³/β²‐nonapeptide 5a , indicating that peptides of this type also adopt the 12/10‐helical conformation, were confirmed by NMR structural analysis. For the deprotected β³/β²‐nonapeptide 5d , NOEs not consistent with the 10/12 helix have been observed, showing that the stability of the helix decreases upon N‐terminal deprotection. From the NMR structures obtained, an idealized helical‐wheel representation was generated (Fig. 7), which will be used for the design of further 12/10 or 10/12 helices.     

Fine Tuning of β‐Peptide Foldamers: a Single Atom Replacement Holds Back the Switch from an 8‐Helix to a 12‐Helix

Cyclic homologated amino acids are important building blocks for the construction of helical foldamers. N‐aminoazetidine‐2‐carboxylic acid (AAzC), an aza analogue of trans‐2‐aminocyclobutanecarboxylic acid (tACBC), displays a strong hydrazino turn conformational feature, which is proposed to act as an 8‐helix primer. tACBC oligomers bearing a single N‐terminal AAzC residue were studied to evaluate the ability of AAzC to induce and support an 8‐helix along the oligopeptide length. While tACBC homooligomers assume a dominant 12‐helix conformation, the aza‐primed oligomers preferentially adopt a stabilized 8‐helix conformation for an oligomer length up to 6 residues. The (formal) single‐atom exchange at the N terminus of a tACBC oligomer thus contributes to the sustainability of the 8‐helix, which resists the switch to a 12‐helix. This effect illustrates atomic‐level programmable design for fine tuning of peptide foldamer architectures.     

Conformational structure of peptides containing dehydroalanine: Formation of β‐bend ribbon structure

α,β‐Unsaturated amino acids (dehydroamino acids) have been found in naturally occurring antibiotics of microbial origin and in some proteins. Due to the presence of the C_αC_β double bond, the dehydroamino acids influence the main‐chain and the side‐chain conformations. The lowest‐energy conformational state of the model tripeptides, Ac–X–ΔAla–NHMe, (X=Ala, Val, Leu, Abu, or Phe) corresponds to ϕ₁=−30°, ψ₁=120° and ϕ₂=ψ₂=30°. This structure is stabilized by the hydrogen bond between CO of the acetyl group and the NH of the amide group, resulting in the formation of a 10‐membered ring. In the model heptapeptide containing ΔAla at alternate position with Ala, Abu, and Leu, the lowest‐energy conformation corresponds to ϕ=−30° and ψ=120° for all the Ala, Abu, and Leu residues and ϕ=ψ=30° for all ΔAla residues. A graphical view of the molecule in this conformation reveals the formation of three hydrogen bonds involving the CO moiety of the ith residue and the NH moiety of the i+3th residue, resulting in a 10‐membered ring formation. In this structure, only alternate peptide bonds are involved in the intramolecular hydrogen‐bond formation unlike the helices and it has been named the β‐bend ribbon structure. The helical structures were predicted to be the most stable structures in the heptapeptide Ac–(Aib–ΔAla)₃–NHMe with ϕ=±30°, ψ=±60° for Aib residues and ϕ=ψ=±30° for ΔAla residues. The computational results reveal that the ΔAla residue does not induce an inverse γ‐turn in the preceding residue. It is the competitive interaction of small solvent molecules with the hydrogen‐bonding sites of the peptide which gives rise to the formation of an inverse γ‐turn (ϕ₁=−54°, ψ₁=82°; ϕ₂=44°, ψ₂=3°) in the preceding residue to ΔAla. The computational studies for the positional preference of ΔAla in the peptide containing one ΔAla and nine Ala residues reveals the formation of a 3₁₀ helical structure in all the cases with the terminal preferences for ΔAla, consistent with the position of ΔAla in the natural antibiotics. The extended structures is found to be the most stable for poly‐ΔAla. ©1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Int J Quant Chem 72: 15–23, 1999     

Hierarchical Organization of Ferrocene–Peptides

Hierarchical self‐assembly of disubstituted ferrocene (Fc)–peptide conjugates that possess Gly‐Val‐Phe and Gly‐Val‐Phe‐Phe peptide substituents leads to the formation of nano‐ and micro‐sized assemblies. Hydrogen‐bonding and hydrophobic interactions provide directionality to the assembly patterns. The self‐assembling behavior of these compounds was studied in solution by using ¹H NMR and circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopies. In the solid state, attenuated total reflectance (ATR) FTIR spectroscopy, single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction (XRD), powder X‐ray diffraction (PXRD), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) methods were used. Spontaneous self‐assembly of Fc–peptides through intra‐ and intermolecular hydrogen‐bonding interactions induces supramolecular assemblies, which further associate and give rise to fibers, large fibrous crystals, and twisted ropes. In the case of Fc[CO‐Gly‐Val‐Phe‐OMe]₂ ( 1 ), molecules initially interact to form pleated sheets that undergo association into long fibers that form bundles and rectangular crystalline cuboids. Molecular offsets and defects, such as screw dislocations and solvent effects that occur during crystal growth, induce the formation of helical arrangements, ultimately leading to large twisted ropes. By contrast, the Fc–tetrapeptide conjugate Fc[CO‐Gly‐Val‐Phe‐Phe‐OMe]₂ ( 2 ) forms a network of nanofibers at the supramolecular level, presumably due to the additional hydrogen‐bonding and hydrophobic interactions that stem from the additional Phe residues.     

Synthesis of β3‐Peptides and Mixed α/β3‐Peptides by Thioligation

Five β‐peptide thioesters ( 1 – 5 , containing 3, 4, 10 residues) were prepared by manual solid‐phase synthesis and purified by reverse‐phase preparative HPLC. A β‐undecapeptide ( 6 ) and an α‐undecapeptide ( 7 ) with N‐terminal β³‐HCys and Cys residues were prepared by manual and machine synthesis, respectively. Coupling of the thioesters with the cysteine derivatives in the presence of PhSH (Scheme and Fig. 1) in aqueous solution occurred smoothly and quantitatively. Pentadeca‐ and heneicosapeptides ( 8 – 10 ) were isolated, after preparative RP‐HPLC purification, in yields of up to 60%. Thus, the so‐called native chemical ligation works well with β‐peptides, producing larger β³‐ and α/β³‐mixed peptides. Compounds 1 – 10 were characterized by high‐resolution mass spectrometry (HR‐MS) and by CD spectroscopy, including temperature and concentration dependence. β‐Peptide 9 with 21 residues shows an intense negative Cotton effect near 210 nm but no zero‐crossing above 190 nm, (Figs. 2–4), which is characteristic of β‐peptidic 3₁₄‐helical structures. Comparison of the CD spectra of the mixed α/β‐pentadecapeptide ( 10 ) and a helical α‐peptide (Fig. 5) indicate the presence of an α‐peptidic 3.6₁₃ helix.     

Evidence that the β‐Peptide 14‐Helix is Stabilized by β3‐Residues with Side‐Chain Branching Adjacent to the β‐Carbon Atom

Oligomers of β‐substituted β‐amino acids (‘β³‐peptides') are known to adopt a helical secondary structure defined by 14‐membered ring hydrogen bonds ('14‐helix'). Here, we describe a deca‐β³‐peptide, 1 , that does not adopt the 14‐helical conformation and that may prefer an alternative secondary structure. β³‐Peptide 1 is composed exclusively of residues with side chains that are not branched adjacent to the β‐C‐atom (β³‐hLeu, β³‐hLys, and β³‐hTyr). In contrast, an analogous β‐peptide, 2 , containing β³‐hVal residues in place of the β³‐hLeu residues of 1 , adopts a 14‐helical conformation in MeOH, according to CD data. These results illustrate the importance of side‐chain branching in determining the conformational preferences of β³‐peptides.     

β‐Sheet to Helical‐Sheet Evolution Induced by Topochemical Polymerization: Cross‐α‐Amyloid‐like Packing in a Pseudoprotein with Gly‐Phe‐Gly Repeats

Protein‐mimics are of great interest for their structure, stability, and properties. We are interested in the synthesis of protein‐mimics containing triazole linkages as peptide‐bond surrogate by topochemical azide‐alkyne cycloaddition (TAAC) polymerization of azide‐ and alkyne‐modified peptides. The rationally designed dipeptide N₃‐CH₂CO‐Phe‐NHCH₂CCH ( 1 ) crystallized in a parallel β‐sheet arrangement and are head‐to‐tail aligned in a direction perpendicular to the β‐sheet‐direction. Upon heating, crystals of 1 underwent single‐crystal‐to‐single‐crystal polymerization forming a triazole‐linked pseudoprotein with Gly‐Phe‐Gly repeats. During TAAC polymerization, the pseudoprotein evolved as helical chains. These helical chains are laterally assembled by backbone hydrogen bonding in a direction perpendicular to the helical axis to form helical sheets. This interesting helical‐sheet orientation in the crystal resembles the cross‐α‐amyloids, where α‐helices are arranged laterally as sheets.     

Artificial β‐Double Helices from Achiral γ‐Peptides

Double helices are not common in polypeptides and proteins except in the peptide antibiotic gramicidin A and analogous l,d ‐peptides. In contrast to natural polypeptides, remarkable β‐double‐helical structures from achiral γ‐peptides built from α,β‐unsaturated γ‐amino acids have been observed. The crystal structures suggest that they adopted parallel β‐double helical structures and these structures are stabilized by the interstrand backbone amide H‐bonds. Furthermore, both NMR spectroscopy and fluorescence studies support the existence of double‐helical conformations in solution. Although a variety of folded architectures featuring distinct H‐bonds have been discovered from the β‐ and γ‐peptide foldamers, this is the first report to show that achiral γ‐peptides can spontaneously intertwine into β‐double helical structures.     

[Leu2]Gramicidin S preserves the structural properties of its parent peptide and forms helically aligned β‐sheets

For crystallographic analysis, Leu was substituted for Orn in Gramicidin S (LGS) to suppress interactions with hydrophilic solvent molecules, which increased the flexibility of the Orn side chains, leading to disorder within the crystals. The asymmetric unit (C₆₂H₉₄N₁₀O₁₀·1.296C₃H₈O·1.403H₂O) contains three LGS molecules (A, B and C) forming β‐turn and intramolecular β‐sheet structures. With the exception of one motif in molecule C, d ‐Phe‐Pro turn motifs (Phe is phenylalanine and Pro is proline) were classed as type II′ β‐turns. The peptide backbones twist slightly to the right along the long axis of the molecule. The puckering of Pro is in a Cγ‐endo or twisted Cγ‐endo–Cβ‐exo form. Flanking molecules are arranged such that the angles (A…B = 104°, B…C = 139° and C…A = 117°) form helical β‐sheets. Solvent molecules interact with the peptide backbones supporting the β‐sheets. The forms of the replacement Leu side chains are consistent with the e‐form of the Orn side chain in GS analogues. No hydrophilic region composed of solvent molecules, such as that observed in Gramicidin S hydrochloride (GS·HCl) crystals, was found. The perturbation of αH chemical shifts and coupling constants of CONH showed that the structural properties of GS·HCl and LGS are similar to each other in solution. CD spectra also supported the structural similarity. With the sequence cyclo(–Val–Leu–Leu–d ‐Phe–Pro–)₂ (Val is valine and Leu is leucine), LGS lacks the amphiphilicity and antimicrobial activity of parental Gramicidin S (GS). However, the structure of LGS reflects the structural characteristics of GS and no disordering inconvenient for structural analysis was found. Thus, LGS could be a novel scaffold useful for studying β‐turn and sheet structures.     

Halbsandwich‐Komplexe von Ruthenium(II), Rhodium(III) und Iridium(III) mit Tripeptidestern aus α‐, β‐ und γ‐Aminosäuren als Liganden. — Peptidsynthese und Cyclisierung zu Cyclotripeptiden am Metallzentrum

Metal Complexes with Biological Important Ligands. CXLII. Half Sandwich Complexes of Ruthenium(II), Rhodium(III), and Iridium(III) with Tripeptide Esters from α‐, β‐, and γ‐Amino Acids as Ligands. — Peptide Synthesis and Cyclization to Cyclotripeptides at Metal Centers Halfsandwich complexes of ruthenium, rhodium and iridium with deprotonated N, N', N"‐tripeptide ester ligands were obtained from chloro bridged compounds and tripeptide methyl esters ( 1—6 ) or by peptide synthesis at a metal centre ( 9—15 ). For the peptide synthesis at the complex (C₆Me₆)Ru coordinated dipeptide methyl esters from glycine and β‐alanine or γ‐amino butyric acid were elongated by an a‐amino acid methylester. The tripeptide ester Ru(η⁶‐C₆Me₆) complexes with chiral amino acid components and an “asymmetric” metal atom are formed with high diastereoselectivity. The tripeptide esters Gly‐Gly‐β‐AlaOMe, Val‐Gly‐β‐AlaOMe and Phe‐Gly‐β‐AlaOMe can be condensated at the (C₆Me₆)Ru complex with sodium methanolate to give triple deprotonated cyclic tripeptides.